Transparency and accountability in science and politics: The awareness principle

Transparency and Accountability in Science and Politics: The Awareness Principle

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-257

  Andersson, Kjell ^a  

^a Karita Research   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014680142     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230227767     Document Type: Book

References (315)

1. F. Adlkofer, 'Lessons from the REFLEX study on biological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields', presentation at the RFID Workshop, 2 June 2006. http://www.rfidconsultation.eu/docs/ficheiros/Adlkofer.pdf. Copyright 2006 Franz Adlkofer
2. Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment: 'Advice on the implications of the farm-scale evaluations of genetically modified herbicidetolerant crops', 13 January 2004 http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/acre/advice/pdf/acre_advice 44.pdf
3. American Association of State Climatologists (AASC). 'Policy statement on climate variability and change', 2 April 2002.
4. J. Andersson, K. Andersson, and C.-O.Wene, 'The Swedish Dialogue Project: an attempt to explore how different actors may take part in the decision process related to disposal of radioactive waste', High Level Radioactive Waste Management, Fourth Annual International Conference, Las Vegas, 1993.
5. K. Andersson (ed.), 'Review/decide and inquiry/decide - two approaches to decision making', SKI Report 98:5, RISCOM Pilot Study, Stockholm, January 1998.
6. K. Andersson, R. Espejo, and C.-O. Wene, 'Building channels for transparent risk assessment', SKI Report 98:5, RISCOM pilot study, Stockholm 1998.
7. K. Andersson, B. Balfors, J. Schmidtbauer, and G. Sundqvist, 'Transparency and public participation in complex decision processes - prestudy for a decision research institute in Oskarshamn', KTH, TRITA-AMI Report 3068, 1999.
8. K. Andersson, 'Transparency and public participation - the need for a new Paradigm', VALDOR Symposium, pp. 57-67, Stockholm, June 2001.
9. K. Andersson, C.-O. Wene, B-M. Drottz Sjöberg, and M. Westerlind, 'Design and evaluation of public hearings for Swedish site selection', SKI Report 2003:32, (RISCOM II Deliverable 5.3).
10. K. Andersson, M.Westerlind et al. 'Transparency and public participation in radioactive waste management', RISCOM II Final report, SKI Report, August 2004.
11. K. Andersson, 'Overview of European initiatives: towards a framework to incorporate citizen values and social considerations in decision-making, background paper', Nuclear Waste Management Organization, Canada, January 2004.
12. K. Andersson, R. Espejo, and C.-O. Wene, 'What are the communication challenges for politicians, experts and stakeholders in order to enhance transparency in nuclear waste management decisions?', Report from Team Syntegrity Meeting. RISCOM II Deliverable 3.3. SKI Report 2004:25, Stockholm, 2004.
13. K. Andersson, B. Grundfelt, and C.-O. Wene, 'Transparent remediation projects', Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Contract E-48-04, Final Report, Stockholm, 2006.
14. K. Andersson, R. Johansson, and C.-O.Wene, 'Dialogos prestudy', (in Swedish), Elforsk Rapport 06.36, Stockholm, 2006.
15. K. Andersson, 'Making the decision-making basis for nuclear waste management transparent, summary of a pre-study report', KASAM Contract 38/06. Karita R: 07:01. ISBN 978-91-976858-0-1. In Swedish with an English summary, April 2007.
16. Y. Andersson-Sköld, J. Norrman, and K. Kockum, 'Survey of risk assessment methodologies for sustainable remediation', Proceedings of the fourth VALDOR Symposium (ed. Kjell Andersson), Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, ISBN 91-6318876-7, Stockholm, 14-18 May 2006.
17. S.R. Arnstein, 'A ladder of citizen participation'. American Institute of Planners Journal, 35(2): (1969) 216-24.
18. K. Asp, 'The voters reject the favourite issues of the media' (free translation), Dagens Nyheter, DN Debatt, 15 September 2002.
19. K. Asp, 'The alliance has been favoured by the media election coverage' (free translation), Dagens Nyheter, DN Debatt, 17 September 2006.
20. A. Bale, L'Attention, Presses Universitaires de France, 1970.
21. H. H. Bauer, 'Science in the 21st century: knowledge monopolies and research Cartels', Journal of Scientific Exploration 18, No. 4 (2004), 643-60.
22. S. Beer, Beyond Dispute - The Invention of Team Syntegrity (Chichester: JohnWiley 1994).
23. T. Beierle, 'Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions', Policy Studies Review 16(3/4) (1999), 75-103.
24. T. Beierle, and J. Cayford, 'Democracy in practice: public participation in environmental decisions', Resources for the Future, RFF Press book, Washington DC, 2002.
25. J.E. Bekelman, Y. Li, and C.P. Gross, 'Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review', Journal of the American Medical Association 289, 2003, 454-65.
26. Berkeley Lab. Synthetic Biology Department,synthbio Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Press Release, 2 April 2003. http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/media/pressreleases/03_04_02_newchair.html
27. Biotechnology and the European Public Concerted Action Group, 'Europe ambivalent on Biotechnology', Nature, 387, 26, June 1997.
28. Th. B. Birkland, 'Focusing events: mobilization, and agenda setting', Journal of Public Policy, 18 (1), 1998, 53-74.
29. D. Bok, Universities in the Marketplace - the Commercialization of Higher Education (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003).
30. T. Brante, and H. Norman, Epidemisk masspsykos eller reell risk? En sociologisk studie av kontroversen kring elöverkänslighet (Stockholm/Stehag: Brutus östlings Bokförlag Symposion, 1995).
