Historical carbon dioxide emissions caused by land-use changes are possibly larger than assumed

Nature Geoscience

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 79-84

  Arneth, A ^a   Sitch, S ^b   Pongratz, J ^c   Stocker, B D ^d,e   Ciais, P ^f   Poulter, B ^g   Bayer, A D ^a   Bondeau, A ^h   Calle, L ^g   Chini, L P ⁱ   Gasser, T ^f   Fader, M ^j   Friedlingstein, P ^b   Kato, E ^k   Li, W ^f   Lindeskog, M ^l   Nabel, J E M S ^c   Pugh, T A M ^a,m   Robertson, E ⁿ   Viovy, N ^f   Yue, C ^f   Zaehle, S ^o   more..

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR METEOROLOGY   (Germany)

^d IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e Land Climate Dynamics Group   (Switzerland)

^f DIF   (France)

^g NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

^h AVIGNON UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^j FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF HYDROLOGY   (Germany)

^k INSTITUTE OF APPLIED ENERGY   (Japan)

^l LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^m UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ Met Ofiice Hadley Centre   (United Kingdom)

^o MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOGEOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE; BIOSPHERE; CARBON CYCLE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON FLUX; CARBON SINK; LAND USE CHANGE; REFORESTATION; SHIFTING CULTIVATION; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM;

