Impact of mesophyll diffusion on estimated global land CO2 fertilization

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 44, 2014, Pages 15774-15779

  Sun, Ying ^a   Gu, Lianhong ^b   Dickinson, Robert E ^a   Norby, Richard J ^b   Pallardy, Stephen G ^c   Hoffman, Forrest M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^d OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon cycle; Co2 fertilization; Gross primary production; Mesophyll conductance; Photosynthetic model

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; BIOSPHERE; CARBON CYCLE; CARBON DIOXIDE FERTILIZATION; CARBOXYLATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; DIFFUSION; GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION; GROWTH RATE; LEAF GAS EXCHANGE; LEAF STRUCTURE; MESOPHYLL; NONHUMAN; PHOTOSYNTHETIC PHOTON FLUX DENSITY; VEGETATION; XYLEM; ATMOSPHERE; CHEMISTRY; CHLOROPLAST; METABOLISM; PLANT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ATMOSPHERE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CHLOROPLASTS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PLANTS;

EID: 84914689917     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418075111     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. 2 diffusion in leaves of higher-plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 13(2):281-292.
2. 2. Trends Ecol Evol 26(3):136-142.
3. 2 diffusion pathway inside leaves. J Exp Bot 60(8):2235-2248.
4. Bernacchi CJ, Portis AR, Nakano H, von Caemmerer S, Long SP (2002) Temperature response of mesophyll conductance. Implications for the determination of Rubisco enzyme kinetics and for limitations to photosynthesis in vivo. Plant Physiol 130(4): 1992-1998.
5. 2 transfer. J Exp Bot 59(7):1475-1487.
6. Niinemets U, Díaz-Espejo A, Flexas J, Galmés J, Warren CR (2009a) Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field. J Exp Bot 60(8):2249-2270.
7. Niinemets U, Díaz-Espejo A, Flexas J, Galmés J, Warren CR (2009b) Importance of mesophyll diffusion conductance in estimation of plant photosynthesis in the field. J Exp Bot 60(8):2271-2282.
8. 2: An unappreciated central player in photosynthesis. Plant Sci 193-194:70-84.
9. Sharkey TD (2012) Virtual special issue on [corrected] mesophyll conductance: Constraint on carbon acquisition by C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ 35(11):1881-1883.
10. Taylor KE, Meehl GA, Stouffer RJ (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(4):485-498.
11. 2132.
12. 3 species. Planta 149(1):78-90.
13. Long SP, Bernacchi CJ (2003) Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. J Exp Bot 54(392):2393-2401.
14. 3) leaves. Plant Cell Environ 30(9):1035-1040.
15. Sun Y, et al. (2014) Asymmetrical effects of mesophyll conductance on fundamental photosynthetic parameters and their relationships estimated from leaf gas exchange measurements. Plant Cell Environ 37(4):978-994.
16. Evans JR, von Caemmerer S (2013) Temperature response of carbon isotope discrimination and mesophyll conductance in tobacco. Plant Cell Environ 36(4):745-756.
17. 2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry leaf photosynthesis model. Plant Cell Environ27(2):137-153.
18. Bonan GB, et al. (2011) Improving canopy processes in the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4) using global flux fields empirically inferred from FLUXNET data. J Geophys Res 116(G2):G02014.
19. Oleson KW, et al. (2013) Technical description of version 4.5 of the community land model (CLM). NCAR Technical Note . Available at www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/ cesm1.2/clm/. AccessedOctober2, 2013.
20. 3 leaf photosynthesis-intercellular carbon dioxide response curves. Plant Cell Environ 33(11):1852-1874.
21. Friedlingstein P, et al. (2014) Uncertainties in CMIP5 climate projections due to carbon cycle feedbacks. J Clim 27(2):511-526.
22. Hoffman FM, et al. (2014) Causes and implications of persistent atmospheric carbon dioxide biases in Earth System Models. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 119(2):141-162.
23. Waring RH, Landsberg JJ, Williams M (1998) Net primary production of forests: A constant fraction of gross primary production? Tree Physiol 18(2):129-134.
24. Keeling CD, Whorf TP, Wahlen M, van der Plichtt J (1995) Interannual extremes in the rate of rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide since 1980. Nature 375(6533):666-670.
25. Friend AD, et al. (2014) Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(9):3280-3285.
26. 2 fluxes from trees reflect underlying physiological processes. New Phytol 197(2):353-355.
27. Zhang Q, Pitman AJ, Wang YP, Dai YJ, Lawrence PJ (2013) The impact of nitrogen and phosphorous limitation on the estimated terrestrial carbon balance and warming of land use change over the last 156 yr. Earth System Dynamics 4(2):333-345.
28. Pan Y, et al. (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests. Science 333(6045):988-993.
29. 2, climate and land use effects with four process-based models. Global Biogeochem Cycles 15(1):183-206.
30. Keenan TF, et al. (2013) Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. Nature 499(7458):324-327.
31. 2 by northern ecosystemssince 1960. Science 341(6150):1085-1089.
32. 2 diffusion. J Exp Bot 57(2):343-354.
33. 2. New Phytol 165(2):351-371.
34. Wang YP, Polglase PJ (1995) Carbon balance in the tundra, boreal forest and humid tropical forest during climate change: Scaling up from leaf physiology and soil carbon dynamics. Plant Cell Environ 18(10):1226-1244.
35. th century. Geophys Res Lett 38(22):L22701.