31. S. Brint, In an Age of Experts - the Changing Roles of Professionals in Politics and Public Life (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1996).
32. R.H. Brown, Towards a Democratic Science (Yale University Press, 1998).
33. D. Bruce, and J. Tait, 'Interests, values and biotechnological risk', VALDOR Symposium, pp. 109-18, Stockholm, June 2003.
34. P. Bruckner, La mélancolie démocratique (Paris: Edition du Seuil, 1990).
35. C.R. Bråkenhielm, 'Safe disposal? review of the EIA Forum in Kalmar County, 1997-2000, from an ethical and democratic perspective', 2001 (in Swedish).
36. V. Bräuer, 'A new approach for siting a radioactive waste repository in Germany', International High Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference, Las Vegas, 30 March-2 April 2003, pp. 112-19.
37. J. Burton, Conflict: Resolution and Prevention (Basingstoke and London: Macmillan Press, 1990).
38. L. Busch, 'External review of the collaborative research agreement between Novartis Agricultural Discovery Institute, Inc. and The Regents of the University of California. Institute for Food and Agricultural Standards (IFAS)', Michigan State University, 13 July 2004.
39. C. Calhoun, 'Cognitive emotions?', in C. Calhoun, and R.C. Solomon (eds), What Is an Emotion: Classic Readings in Philosophical Psychology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).
40. T. Carlsson, K. Hallberg, K. Andersson, C.R. Bråkenhielm, and H. Åhagen, 'The Oskarshamn model for public involvement in the siting of nuclear facilities', VALDOR Symposium, Stockholm, June 2001.
41. D. Caruso, Intervention - Confronting the Real Risks of Genetic Engineering and Life on a Biotech Plane (San Francisco: Hybrid Vigor Press, 2006). CEC. EU White Paper on Governance, 2001.
42. Civil Society-Labor Coalition. 'An open letter to the International nanotechnology community at large - civil society-labor coalition rejects fundamentally flawed Dupont-Ed proposed framework', 12 April 2007 (submitted by 20 non-governmental organizations) http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/ 610/01/coalition_letter_april07.pdf
43. A. Clark, 'Artificial Intelligence and the many faces of reason', in Philosophy of Mind, (eds), S. Stich, and T.A. Warfield (Blackwell Publishing, 2003) pp. 309-21.
44. Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 1500). Title 40: Protection of Environment, Part 1502: Environmental Impact Statement. Sec. 1502.9 Draft, final, and supplemental statements.
45. J. Cohen, 'Deliberation and democratic legitimacy', in R.E. Goodin, and Ph. Pettit (eds), Contemporary Political Philosophy. (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002, first print 1997).
46. Committee on Radioactive Waste Management, UK, 'Managing our radioactive waste safely: CoRWM's recommendations to the Government'. CoRWM Doc 700. July 2006.
47. M. Considine, 'Quantifying risks in the oil and chemical industry', in Proceedings: Promotion of Technical Harmonisation on Risk-Based Decision-Making, 22-24 May 2000, Stresa/Italy.
48. Cordis Focus, No. 194, 8 April 2002, Published by the European Commission.
49. Cordis Focus, No. 200, 1 July 2002, Published by the European Commission.
50. Cordis Focus, No. 203, 12 August 2002, Published by the European Commission.
51. Cordis Focus, No. 211, 16 December 2002, Published by the European Commission.
52. Cordis Focus, No. 236, 12 January 2004, Published by the European Commission.
53. Cordis Focus, No. 237, 26 January 2004, Published by the European Commission.
54. Cordis Focus, No. 238, 9 February 2004, Published by the European Commission.
55. Cordis Focus, No. 247, 14 June 2004, Published by the European Commission.
56. Cordis Focus, No. 249, 12 July 2004, Published by the European Commission.
57. COWAM. The COWAM European Concerted Action, www.cowam.com , June 2003.
58. R. Dahl, A Preface to Democratic Theory (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1956).
59. R. Dahl, 'Hierarchy, democracy, and bargaining in politics and economics', in H. Euleau (ed.), Political Behaviour, Glencoe (Ill): the Free Press, 1956.
60. R. Dahl, Democracy and Its Critics (Yale University Press, 1989).
61. R. Dahrendorf (Member of House of Lords), Dagens Nyheter, Stockholm, 23 August 2002.
62. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK, 'Response to the Report and Recommendations from the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM)', by the UK Government and the devolved Administrations. London 2006.
63. R. De Sousa, The Rationality of Emotions (Cambridge: MA: MIT Press, 1987).
64. D. Dickson, The New Politics of Science (New York: Pantheon Books, 1984).
65. M. Douglas, and A.Wildavsky, Risk and Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982).
66. A. Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1957)
67. B.-M. Drottz-Sjöberg, 'Evaluation of hearings with questionnaires and Interviews', SKI Rapport 01:39. In Swedish with a 2-page English summary (RISCOM II Deliverable 5.4), 2001.
68. B-M. Drottz-Sjöberg, 'Current trends in risk communication - theory and Practice', Directorate for Civil Defence and Emergency Planning, Norway, 2003a. Also available at http://www.dsb.no/
69. B.-M. Drottz-Sjöberg, 'Focusing on SSI's risk and radiation protection Criteria: a report based on discussions in focus groups in östhammar and öskarshamn municipalities', SSI rapport: 2003:20b, 2003b.
70. J. Dryzek, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond (Oxford University Press, 2000).
71. Economic and Social Research Council (UK). 'Global environmental change programme: the politics of GM food: risk science and public trust', Special Briefing No. 5, October 1999.
