메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

Methods of defining the non-inferiority margin in randomized, double-blind controlled trials: A systematic review

Author keywords

Drug regulation; Methodology; Non inferiority margin; Non inferiority trials

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EDITOR; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LOGLINEAR MODEL; MEDLINE; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; EQUIVALENCE TRIAL (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

EID: 85014701687     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-1859-x     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (69)

References (25)
  • 1
    • 80052225207 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publication of noninferiority clinical trials: changes over a 20-year interval
    • Suda KJ, Hurley AM, McKibbin T, Motl Moroney SE. Publication of noninferiority clinical trials: changes over a 20-year interval. Pharmacotherapy. 2011;31(9):833-9.
    • (2011) Pharmacotherapy , vol.31 , Issue.9 , pp. 833-839
    • Suda, K.J.1    Hurley, A.M.2    McKibbin, T.3    Motl Moroney, S.E.4
  • 2
    • 85014701535 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance for Industry Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials
    • Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed 15 Oct 2014
    • Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for Industry Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2010. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/./Guidances/UCM202140.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2014.
    • 2010
  • 3
    • 84871529395 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to use a noninferiority trial: users' guides to the medical literature
    • Mulla SM, Scott IA, Jackevicius CA, You JJ, Guyatt GH. How to use a noninferiority trial: users' guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 2012;308(24):2605-11.
    • (2012) JAMA , vol.308 , Issue.24 , pp. 2605-2611
    • Mulla, S.M.1    Scott, I.A.2    Jackevicius, C.A.3    You, J.J.4    Guyatt, G.H.5
  • 4
    • 84931095567 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Noninferiority trials: is a new treatment almost as effective as another?
    • Kaji AH, Lewis RJ. Noninferiority trials: is a new treatment almost as effective as another? JAMA. 2015;313(23):2371-2.
    • (2015) JAMA , vol.313 , Issue.23 , pp. 2371-2372
    • Kaji, A.H.1    Lewis, R.J.2
  • 5
    • 0003875321 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: statistical principles for clinical trials (E9)
    • ICH. Accessed 15 Oct 2014
    • ICH Expert Working Group. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: statistical principles for clinical trials (E9). ICH. 1998. http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E9/Step4/E9_Guideline.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2014.
    • (1998)
  • 6
    • 85014633198 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: choice of control group in clinical trials (E 10)
    • ICH. Accessed 15 Oct 2014
    • ICH Expert Working Group. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: choice of control group in clinical trials (E 10). ICH. 2000. http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E10/Step4/E10_Guideline.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2014.
    • (2000)
  • 7
    • 85014667110 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guideline on the choice of the non-inferiority margin
    • Accessed 15 Oct 2014
    • Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Guideline on the choice of the non-inferiority margin. European Medicines Agency. 2005. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003636.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2014.
    • (2005) European Medicines Agency
  • 8
    • 33644789375 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials
    • Le Henanff A, Giraudeau B, Baron G, Ravaud P. Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. JAMA. 2006;295(10):1147-51.
    • (2006) JAMA , vol.295 , Issue.10 , pp. 1147-1151
    • Henanff, A.1    Giraudeau, B.2    Baron, G.3    Ravaud, P.4
  • 9
    • 78149435107 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Room for improvement in conducting and reporting non-inferiority randomized controlled trials on drugs: a systematic review
    • Wangge G, Klungel OH, Roes KC, de Boer A, Hoes AW, Knol MJ. Room for improvement in conducting and reporting non-inferiority randomized controlled trials on drugs: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013550.
    • (2010) PLoS One , vol.5 , Issue.10
    • Wangge, G.1    Klungel, O.H.2    Roes, K.C.3    Boer, A.4    Hoes, A.W.5    Knol, M.J.6
  • 10
    • 84869001712 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality of reporting of clinical non-inferiority and equivalence randomised trials--update and extension
    • Schiller P, Burchardi N, Niestroj M, Kieser M. Quality of reporting of clinical non-inferiority and equivalence randomised trials--update and extension. Trials. 2012;13:214. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-214.
    • (2012) Trials , vol.13 , pp. 214
    • Schiller, P.1    Burchardi, N.2    Niestroj, M.3    Kieser, M.4
  • 11
    • 84877063044 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Deficient reporting and interpretation of non-inferiority randomized clinical trials in HIV patients: a systematic review
    • Hernandez AV, Pasupuleti V, Deshpande A, Thota P, Collins JA, Vidal JE. Deficient reporting and interpretation of non-inferiority randomized clinical trials in HIV patients: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e63272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063272.
