Detection of allelic frequency differences between the sexes in humans: A signature of sexually antagonistic selection

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1489-1500

  Lucotte, Elise A ^a,b   Laurent, Romain ^a   Heyer, Evelyne ^a   Ségurel, Laure ^a   Toupance, Bruno ^a  

^a Université Paris Diderot   (France)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Genome scan; Intralocus sexual conflict; Sexual dimorphism; Sexually antagonistic selection; X chromosome

Indexed keywords

FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MALE; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; X CHROMOSOME;

CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, X; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MALE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 85014849925     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evw090     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. 1000 Genome Project Consortium. 2010. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 467:1061-1073.
2. Altschup SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 215:403-410.
3. Altshuler DM, et al. 2010. Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature 467:52-58.
4. Badyaev AV. 2002. Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends Ecol Evol. 17:369-378.
5. Balaresque P, Toupance B, Quintana-Murci L, Crouau-Roy B, Heyer E. 2004. Sex-specific selection on the human X chromosome? Genet Res. 83:169-176.
6. Benagiano G, Farris M, Grudzinskas G. 2010. Fate of fertilized human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 21:732-741.
7. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 57:289-300.
8. Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth SF. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol. 24:280-288.
9. Bowcock AM, et al. 1994. High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368:455-457.
10. Calsbeek R, Sinervo B. 2004. Within-clutch variation in offspring sex determined by differences in sire body size: cryptic mate choice in the wild. J Evol Biol. 17:464-470.
11. Charlesworth B, Jordan CY, Charlesworth D. 2014. The evolutionary dynamics of sexually antagonistic mutations in pseudoautosomal regions of sex chromosomes. Evolution 68:1339-1350.
12. Crans G, Shuster J. 2008. How conservative is Fisher's exact test? A quantitative evaluation of the two-sample comparative binomial trial. Stat Med. 27:3598-3611.
13. Delcourt M, Blows MW, Rundle HD. 2009. Sexually antagonistic genetic variance for fitness in an ancestral and a novel environment. Proc R Soc B. 276:2009-2014.
14. Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA. 2004. Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness. Nature 429:65-67.
15. Fenner JN. 2005. Cross-cultural estimation of the human generation interval for use in genetics-based population divergence studies. Am J Phys Anthropol. 128:415-423.
16. Foerster K, et al. 2007. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature 447:1107-1110.
17. Fry JD. 2010. The genomic location of sexually antagonistic variation: some cautionary comments. Evolution 64:1510-1516.
18. Gibson JR, Chippindale AK, RiceWR. 2002. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc R Soc B. 269:499-505.
19. Grimwood J, et al. 2004. The DNA sequence and biology of human chromosome 19. Nature 428:529-535.
20. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. 2009. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 4:44-57.
21. Innocenti P, Morrow EH. 2010. The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000335.
22. Ioannidis JPA. 2008. Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology 19:640-648.
23. Karolchik D, et al. 2008. The UCSC genome browser database: 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:D773-D779.
24. Kidwell JF, Clegg MT, Stewart FM, Prout T. 1977. Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in the two sexes under random mating. Genetics 85:171-183.
25. Kirkpatrick M, Guerrero RF. 2014. Signatures of sex-antagonistic selection on recombining sex chromosomes. Genetics 197:531-541.
26. Klein SL. 2012. Immune cells have sex and so should journal articles. Endocrinology 153:2544-2550.
27. Long TAF, Rice WR. 2007. Adult locomotory activity mediates intralocus sexual conflict in a laboratory-adapted population of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Biol Sci. 274:3105-3112.
28. Marriott I, Huet-Hudson YM. 2006. Sexual dimorphism in innate immune responses to infectious organisms. Immunol Res. 34:177-192.
29. Merila J, Sheldon B, Ellegren H. 1998. Quantitative genetics of sexual size dimorphism in the collared flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. Evolution 52:870-876.
30. Nookaew I, et al. 2013. Adipose tissue resting energy expenditure and expression of genes involved in mitochondrial function are higher in women than in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 98:E370-E378.
31. Otto SP, et al. 2011. About PAR: the distinct evolutionary dynamics of the pseudoautosomal region. Trends Genet. 27:358-367.
32. Pemberton TJ, Wang C, Li JZ, Rosenberg NA. 2010. Inference of unexpected genetic relatedness among individuals in HapMap Phase III. Am J Hum Genet. 87:457-464.
33. Price DK, Burley NT. 1993. Constraints on the evolution of attractive traits: genetic (co)variance of zebra finch bill colour. Heredity (Edinb) 71:405-412.
34. Price DK, Burley NT. 1994. Constraints on the evolution of attractive traits: selection in male and female zebra finches. Am Nat. 144:908-934.
35. Pritchard JK, Przeworski M. 2001. Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am J Hum Genet. 69:1-14.
36. Purcell S, et al. 2007. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 81: 559-575.
37. Qiu S, Bergero R, Charlesworth D. 2013. Testing for the footprint of sexually antagonistic polymorphisms in the pseudoautosomal region of a plant sex chromosome pair. Genetics 194:663-672.
38. Rice WR. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735-742.
39. Shi H, Clegg DJ. 2009. Sex differences in the regulation of body weight. Physiol Behav. 97:199-204.
40. Stewart AD, Pischedda A, Rice WR. 2010. Resolving intralocus sexual conflict: genetic mechanisms and time frame. J Hered. 101: S94-S99.
41. Stulp G, Kuijper B, Buunk AP, Pollet TV, Verhulst S. 2012. Intralocus sexual conflict over human height. Biol Lett. 8:976-978.
42. Ucisik-Akkaya E, et al. 2010. Examination of genetic polymorphisms in newborns for signatures of sex-specific prenatal selection. Mol Hum Reprod. 16:770-777.
43. van Doorn GS. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1168:52-71.
44. Weir BS. 1996. Genetic data analysis II. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.