72. Environmental Assessment Panel, 'Report of the Nuclear FuelWaste Management and Disposal Concept Assessment Panel, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency', Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Canada 1998.
73. Environmental Defense-DuPont Nano Partnership, Nano Risk Framework, Environmental Defense (Washington, DC) and DuPont, (Wilmington), 21 June 2007. http://www.environmentaldefense.org
74. Environmental Protection Agency, '40 CFR Part 197: Public Health and Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Yucca Mountain, Nevada: Proposed Rule', Federal Register, v.70, No.161, 22 August 2005, pp. 49014-49065.
75. R. Espejo, 'Structure for transparency in nuclear waste management: 'comparative review of the structures for nuclear waste management in France, Sweden and the UK', SKI Report, 2003: 26. ETC Group web site http://www.etcgroup.org/en
76. Eurobarometer 55.2, 'Science, citizens and technology', December 2001.
77. Eurobarometer 56.2, 'Europeans and radioactive waste', April 2002.
78. Eurobarometer 64.3, 'Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: patterns and trends'.
79. European Commission, Research Directorate - 'General Science and Society Action Plan', European Research Area, Brussels. ISBN 92-894-3025-7.
80. European Commission, 'Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle,' Brussels, 2 February 2000, COM(2000).
81. European Commission: Vision 2002, 'Nanoelectronics at the centre of change: a farsighted strategy for Europe Report of the High Level Group,' June 2004 EUR 21149.
82. European Commission. 'Life sciences and biotechnology - A strategy for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions,' COM(2002)27 of 23 January 2002.
83. European Commission COM (2003) 334. 'Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Application and Effectiveness of the EIA Directive (Directive 85/337/EEC as amended by Directive 97/11/EC) - How Successful Are the Member States in implementing the EIA Directive?'.
84. European Commission. Regulation (EC). No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed.
85. European Commission. Regulation (EC). No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms.
86. European Commission, Press release, 20 December 2004, http://europa.eu.int European Commission: Special Eurobarometer 227 - Radioactive Waste 2005.
87. European Commission, MEMO 06/61, Brussels, 7 February 2006.
88. European Commission. Special Eurobarometer. Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and trends. Final report on Eurobarometer 64.3. July 2006.
89. European Commission. Standard Eurobarometer 64. Public opinion in the European Union, June 2006.
90. European Commission - Commission Staff Working Document. Document accompanying the mid-term review of the Strategy on Life Sciences and Biotechnology COM(2007) 175.
91. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the mid term review of the Strategy on Life Sciences and Biotechnology. SEC(2007) 441.
92. European Food Safety Authority, web site: http://www.efsa.europa.eu
93. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission. Opinion on the ethical aspects of nanomedicine - Opinion No. 21. 17 January 2007.
94. European Parliament. Science and Technological Options Assessment (STOA). Web site: http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa
95. European Union.World energy, technology and climate policy outlook 2030, EUR-OP, Luxembourg, 2003.
96. European Union. Directive 85/337/EEC as amended by Directive 97/11/EC.
97. European Union. Directive 2001/42/EC of The European Parliament and of The Council.
98. G. Falkemark, Politik, Lobbyism och Manipulation (Nya Doxa, 1999). Federal Register. 66 FR 55732. Disposal of High-Level RadioactiveWastes in a Proposed Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Final Rule 10 CFR Part 63.
99. Th. Field, 'Pursuing transparency through science courts', VALDOR Symposium Stockholm, June 1999.
100. D. Fiorino, 'Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms', Science, Technology, and Human Values 15(2) (1990) 226-44.
101. B. Fischhoff, P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, and B. Combs, 'How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits', Policy Sciences, 9 (1978) 127-52.
102. B. Fischhoff, S. Lichtenstein, P. Slovic, P. S.L. Derby, and R.L. Keeney, Acceptable Risk, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981).
103. B. Fischhoff, 'Risk: a guide to controversy', Appendix to National Research Council Improving Risk Communications (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989) pp. 211-319.
104. P. A. Fleming, Examining Recent Expert Elicitation Judgment Guidelines: Value Assumptions and the Prospects for Rationality, Proceedings of the first VALDOR Symposium (ed. Kjell Andersson), pp. 243-54, Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm, 13-17 June 1999.
105. F. Foltz, 'Five arguments for increasing public participation in making science policy', Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, Vol. 19, No. 2 (1999) 117-27.
106. N. Fraser, 'Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy', in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992).
107. G. Gaskell, N. Allum, W. Wagner, T. Nielsen, E. Jelsoe, and M. Kohring, 'In the public eye: representations of biotechnology in Europe', in G. Gaskell, and M. Bauer (eds),Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy (London: Science Museum Press, 2001) pp. 53-79.
108. A. Gnaiger, and E. Martin, Science Shops: Operational Options SCIPAS report no. 1 Study financed by the EC-DG XII programme 'Improving the Human Research Potential and the Socio-Economic Knowledge Base(IHP)' and 'Strategic Analysis of Specific Political Issues' (STRATA), HPV1-CT-1999-00001, July 2001.
109. Government of Canada, An Act Respecting the Long-term Management of Nuclear Fuel Waste, 49-50-51 Elizabeth II, 2001-2002, First session, 37th Parliament, Royal Assent 13 June, in force 15 November: House of Commons of Canada, Ottawa 2002.
