Design principles for new systems of assessment

Phi Delta Kappan

Volumn 98, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 47-52

  Shepard, Lorrie A ^a   Penuel, William R ^a   Davidson, Kristen L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014714007     PISSN: 00317217     EISSN: 19406487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0031721717696478     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Bang M., Medin D., (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94 (6), 1008–1026.
2. Black P., Harrison C., Lee C., Marshall B., Wiliam D., (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
3. Black P., Wiliam D., (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5 (1), 7–74.
4. Clark-Ibañez M., (2004). Framing the social world with photo-elicitation interviews. The Behavioral Scientist, 47 (12), 1507–1527.
5. Deming W.E., (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. diSessa A.A., (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In Forman G., Pufall P., (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (Vol. 49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Elmore R.F., (2003). Accountability and capacity. In Carnoy M., Elmore R.F., Siskin L.S., (Eds.), The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing (pp. 195–209). New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
8. Gravemeijer K., (2004). Local instruction theories as means of support for teachers in reform mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6 (2), 105–128.
9. Pellegrino J.W., Wilson M.R., Koenig J.A., Beatty A.S., (Eds.) (2014). Developing assessments for the next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
10. Penuel W.R., DeBarger A.H., Boscardin C.K., Moorthy S., Beauvineau Y., Kennedy C., Allison K., (2017). Investigating science curriculum adaptation as a strategy to improve teaching and learning. Science Education, 101 (1), 66–98.
11. Penuel W.R., Shepard L.A., (2016). Assessment and teaching. In Gitomer D.H., Bell C.A., (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 787–850). Washington, DC: AERA.
12. Senge P., (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
13. Shepard L.A., Davidson K.L., Bowman R., (2011). How middle school mathematics teachers use interim and benchmark assessment data. CSE Technical Report 807. Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
14. Simon M.A., (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26 (2), 114–145.
15. Smith C.L., Wiser M., Anderson C.W., Krajcik J., (2006). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic-molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 4 (1&2), 1–98.