Stakeholder consensus on the purpose of clinical evaluation of electronic health records is required

Health Policy and Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 152-160

  Ericson, Lisa ^a   Hammar, Tora ^a   Schönström, Nils ^a   Petersson, Göran ^a  

^a LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Electronic health record; Evaluation; Healthcare; Information technology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MANAGER; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; ONLINE SYSTEM; PATIENT SAFETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK MANAGEMENT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SWEDEN;

EID: 85014821468     PISSN: 22118837     EISSN: 22118845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2017.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Huckvale, C., Car, J., Akiyama, M., et al. Information technology for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 19:Suppl 2 (2010), i25–i33.
2. Black, A.D., Car, J., Pagliari, C., et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med, 8(1), 2011, e1000387.
3. ISO/TR 20514. Health informatics – Electronic health record – Definition, scope and context; 2005.
4. Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., Nykänen, P., Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform 77:5 (2008), 291–304.
5. Roukema, J., Los, R.K., Bleeker, S.E., van Ginneken, A.M., van der Lei, J., Moll, H.A., Paper versus computer: feasibility of an electronic medical record in general pediatrics. Pediatrics 117:1 (2006), 15–21.
6. Ancker, J.S., Kern, L.M., Edwards, A., et al. Associations between healthcare quality and use of electronic health record functions in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 22:4 (2015), 864–871.
7. Keasberry, J., Scott, I.A., Sullivan, C., Staib, A., Ashby, R., Going digital: a narrative overview of the clinical and organisational impacts of eHealth technologies in hospital practice. Aust Health Rev, 2017, 10.1071/AH16233.
8. Cresswell, K.M., Bates, D.W., Sheikh, A., Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 20:e1 (2013), e9–e13.
9. Park, S.Y., Lee, S.Y., Chen, Y., The effects of EMR deployment on doctors׳ work practices: a qualitative study in the emergency department of a teaching hospital. Int J Med Inform 81:3 (2012), 204–217.
10. Roman, L.C., Ancker, J.S., Johnson, S.B., Senathirajah, Y., Navigation in the electronic health record: a review of the safety and usability literature. J Biomed Inform, 2017, 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.01.005.
11. Boonstra, A., Broekhuis, M., Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv Res, 10, 2010, 231.
12. Janols, R., Lind, T., Göransson, B., Sandblad, B., Evaluation of user adoption during three module deployments of region-wide electronic patient record systems. Int J Med Inform 83:6 (2014), 438–449.
13. Khajouei, R., de Jongh, D., Jaspers, M.W., Usability evaluation of a computerized physician order entry for medication ordering. Stud Health Technol Inform 150 (2009), 532–536.
14. Yen, P.Y., Bakken, S., Review of health information technology usability study methodologies. J Am Med Inform Assoc 19:3 (2012), 413–422.
15. Odukoya, O.K., Chui, M.A., e-Prescribing: characterisation of patient safety hazards in community pharmacies using a sociotechnical systems approach. BMJ Qual Saf 22:10 (2013), 816–825.
16. Jaana, M., Ward, M.M., Bahensky, J.A., EMRs and clinical IS implementation in hospitals: a statewide survey. J Rural Health 28:1 (2012), 34–43.
17. Harvey, J., Avery, A.J., Hibberd, R., Barber, N., Meeting user needs in national healthcare systems: lessons from early adopter community pharmacists using the electronic prescriptions service. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 14, 2014, 16.
18. Redwood, S., Rajakumar, A., Hodson, J., Coleman, J.J., Does the implementation of an electronic prescribing system create unintended medication errors? A study of the sociotechnical context through the analysis of reported medication incidents. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 11, 2011, 29.
19. Sittig, D.F., Gonzalez, D., Singh, H., Contingency planning for electronic health record-based care continuity: a survey of recommended practices. Int J Med Inform 83:11 (2014), 797–804.