110. Government Office for the NorthWest, Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Appeal by UK Nirex Limited, Proposed Rock Characterisation Facility on land at and adjoining Longlands Farm, Gosforth, Cumbria (LPA Ref. 4/94/9071): Decision letter on behalf of the Secretary of State for the Environment, with Inspectors and Assessors Reports, 17 March 1997.
111. P. E. Griffiths, 'Emotions', in S. Stich, and T. A. Warfield (eds), Philosophy of Mind, (Blackwell Publishing, 2003) pp. 288-308.
112. C. Grimes, 'Whither the civic journalism bandwagon?', Discussion Paper, The Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy. John F. Kennedy School of Government, February 1999.
113. J. Habermas, Toward a Rational Society (London: Heineman, 1971). (Transl. of German original: Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1968).
114. J. Habermas, Communication and the Evolution of Society (Boston: Beacon Press, 1979). (Transl. of German original: Zur Rekonstruktionen des historischen Materialismus (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1979).
115. J. Habermas, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 vols (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1981). (Transl. by Th. McCarthy as The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols, (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987).
116. J. Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into the of Bourgeois Public Society (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989). (Transl. by Th. Burger of the German original Strukturwandel der öffentlichkeit (Herman Luchterhand Verlag,1962).
117. J. Habermas, Faktizät und Geltung (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp) Transl. by W. Rehg, Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).
118. B. Hedberg, 'Transparency forum for mobile telephone systems - a risk management project', Proceedings of the fourth VALDOR (VALues in Decisions On Risk) Symposium (ed. Kjell Andersson), Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm, 14-18 May 2006.
119. D. Held, Models of Democracy, 2nd edn (Oxford: Polity Press, 2002).
120. D. Henderson, 'Governments and climate change issues: the case for rethinking',World Economics, Vol. 8, No. 2, (2007).
121. R. Henderson, A.B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg, 'Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university Patenting, 1965-1988', The Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1) (1998)119-27.
122. Her Majesty's Stationery Office. The Forward Look of Government-funded Science, Engineering and Technology, CM3257, 1-2 May1996.
123. Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration, London, 2003.
124. Her Majesty's Treasury. Managing Risks to the Public: Appraisal Guidance. London, June 2005.
125. Her Majesty's Treasury. Science and Innovation Investment Framework 2004-2014: Next Steps, March 2006.
126. M. Hildén, and P. Jalonen, 'Key issues in strategic environmental impact assessments - finnish experiences', In Hilding-Rydevik (ed.), Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programs: Nordic Experiences in Relation to the Implementation of the EU Directive 2001/42/EC (Stockholm: Nordregio, 2003), ISBN 91-89332-34-2.
127. T. Hilding-Rydevik (ed.), Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programs, Nordic Experiences in Relation to the Implementation of the EU Directive 2001/42/EC (Stockholm: Nordregio, 2003), ISBN 91-89332-34-2. House of Lords: Science and Society. 3rd Report of the Select Committee on Science and Technology, 2000, HL 38.
128. J. Hunt, K. Day, and R. Kemp, Stakeholder Dialogue: Experience and Analysis, RISCOM II Deliverable 4.1, Lancaster University, Galson Sciences, Environment Agency and NIREX, August 2001.
129. Imperial College London response to the Lambert Review, 4 December 2003, http://www.imperial.ac.uk/P4778.htm
130. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), (2007), 'Summary for policymakers, Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor, and H.L. Miller (eds), (in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY.
131. International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA), 'Principles of environmental impact assessment best practice', http://www.iaia. org/Non_Members/Pubs_Ref_ Material/pubs_ref_material_index.htm
132. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) 'Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)', Health Physics, 74(4) (1998) 494-522.
133. ICRP, International Commission on Radiological Protection (Presented by Professor Roger Clarke, ICRP Chairman). 'The evolution of the system of radiological protection: the justification for new ICRP recommendations', Journal of Radiological Protection 23 (2003)129-42.
134. ICRP, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 'The optimisation of radiological protection - broadening the process - Report by the ICRP Committee 4
135. Task Group on Optimisation of Protection', updated draft after public consultation, January 2006 http://www.icrp.org/
136. International Energy Agency, Energy Technology and Climate Change - A Call to Action, (Paris: OECD/IEA, 2000).
137. International Energy Agency, The World Energy Outlook (Paris, 2006).
138. A. Irwin, Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. (London & New York: Routledge, 1995).
139. A. Irwin, and B. Wynne (eds), Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
140. W. Jackson, 'Save Democracy from Civic Journalism: North Carolina's odd Experiment', Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2(3) (1997), 102-17.
141. P. James, F. Kemper, and G. Pascal, A European Food and Public Health Authority. The Future of Scientific Advice in the EU, EFPHA & FSA-8-12-99, for Commission, 1999 http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/future_food_en.pdf
142. S. Jasanoff, The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policy Maker (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).
143. S. Jasanoff, Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995).
144. B. Jones, Politics and the Architecture of Choice (University of Chicago Press, 2001).
145. S. Joss, 'Toward the public sphere - reflections on the development of participatory technology assessment', Bulletin of Science and Technology, Special Issue: Democratising Technology, Vol. 22, No. 3, (Sage Publications, 2002), pp. 179-89.
146. I. Kant, 'What is Enlightenment?', in the Berlinischer Monatscrift, a Berlin monthly directed to the general public. 1784.
147. A. Kantrowitz, Testimony. Before the Government Research and Technical Programs Subcomm. of the House Comm. on Government operations , 90th Cong. 1st Sess (16 March 1967).