EID: 85014768533     PISSN: 17520894     EISSN: 17520908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2882     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Le Quere, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2015. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 7, 349-396 (2015).
2. Sitch, S. et al. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Biogeosciences 12, 653-679 (2015).
3. Ciais, P. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 6 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
4. Pongratz, J., Reick, C., Houghton, R. A. & House, J. I. Terminology as a key uncertainty in net land use flux estimates. Earth Syst. Dyn. 5, 177-195 (2013).
5. Gasser, T. & Ciais, P. A theoretical framework for the net land to atmosphere CO2 flux and its implications in the definitions of "emissions from land-use change". Earth Syst. Dyn. 4, 171-186 (2013).
6. Houghton, R. A. et al. Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change. Biogeosciences 9, 5125-5142 (2012).
7. Hurtt, G. C. et al. Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500-2100, 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands. Climatic Change 109, 117-161 (2011).
8. Fuchs, R., Herold, M., Verburg, P. H., Clevers, J. G. P. W. & Eberle, J. Gross changes in reconstructions of historic land cover/use for Europe between 1900 and 2010. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 299-313 (2015).
9. Hansen, M. C., Stehman, S. V. & Potapov, P. V. Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8650-8655 (2010).
10. Poorter, L. et al. Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests. Nature 530, 211-214 (2016).
11. van Vliet, N. et al. Trends, drivers and impacts of changes in swidden cultivation in tropical forest-agriculture frontiers: A global assessment. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 418-429 (2012).
12. Grace, J., Mitchard, E. & Gloor, E. Perturbations in the carbon budget of the tropics. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 3238-3255 (2014).
13. Erb, K. H. et al. Land management: data availability and process understanding for global change studies. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 512-533 (2016).
14. Hurtt, G. C. et al. The underpinnings of land-use history: Three centuries of global gridded land-use transitions, wood-harvest activity, and resulting secondary lands. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 1208-1229 (2006).
15. Noormets, A. et al. Effects of forest management on productivity and carbon sequestration: A review and hypothesis. Forest Ecol. Manage. 355, 124-140 (2015).
16. Pugh, T. A. M. et al. Carbon emission from land-use change is substantially enhanced by agricultural management. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 124008 (2015).
17. Guo, L. B. & Gifford, R. M. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: A meta analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 8, 345-360 (2002).
18. Powlson, D. S. et al. Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 678-683 (2014).
19. Shevliakova, E. et al. Carbon cycling under 300 years of land use change: Importance of the secondary vegetation sink. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23, GB2022 (2009).
20. Stocker, B. D., Feissli, F., Strassmann, K. M., Spahni, R. & Joos, F. Past and future carbon fluxes from land use change, shifting cultivation and wood harvest. Tellus B 66, 23188 (2014).
21. Wilkenskjeld, S., Kloster, S., Pongratz, J., Raddatz, T. & Reick, C. H. Comparing the influence of net and gross anthropogenic land-use and land-cover changes on the carbon cycle in the MPI-ESM. Biogeosciences 11, 4817-4828 (2014).
22. Friend, A. D. et al. Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3280-3285 (2014).
23. Hansis, E., Davis, S. J. & Pongratz, J. Relevance of methodological choices for accounting of land use change carbon fluxes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 1230-1246 (2015).
24. Pan, Y. et al. A Large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests. Science 333, 988-993 (2011).
25. Ahlström, A. et al. The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink. Science 348, 895-899 (2015).
26. Erb, K. H. et al. Bias in attributing of forest carbon sinks. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 854-856 (2013).
27. Schimel, D., Stephens, B. B. & Fisher, J. B. Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 436-441 (2015).
28. Ehlers, I. et al. Detecting long-term metabolic shifts using isotopomers: CO2-driven suppression of photorespiration in C-3 plants over the 20th century. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15585-15590 (2015).
29. Sun, Y. et al. Impact of mesophyll diffusion on estimated global land CO2 fertilization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15774-15779 (2014).
30. Welp, L. R. et al. Interannual variability in the oxygen isotopes of atmospheric CO2 driven by El Niño. Nature 477, 579-582 (2011).
31. Ciais, P. et al. Large inert carbon pool in the terrestrial biosphere during the Last Glacial Maximum. Nat. Geosci. 5, 74-79 (2012).
32. Beer, C. et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329, 834-838 (2010).
33. McMahon, S. M., Geoffrey G Parker, and Dawn R Miller. 2010. Evidence for a recent increase in forest growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3611-3615 (2010).
34. van der Sleen, P. et al. No growth stimulation of tropical trees by 150 years of CO2 fertilization but water-use efficiency increased. Nat. Geosci. 8, 24-28 (2015).
35. Pugh, T. A. M., Muller, C., Arneth, A., Haverd, V. & Smith, B. Key knowledge and data gaps in modelling the influence of CO2 concentration on the terrestrial carbon sink. J. Plant Phys. 203, 3-15 (2016).
36. Raymond, P. A. et al. Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature 503, 355-359 (2013).
37. Regnier, P. et al. Anthropogenic perturbation of the carbon fluxes from land to ocean. Nat. Geosci. 6, 597-607 (2013).
38. Prestele, R. et al. Hotspots of uncertainty in land use and land cover change projections: A global scale model comparison. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 3967-3983 (2016).
39. Bais, A. L. S., Lauk, C., Kastner, T. & Erb, K. Global patterns and trends of wood harvest and use between 1990 and 2010. Ecol. Econ. 119, 326-337 (2015).
40. McGrath, M. J. et al. Reconstructing European forest management from 1600 to 2010. Biogeosciences 12, 4291-4316 (2015).
41. Richter, D. D. & Houghton, R. A. Gross CO2 fluxes from land-use change: implications for reducing global emissions and increasing sinks. Carbon Manage. 2, 41-47 (2011).
42. Bayer, A. D., Lindeskog, M., Pugh, T. A. M., Fuchs, R. & Arneth, A. Uncertainties in the land use flux resulting from land use change reconstructions and gross land transitions. Earth Syst. Dyn. Discuss. http://dx. doi. org/10. 5194/esd-2016-24 (2016).
43. Korner, C. Slow in, rapid out - carbon flux studies and Kyoto targets. Science 300, 1242-1243 (2003).
44. Krause, A., Pugh, T. A. M., Bayer, A. D., Lindeskog, M. & Arneth, A. Impacts of land-use history on the recovery of ecosystems after agricultural abandonment. Earth Syst. Dyn. 7, 745-766 (2016).
45. Zaehle, S., Jones, C. D., Houlton, B., Lamarque, J. F. & Robertson, E. Nitrogen availability reduces CMIP5 projections of twenty first century land carbon uptake. J. Clim. 28, 2494-2511 (2015).
46. Seidl, R., Schelhaas, M. J., Rammer, W. & Verkerk, P. J. Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 806-810 (2014).
47. Hantson, S. et al. The status and challenge of global fire modelling. Biogeosciences 13, 3359-3375 (2016).
48. Running, S. W. Ecosystem disturbance, carbon, and climate. Science 321, 652-653 (2008).
49. Galik, C. S., Murray, B. C., Mitchell, S. & Cottle, P. Alternative approaches for addressing non-permanence in carbon projects: An application to afforestation and reforestation under the Clean Development Mechanism. Mit. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Change 21, 101-118 (2016).
50. Friess, D. A., Phelps, J., Garmendia, E. & Gomez-Baggethun, E. Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the face of external biophysical stressors. Glob. Environ. Change 30, 31-42 (2015).