20. Karsh, B.T., Weinger, M.B., Abbott, P.A., Wears, R.L., Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17:6 (2010), 617–623.
21. Ammenwerth, E., Brender, J., Nykänen, P., et al. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems. Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int J Med Inform 73:6 (2004), 479–491.
22. Niinimäki, J., Forsström, J., Approaches for certification of electronic prescription software. Int J Med Inform 47:3 (1997), 175–182.
23. Koppel, R., Wetterneck, T., Telles, J.L., Karsh, B.T., Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc 15:4 (2008), 408–423.
24. Vest, J.R., More than just a question of technology: factors related to hospitals׳ adoption and implementation of health information exchange. Int J Med Inform 79:12 (2010), 797–806.
25. Cresswell, K., Sheikh, A., Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. Int J Med Inform 82:5 (2013), e73–e86.
26. Jokela, P., Karlsudd, P., Östlund, M., Theory, method and tools for evaluation using a systems-based approach. Electron J Inf Syst Eval 3:11 (2008), 197–212.
27. The Swedish Medical Products Agency. Medical Information Systems – guidance for qualification and classification of standalone software with a medical purpose. Uppsala, Sweden; 2012.
28. Ericson L, Schönström N, Petersson G. Klinisk utvärdering av medicinska informationssystem – Fokus på elektroniska patientjournalsystem (In Swedish). eHealth Institute, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden. Available at: lnu.se/ehalsoinstitutet; 2014.
29. Hollmark, M., Lefevre Skjöldebrand, A., Andersson, C., Lindblad, R., Technology Ready to be Launched, but is there a Payer? Challenges for Implementing eHealth in Sweden. Stud Health Technol Inform 211 (2015), 57–68.
30. Swedish Government Official Reports. Nästa fas i e-hälsoarbetet: en diskussionspromemoria från e-hälsokommittén (In Swedish). SOU 2015:32. Stockholm; 2015.
31. Swedish Government Official Reports. Gör det enklare! Slutbetänkande av Statens vård- och omsorgsutredning (In Swedish, including a summary in English). SOU 2012:33. Stockholm; 2012.
32. Graneheim, U.H., Lundman, B., Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 24:2 (2004), 105–112.
33. Angst, C.M., Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., Kelley, K., Social contagion and information technology diffusion: the adoption of electronic medical records in U.S. Hospitals. Manag Sci 56:8 (2010), 1219–1241.
34. Noblin, A., Cortelyou-Ward, K., Cantiello, J., et al. EHR implementation in a new clinic: a case study of clinician perceptions. J Med Syst, 37(4), 2013, 9955.
35. Jones, E.B., Factors associated with electronic health record use among nurse practitioners in the United States. J Ambul Care Manag 40:1 (2017), 48–58.
36. Ben-Assuli, O., Electronic health records, adoption, quality of care, legal and privacy issues and their implementation in emergency departments. Health Policy 119:3 (2015), 287–297.
37. Riahi, S., Fischler, I., Stuckey, M.I., Klassen, P.E., Chen, J., The value of electronic medical record implementation in mental health care: a case study. JMIR Med Inform, 5(1), 2017, e1.
38. Ben-Assuli, O., Leshno, M., Assessing electronic health record systems in emergency departments: using a decision analytic Bayesian model. Health Inform J 22:3 (2016), 712–729.
39. Ben-Assuli, O., Ziv, A., Sagi, D., Ironi, A., Leshno, M., Cost-effectiveness evaluation of EHR: simulation of an abdominal aortic aneurysm in the emergency department. J Med Syst, 40(6), 2016, 141.
40. Caine, K., Hanania, R., Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 20:1 (2013), 7–15.
41. The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Nationell eHälsa – strategin för tillgänglig och säker information inom vård och omsorg (In Swedish). Stockholm; 2010.
42. Oliveira, M., Novaes, M., Vasconcelos, A., Using ISO 25040 standard for evaluating electronic health record systems. Stud Health Technol Inform, 192, 2013, 1137.
43. D׳Amore, J.D., Mandel, J.C., Kreda, D.A., et al. Are Meaningful Use Stage 2 certified EHRs ready for interoperability? Findings from the SMART C-CDA Collaborative. J Am Med Inform Assoc 21:6 (2014), 1060–1068.
44. Vest, J.R., Yoon, J., Bossak, B.H., Changes to the electronic health records market in light of health information technology certification and meaningful use. J Am Med Inform Assoc 20:2 (2013), 227–232.