148. Karolinska Institutet. Annual Report 2004.
149. KASAMs Review of the SKBs R&DD Programme 95, p. 22, KASAM, Stockholm 1996.
150. D. Kellner, 'Habermas, the public sphere, and democracy: a critical intervention', web site: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/papers/habermas (10 July 2006).
151. M. Kenney, Biotechnology: The University Industrial Complex (Yale University Press, 1988).
152. M. Kenney, 'Biotechnology and the creation of a new economic space', Private Science: Biotechnology and the Rise of the Molecular Sciences, (Scholarly Book Services Inc, 2002).
153. M. L. Khandekar, Letter, The Hill Times, Canada's Politics and Government Newsweekly 13 August 2007.
154. I. Klimanskaya, Y. Chung, S. Becker, S.-J. Lu, and R. Lanza, 'Human embryonic stem cell lines derived from single blastomeres', Nature, 23 August 2006; [Epub ahead of print], PMID: 16929302.
155. L. Klüver, 'consensus conferences at the Danish Board of Technology', pp. 41-9 in S. Joss, and J. Durant, J. (eds), Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. Science Museum with the support of the European Commission Directorate General XII (c). 1995.
156. L. Klüver et al., 'EUROPTA: European Participatory Technology Assessment - Participatory Methods in Technology Assessment and Technology Decision-Making', The Danish Board of Technology, Copenhagen, 2000.
157. I. Kozine, H. Duijm, and K. Lauridsen, 'Safety and risk analysis activities in other areas than the nuclear industry', Risø National Laboratory Rapport NSK-21, 2000, ISBN: 87-7893-071-5.
158. S. Krimsky, 'Biotechnics and society - the rise of industrial genetics' (Praeger Publishing Company, 1991: Currently under Greenwood Publishing Group).
159. S. Krimsky, Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? (Rowman-Littlefield Publishing, 2003).
160. R.A. Krueger, and M.A. Casey, Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 3rd edn (SAGE Publications, 2000).
161. Th. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn, enlarged (The University of Chicago Press, 1962).
162. F. Laird, 'Participatory analysis, democracy and technological decision making', Science, Technology & Human Values, 18, (1993) 341-61.
163. F. Laird, 'Institutional Learning and Development - the Case of Renewable Energy', Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, 2-5 September 1999. Copyright by the American Political Science Association, web site: http://www.du.edu/~flaird/
164. P. Lerman, 'Impact assessment in Swedish planning', in Hilding-Rydevik (ed.), Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programs, Nordic Experiences in Relation to the Implementation of the EU Directive 2001/42/EC (Stockholm: Nordregio, 2003), ISBN 91-89332-34-2.
165. A. Leskinen, and M. Turtiainen, 'Interactive planning in the EIA of the Final Disposal Facility for Spent Nuclear Fuel in Finland', Diskurssi Oy, Helsinki, 2002, (RISCOM II Deliverable 4.8).
166. L. Lewin, and O. Petersson, 'The voters are left in the lurch'(free translation), Dagens Nyheter, DN Debatt, 18 September 2002.
167. H. Longino, Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry (Princeton University Press, 1990).
168. S. Lovelady 'Once There Were Giants', Columbia Journalism Review, 18 May 2006 http://www.cjr.org/
169. C.B. Macpherson, The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).
170. C. Marris, B. Wynne, P. Simmons, and S. Weldon, 'Public perceptions of agricultural biotechnologies in Europe', Final Report of the PABE research project, Contract number: FAIR CT98-3844 (DG12-SSMI), December 2001.
171. G. Majone, Evidence, Argument, & Persuasion in the Policy Process (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1989).
172. M.G. Malsch, Nevada, NRC and 'Yucca Mountain16th Annual Regulatory Information Conference', 11 March 2004.
173. P.J. May, 'Reconsidering policy design: Policies and publics', Journal of Public Policy, 11 (2) (1990) .
174. L.H. Mayhew, The New Public (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
175. A. Mazur, 'Science Courts', Minerva 15 (1977), 1-14.
176. R. P. Merges, 'Property rights theory and the commons: the case of scientific research', in P.E. Frankel, F.D. Miller, Jr and J. Paul (eds), Scientific Innovation, Philosophy, and Public Policy (Cambridge University Press, 1996).
177. R. Merton, 'The normative structure of science', in R. Merton, R. (ed.), The Sociology of Science, Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1973) (original article in 1942).
178. Th. Meyer, Media Democracy - How the Media Colonize Politics (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004, first published in 2002).
179. J. S. Mill, 'On Liberty', 1859, in M. Cohen (ed.), The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill (New York: Modern Library, 1961).
180. J.S. Mill, 'Considerations of Representative Government', 1861. In H.B. Acton (ed.), Utilitarianism, Liberty and Representative Government (London: Dent, 1972).
181. M. Milligan, and J. Rowley, 'What the mobile industry is doing in response to RF concerns', Proceedings, VALDOR Symposium, Stockholm, May 2006, pp. 387-94.
182. N. Myers, 'The precautionary principle puts values first', Bulletin of Science and Technology, Special Issue: Democratising Technology, Vol. 22, No. 3, Sage Publications (2002) 210-19.
183. G. Myrdal, The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory (London: Routledge, 1953), 1st edn 1929.
184. National Academy of Sciences. 'Technical Bases for Yucca Mountain Standards', August 1995.
185. National Academy of Sciences. Animal Biotechnology: Science Based Concerns, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources (BANR), Board on Life Sciences (BLS) (The National Academies Press. 2002).
186. National Environmental Policy Act, 1969.
187. National Research Council, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1983).
188. National Research Council, Improving Risk Communication, Committee on Risk Perception and Communication (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989).
