Evaluation of user adoption during three module deployments of region-wide electronic patient record systems

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 83, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 438-449

  Janols, Rebecka ^a   Lind, Thomas ^a   Göransson, Bengt ^a   Sandblad, Bengt ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Hospital information systems; Human computer interaction; Medical health record, Computerized; Medical informatics; Organisational change; Technology adoption

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; SURVEYS;

ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC PATIENT RECORD SYSTEM; END USER INVOLVEMENT; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MEDICAL HEALTH; ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE; ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EXPECTATION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LEARNING; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESPONSIBILITY; TELEHEALTH; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRESCRIPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS; SWEDEN; UTILIZATION;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DRUG PRESCRIPTIONS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; SWEDEN;

EID: 84900482787     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Schoen C., et al. A survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 2009: perspectives on care, costs and experiences. Health Aff. (Millwood) 2009, 28(6):w1171-w1183.
2. Jerlvall L., Pehrsson T. ehälsa i Landstinget 2011.
3. Janols R. Time does not heal usability issues! Results from a longitudinal evaluation of a health it deployment performed at three Swedish hospital units. Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference 2012, 273-280. ACM, Melbourne, Australia.
4. Janols R., Göransson B. Same system-different experiences: physicians' and nurses' experiences in using IT systems. Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference 2011, 166-172. ACM, Canberra, Australia.
5. Janols R., et al. Physicians' concept of time usage - a key concern in EPR deployment. E-Health 2010, 71-81. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. H. Takeda (Ed.).
6. Janols R., Göransson B., Sandblad B. Three key concerns for a successful EPR deployment and usage. International Conference of the European Federation for Medical Informatics (MIE) 2011, 260-264. IOS press, Oslo, Norway. A. Moen (Ed.).
7. Axelsson K., Melin U., Söderström F. Analyzing best practice and critical success factors in a health information system case - are there any shortcuts to successful IT implementation?. European Conference on Information Systems 2011, AIS Electronic Library, Helsinki, Finland.
8. Davenport T.H. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1998, 76(4):121-131.
9. Markus L., Tanis C. The enterprise system experience - from adoption to success. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past 2000, 173-207. Pinnaflex Educational Resources. R.W. Zmud, M.F. Price (Eds.).
10. Light B., Holland P.C., Wills K. ERP and best of breed: a comparative analysis. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2001, 7(3):216-224.
11. Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int. J. Med. Inf. 1999, 55(2):87-101.
12. Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2001, 64(2-3):143-156.
13. Berg M. Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology in Health Care Work 2004, Routledge, London.
14. van der Meijden M.J., Tange H., Troost J., Hasman A. Development and implementation of an EPR: how to encourage the user. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2001, 64:173-185.
15. Kitzmiller R.R., Anderson R.A., McDaniel R.R. Making sense of health information technology implementation: a qualitative study protocol. Implement. Sci. 2010, 5(95):1-8.
16. Aarts J., Peel V. Using a descriptive model of change when implementing large scale clinical information systems to identify priorities for further research. Int. J. Med. Inf. 1999, 56(1-3):43-50.
17. Aarts J., Peel V., Wright G. Organizational issues in health informatics: a model approach. Int. J. Med. Inf. 1998, 52:235-242.
18. Callen J.L., Braithwaite J., Westbrook J.I. Cultures in hospitals and their influence on attitudes to, and satisfaction with, the use of clinical information systems. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007, 65(3):635-639.
19. Callen J.L., Braithwaite J., Westbrook J.I. Contextual implementation model: a framework for assisting clinical information system implementations. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008, 15(2):255-262.
20. Effken J.A. Different lenses, improved outcomes: a new approach to the analysis and design of healthcare information systems. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2001, 65(1):59-74.
21. Lorenzi N., Riley R.T. Managing change: an overview. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2000, 7(2):116-124.
22. Lorenzi N.M., Riley R.T. Managing Technological Change: Organizational Aspects of Health Informatics 2004, Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
23. Nilsson A. Managing IT implementation processes. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 2007, 2:41-57.
24. Kukafka R., et al. Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioural science: a systematic analysis of the literature on IT use. J. Biomed. Inform. 2003, 36(3):218-227.
25. Leonard K.J. Critical success factors relating to healthcare's adoption of new technology: a guide to increasing the likelihood of successful implementation. ElectronicHealthcare 2004, 2(4):72-81.
26. Sumner M., Bradley J. Critical success factors in best of breed ERP implementation. 18th Information Resource Management International Conference (IRMA) 2007.
27. Poon P., Wagner C. Critical success factors revisited: success and failure cases of information systems for senior executives. Decis. Support Syst. 2001, 30:393-418.
28. Aggestam L., Laere J.v. How to successfully apply critical success factors in healthcare information systems development? A story from the field. European Conference on Information Systems 2012, AIS Electronic Library, Barcelona, Spain.
29. Pinelle D., Gutwin C. Loose coupling and healthcare organizations: deployment strategies for groupware. Comput. Support. Cooperat. Work (CSCW) 2006, 15(5):537-572.
30. Gulliksen J., et al. Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2003, 22(6):397-409.
31. Høstgaard A.M., Bertelsen P., Nøhr C. Methods to identify, study and understand end-user participation in HIT development. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2011, 11(57.).
32. Kanstrup A.M., Bertelsen P. Participatory IT-support. Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design: Expanding Boundaries in Design 2006, 87-94. ACM, Trento, Italy.
33. Aarts J., et al. Information technology in health care: socio-technical approaches. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2010, 79(6):389-390.
34. Balka E., et al. Socio-technical challenges in implementing safe patient handovers. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2010, 157:206-212.
35. Baxter G., Sommerville I. Socio-technical systems: from design methods to system engineering. Interact. Comput. 2011, 23(1):14.
36. Boulus N. Sociotechnical changes brought about by electronic medical record. AMCIS 2009 Proceedings 2009.
37. Lluch M. Healthcare professionals' organisational barriers to health information technologies - a literature review. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2011, 80(12):849-862.
38. Balka E., Kahnamoui N., Nutland K. Who is in charge of patient safety? Work practice, work processes and utopian views of automatic drug dispensing systems. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2007, 76:S48-S57.
39. Berg M., et al. Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context. Int. J. Med. Inf. 1998, 52(52):243-251.
40. Kavathatzopoulos I. Assessing usability of IT systems. Nordic Ergonomics Society 2012, KTH, Stockholm. A.-B. Antonsson, K. Vogel, G.M. Hägg (Eds.).
41. Ash J.S., Berg M., Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2004, 11(2):104-112.
42. Harrison M., Koppel R., Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care - an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007, 14:542-549.
43. Janols R. Evolving systems - engaged users: key principles for improving region-wide health IT adoption. Department of Information Technology 2013, Uppsala University, Uppsala.