    • (2013) PLoS One , vol.8 , Issue.5
    • Hernandez, A.V.1    Pasupuleti, V.2    Deshpande, A.3    Thota, P.4    Collins, J.A.5    Vidal, J.E.6
  • 12
    • 84924519573 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparing vaccines: a systematic review of the use of the non-inferiority margin in vaccine trials
    • Donken R, de Melker HE, Rots NY, Berbers G, Knol MJ. Comparing vaccines: a systematic review of the use of the non-inferiority margin in vaccine trials. Vaccine. 2015;33(12):1426-32.
    • (2015) Vaccine , vol.33 , Issue.12 , pp. 1426-1432
    • Donken, R.1    Melker, H.E.2    Rots, N.Y.3    Berbers, G.4    Knol, M.J.5
  • 13
    • 33644792767 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement
    • Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA. 2006;295(10):1152-60.
    • (2006) JAMA , vol.295 , Issue.10 , pp. 1152-1160
    • Piaggio, G.1    Elbourne, D.R.2    Altman, D.G.3    Pocock, S.J.4    Evans, S.J.5
  • 14
    • 84871484789 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement
    • Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, Altman DG, CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA. 2012;308(24):2594-604.
    • (2012) JAMA , vol.308 , Issue.24 , pp. 2594-2604
    • Piaggio, G.1    Elbourne, D.R.2    Pocock, S.J.3    Evans, S.J.4    Altman, D.G.5
  • 15
    • 0037472909 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Design and analysis of non-inferiority mortality trials in oncology
    • Rothmann M, Li N, Chen G, Chi GY, Temple R, Tsou HH. Design and analysis of non-inferiority mortality trials in oncology. Stat Med. 2003;22(2):239-64.
    • (2003) Stat Med , vol.22 , Issue.2 , pp. 239-264
    • Rothmann, M.1    Li, N.2    Chen, G.3    Chi, G.Y.4    Temple, R.5    Tsou, H.H.6
  • 16
    • 80051673978 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Design and analysis of non-inferiority trials
    • Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC
    • Rothmann MD, Wiens BL, Chan IS. Design and analysis of non-inferiority trials. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2012.
    • (2012)
    • Rothmann, M.D.1    Wiens, B.L.2    Chan, I.S.3
  • 17
    • 33745931889 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Good enough: A primer on the analysis and interpretation of noninferiority trials
    • Kaul S, Diamond GA. Good enough: A primer on the analysis and interpretation of noninferiority trials. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(1):62-9.
    • (2006) Ann Intern Med , vol.145 , Issue.1 , pp. 62-69
    • Kaul, S.1    Diamond, G.A.2
  • 18
    • 38949211782 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preservation of effect and the regulatory approval of new treatments on the basis of non-inferiority trials
    • Snapinn S, Jiang Q. Preservation of effect and the regulatory approval of new treatments on the basis of non-inferiority trials. Stat Med. 2008;27(3):382-91. doi: 10.1002/sim.3073.
    • (2008) Stat Med , vol.27 , Issue.3 , pp. 382-391
    • Snapinn, S.1    Jiang, Q.2
  • 19
    • 77950189829 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
    • Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.
    • (2010) BMJ , vol.340 , pp. c332
    • Schulz, K.F.1    Altman, D.G.2    Moher, D.3
  • 20
    • 84952911909 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals
    • Accessed on 5 Nov 2015
    • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. ICMJE. 2015. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf. Accessed on 5 Nov 2015.
    • (2015) ICMJE.
  • 21
    • 85014588661 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • InCites™Journal Citation Reports ®
    • Web of Science. Accessed 11 Oct 2015
    • Thomson Reuters. InCites™Journal Citation Reports ®. Web of Science. 2015 https://jcr.incites.thomsonreuters.com/JCRJournalHomeAction.action. Accessed 11 Oct 2015.
    • (2015)
  • 22
    • 15244355307 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Choice of delta: requirements and reality--results of a systematic review
    • Lange S, Freitag G. Choice of delta: requirements and reality--results of a systematic review. Biom J. 2005;47(1):12-27. discussion 99-107.
    • (2005) Biom J , vol.47 , Issue.1 , pp. 12-27
    • Lange, S.1    Freitag, G.2
  • 23
    • 33749536902 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Methodological standards in non-inferiority AIDS trials: moving from adherence to compliance
    • Parienti JJ, Verdon R, Massari V. Methodological standards in non-inferiority AIDS trials: moving from adherence to compliance. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:46.
    • (2006) BMC Med Res Methodol , vol.6 , pp. 46
    • Parienti, J.J.1    Verdon, R.2    Massari, V.3
  • 24
    • 84873195412 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals
    • Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Weeks L, Peters J, Kober T, et al. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2.
    • (2012) Cochrane Database Syst Rev , vol.11 , pp. MR000030
    • Turner, L.1    Shamseer, L.2    Altman, D.G.3    Weeks, L.4    Peters, J.5    Kober, T.6
  • 25
    • 84883521808 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Regulatory scientific advice on non-inferiority drug trials
    • Wangge G, Putzeist M, Knol MJ, et al. Regulatory scientific advice on non-inferiority drug trials. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074818.
    • (2013) PLoS One , vol.8 , Issue.9
    • Wangge, G.1    Putzeist, M.2    Knol, M.J.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.