189. National Research Council, Understanding Risk. Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996).
190. National Science Foundation, 'Grant proposal guide' (GPG), NSF 04-23, Arlington, 2004.
191. National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) web site http://www.nano.gov/
192. Nirex, 'The way forward', Discussion document, UK Nirex Ltd, 1987.
193. Nirex. Transparency Policy, UK Nirex Ltd, http://www.nirex.co.uk, April 2003.
194. H. Nissenbaum, 'Protecting privacy in an information age. 'the problem of privacy in public', Law and Philosophy, 17 (1998) 559-96.
195. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The reactor safety study: an assessment of accidental risks on US commercial nuclear power plants (NUREG-74/104, WASH 1400). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1975.
196. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 'Severe accident risks: an assessment for Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants', NUREG-1150, (Vol. 1) December 1990, (Vol. 2) December 1990, (Vol. 3) January 1991.
197. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 'Use of probabilistic risk assessment methods in nuclear activities: final policy statement', Federal Register, Vol. 60, p. 42622 (60 FR 42622), 16 August 1995.
198. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), 'Risk-informed regulation implementation plan', September 2003.
199. Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO). 'Approach to development of analytical framework', Ontario, July 2003.
200. Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO). 'Choosing a way forward: the future management of Canada's used nuclear fuel (Final Study)', Toronto, November 2005.
201. Nuclear Waste Policy Act, 1982. 42 U.S.C. 10101-10133. (1988).
202. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Press Release, 6 April 2004.
203. OECD, 'Public information, consultation and involvement in radioactive waste Management: an international overview of approaches and experiences', OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, 2003.
204. OECD/Nuclear Energy Agency, Forum on Stakeholder Confidence (FSC), 'Strategic directions of the RWMC forum on stakeholder confidence', EA/RWM/FSC (2001)2/ REV2, Paris , 2001.
205. OECD/PUMA, 'Citizens as partners: information, consultation and public participation in policy-making', Paris, 2001.
206. C. Oguamanam, 'Tension on the farm fields: the death of traditional agriculture?', Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, Vol. 27, No. 4 (2007) 260-73.
207. N. Oreskes, 'The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change', Science, Vol. 306 (2004), p. 1686.
208. W. Outhwaite (ed.), The Habermas Reader (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).
209. J. Owen-Smith, and W.W. Powell, 'Standing on shifting terrain: faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences', Science Studies, 1(2002), 3-28.
210. C. Pateman, Participation and Democratic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970).
211. L. Pilarski, M. Mehta, T. Caulfield, K. Kaler, and C. Backhouse, 'Microsystems and nanoscience for biomedical applications: a view to the future', Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol. 24, No. 1 (2004) 40-5.
212. S. Pollard, R. Yearsley, R. Kemp, and M. Crawford, 'Strategic risk assessment: a decision tool for complex decisions, Proceedings, VALDOR Symposium, Stockholm, June 2001.
213. I.F. Pryme, and R. Lembcke, 'In vivo studies on possible health consequences of genetically modified food and feed - with particular regard to ingredients consisting of genetically modified plant materials', Nutrition and Health, Vol. 17, (2003) 1-8.
214. Pulizer, J., The North American Review (May 1904).
215. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971).
216. REFLEX, 'Risk evaluation of potential environmental hazards from low energy electromagnetic field exposure using sensitive in vitro methods.' European Commission Contract: QLK4-CT-1999-01574. End date: 31 May, 2004.
217. O. Renn, Th. Webler, and P. Wiedermann, Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation (Klüwer Academic Publishers, 1995).
218. O. Renn, 'A model for an analytic-deliberative process in risk management', Environmental Science and Technology, 33, No. 18 (1999), 3049-55.
219. O. Renn, 'Participatory processes for resolving conflicts about risk. In 'Public Participation in Risk Management'; Report from a Session at the EuroScience Open Forum in Stockholm, Stockholm 2004, Swedish Radiation Protection Authority. SSI Draft Report.
220. O. Renn, and Th. Webler, 'Der kooperative Diskurs - Theoretische Grundlagen, Anforderungen, Möglichkeiten', in: O. Renn, H. Kastenholz, P. Schild, and U. Wilhelm (eds), Abfallpolitik im kooperativen Diskurs. Bürgerbeteiligung bei der Standortsuche für eine Deponie im Kanton Aargau (Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, 1998), pp. 3-103.
221. O. Renn, Th. Webler, H. Rakel, P.C. Dienel, and B. Johnson, 'Public Participation in Decision Making: a Three-Step-Procedure', Policy Sciences, 26 (1993), 189-214.
222. M. Repacholi, 'An overview of WHO's EMF project and the health effects of EMF Exposure', Proceedings of the International Conference on Non-Ionizing Radiation at UNITEN (ICNIR 2003). Electromagnetic Fields and Our Health, 20-22 October 2003.
223. D. Rigby, 'GM food, risk, regulation and the EU-US trade dispute', The University of Manchester, School of Economic Studies. Discussion Paper Series, No. 0410, August 2004.
224. M. C. Roco, 'The US national nanotechnology initiative after 3 years (2001-2003)', Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6 (2004) 1-10.
225. J. Rosen, What Are Journalists For? (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999).
226. J.-J. Rousseau, Du Contrat Social (Amsterdam, 1762).
227. G. Rowe, and L.J. Frewer, 'Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation', Science, Technology and Human Values, 25 (2000) 3-29.
228. G. Rowe, and L.J. Frewer, 'Evaluating public participation exercises: a research agenda', Science, Technology, and Human Values 29 (2004) 512-56.
229. G. Rowe, and G. Wright, 'Differences in expert and lay judgements of risk: myth or Reality?', Risk Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 2 (2001) 341-356.
230. The Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. (London, 2004).
231. The Royal Society. Policy Document 09/04, 2004.
232. Royal Society News Stories. 'Government commits to regulating nanotechnologies but will it deliver?', Royal Society web site, 25 February 2005. http://www.royalsoc.ac. uk/news.asp?id=2976
233. L.G. Salford, E. Brun, J.L. Eberhardt, L. Malmgren, and B.R.R. Persson, 'Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phone', Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 111, No. 7 (2003).
234. P. Sandman, 'Because people are concerned - How should public outrage affect application of the precautionary principle?', Peter Sandman web site: http://www.psandman.com/, July 2004 .
235. P. Sandoe, 'The ethical framework for risk assessment - the case of genetically modified crops', Proceedings of the second VALDOR Symposium (ed. Kjell Andersson), pp. 200-7, Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm, 10-14 June 2001.
236. S.L. Santos, and C. Chess, 'Evaluating citizen advisory boards: the importance of theory and participant based criteria and practical implications', Risk Analysis, Vol. 23, No. 3, Blackwell Publishing (2003).
237. J. Schaffer, 'The role of newspapers in building citizenship, Keynote Remarks', 5th Brazilian Newspaper Congress, São Paulo, Brazil, 13 September 2004.
238. R. von Schomberg, 'The normative dimensions of the precautionary principle and its relation to science and risk management decisions', Th. Achen (ed.), Microscopic Modification and Big Politics', Linkoeping Studies in Arts and Science, Vadstena, Sweden, 2004.
239. M. Schudson, 'Was there ever a public sphere?: if so, when?: reflections on the American case', in C. Calhoun, (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, (Cambridge, MIT Press. 1992) pp. 143-63.
240. J. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (London: Allen and Unwin, 1987).
241. S.H. Schwartz, 'Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and Empirical tests in 20 countries', in M. P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25 (Orlando: Academic Press, 1992) 1-65.
242. S.H. Schwartz, 'Beyond individualism/collectivism: new dimensions of values', in U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, and G.Yoon (eds), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications.(Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994).
243. R. Sclove, Democracy and Technology (New York: The Guilford Press, 1995).
244. R. Sclove, 'STS on Other Planets', EASST Review 15 (2) (1996)12-16.
245. A. Sen, 'Accounts, actions and values: objectivity of social science', in C. Lloyd (ed.), Social Theory and Political Practice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983) 87-107.
246. S. Shackley, C. McLachlan, and C. Gough, 'The public perceptions of carbon capture and storage. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research', Working Paper 44, January 2004.
247. Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal. 'Advanced cell technology raises money after stem cell news', 25 August 2006.
248. H. Simon, 'A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice', Quart. J. Econ. 64, (1955) 99-118.
249. H. Simon, Administrative Behaviour. 2nd edn. (New York: Macmillan, (1961[1947]).
250. H. Simon, 'Theories of Bounded Rationality', in C. McGuire, and R. Radner, (eds), Decision and Organization (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1972).
251. L. Sjöberg, 'The psychometric paradigm revisited', paper presented at the Annual. Meeting, Royal Statistical Society, University of Warwick, UK, 1999.
252. L. Sjöberg, 'Perceived risk and tampering with nature'. Journal of Risk Research, 3 (2000a) 353-67.
253. L. Sjöberg, 'The different dynamics of personal and general risk'. In M.P. Cottam, D.W. Harvey, R.P. Pape, and J. Tait (eds), Foresight and Precaution, Vol. 2 (Balkema, Rotterdam/Brookfield, 2000b).
254. L. Sjöberg, J. Truedsson, L. Frewer, and A. Prades, 'Through a glass darkly: experts' and the public's mutual risk perception', in M.P. Cottam, D.W. Harvey, R.P. Pape and J. Tait (eds), Foresight and Precaution, Vol. 1 (Balkema, Rotterdam/Brookfield, 2000).
255. L. Sjöberg, 'Are received risk perception models alive and well?', Risk Analysis, 22, (2002a) 665-70.
256. L. Sjöberg, 'Attitudes to technology and risk: going beyond what is immediately given', Policy Sciences, 35, (2002b). 379-400.
257. SKB, 'Swedish nuclear fuel and waste management Co, SR 97 - post-closure safety', Main Report. SKB Technical Report, TR-99-06, Stockholm, 1999.
258. SKB R&DD Programme 95, 'Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, 1995.
259. P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein, 'Behavioral decision theory', Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 28 (1977)1-39.
260. P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein, 'Rating the risks', Environment, 21(4) (1979) 14-20, 36-9.
261. P. Slovic, 'Trust, emotion, sex, politics and science', in M.H. Bazerman, D.M. Messick, A.E. Tenbrunsel, and K.A. Wade-Benzoni (eds), Environment, Ethics and Behaviour, (San Francisco: Lexington Press, 1997), pp. 277-313.
262. P. Slovic, 'Cigarette smokers: rational actors or rational fools?', In P. Slovic (ed.), Smoking: Risk, Perception and Policy (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001) pp. 97-124.
263. G. Stigler, 'The Economics of Information', Journal of Political Economy (1961).
264. S. Stirling, and S. Mayer, 'Re-thinking risk. a pilot multi-criteria mapping of a genetically modified crop in agricultural systems in the UK', SPRU, University of Sussex, 1999.
265. J. Street, Mass Media, Politics and Democracy (New York: Palgrave, 2001).
266. G. Sundqvist, The Bedrock of Opinion, Science - Technology and Society in the Siting of High-Level Nuclear Waste (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002).
267. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. 'Quality manual for the use of grants for restoration of contaminated sites', In Swedish. Efterbehandling av förorenade områden. Kvalitetsmanual för användning och hantering av bidrag till efterbehandling och sanering. Manual efterbehandling. Utgåva 1. Best no. 1234-7. Statens Naturvårdsverk, Stockholm, 2003.
268. Swedish Radiation Protection Authority. 'The Swedish Radiation Protection Authority's regulations on the protection of human health and the environment in connection with the final management of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste, 28 September 1998.
269. The Science Court Experiment, 'An Interim Report. Task Force of the Presidential Advisory Group on Anticipated Advances in Science and Technology', Science 193 (20 August 1976), 653-656.
270. A. Mazur, 'Science Courts', Minerva 15 (1977), 1-14.
271. J. Tickner, and L. Ketelsen, 'Democracy and the precautionary principle', Science and Environmental Health Network, Newsletter, Vol. 6, No. 3 (May 2001). www.sehn.org
272. G. Tunhammar, A. Dreber, and M. Hulth, 'A majority wants the euro within four years', Dagens Nyheter (29 July 2002, in Swedish).
273. UK Government. Response to The Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering Report: 'Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties', HM Government in consultation with the devolved administrations. February 2005.
274. UK House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. 5th Report of Session 2003-2004 on Radioactive Waste Management, December 2004.
275. United Nations Economic Commission For Europe. Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context. Espoo, Finland, 25 February 1991. United Nations. Report of The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3-14 June 1992. Annex I: Rio Declaration on Environment and Development A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I).
276. United Nations Economic Commission For Europe. Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. Aarhus, Denmark, 25 June 1998.
277. United Nations Economic Commission For Europe. The Aarhus Convention: An Implementation Guide, New York and Geneva, 2000.
278. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, web site http://www.unece.org/
279. University of Oxford, Lambert Review of Business - University Collaboration - Consultation Response from the University of Oxford, http://www.lambertreview. org.uk/
280. B. Vanderburg, 'Johannesburg, Kyoto and the Need for Knowledge Infrastructure and Renewal', Editorial in Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol. 2, No. 6 ( 2002).
281. C. Vergez, Evaluating Public Participation Exercises - PUMA Findings, NEA/RWM/FSC (2003)10.
282. C. Vlek, 'A multi-level, multi-stage and multi-attribute perspective on risk assessment, decision-making and risk control', Risk Decision and Policy, 1(1) (1996) 9-31.
283. J. Washburn, University, Inc.: the Corporate Corruption of Higher Education (Basic Books, 2005).
284. J. Washburn, 'The Best Minds Money Can Buy', Los Angeles Times (21 July 2006).
285. M. Weber, Economy and Society (eds), G. Roth, and C. Wittich (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).
286. Th. Webler, and S. Tuler, 'Unlocking the puzzle of public participation', Bulletin of Science and Technology, Special Issue: Democratising Technology, Vol. 22, No. 3, Sage Publications, (2002) 179-89.
287. A. Weinberg, 'Science and Trans-Science', Minerva 10 (1972).
288. C.-O. Wene, and R. Espejo, 'A meaning for transparency in decision processes,' Proceedings of the first VALDOR Symposium (ed. Kjell Andersson), pp. 404-21, Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm, 13-17 June 1999. E. Winblad, talk at SKB Dagen, 21 April 2005.
289. World Health Organization, 'Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile telephones and their base stations,' Fact sheet No. 193, http://www.who.int/ mediacentre// Revised June 2000
290. World Health Organization, 'Establishing a dialogue on risks from electromagnetic fields', 2002.
291. World Health Organization, 'Precautionary framework for public health protection', draft for review (2 May 2003), http://www.who.int/peh-emf/meetings/Lux_PP_Feb 2003/en/
292. J. Ziman, 'Non-instrumental roles of science', Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 9 (2003)17-27.
293. D. Zolo, Democracy and Complexity: A Realistic Approach (Polity Press, 1992).
294. H. Åhagen, T. Carlsson, K. Hallberg, and K. Andersson, 'The Oskarshamn model for public involvement in the siting of nuclear facilities', VALDOR Symposium, Stockholm, June 1999.
295. D. Book, Universities in The Marketplace - the Commercialization of Higher Education (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003).
296. S. Brint, In an Age of Experts - the Changing Roles of Professionals in Politics and Public Life (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1996).
297. R.H. Brown, Towards a Democratic Science (Yale University Press, 1998).
298. R. Dahl, Democracy and Its Critics (Yale University Press, 1989).
299. J. Dryzek, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond (Oxford University Press, 2000).
300. Habermas, J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into the of Bourgeois Public Society (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989). (Translated by Th. Burger of the German original Strukturwandel der öffentlichkeit (Herman Luchterhand Verlag, 1962).
301. D. Held, Models of Democracy, 2nd edn (Oxford: Polity Press, 2002).
302. M. Kenney, Biotechnology: The University Industrial Complex (Yale University Press, 1988).
303. S. Krimsky, 'Biotechnics and Society - the Rise of Industrial Genetics' (Praeger Publishing Company, 1991. Currently under Greenwood Publishing Group).
304. S. Krimsky, Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? (Rowman-Littlefield Publishing Co., 2003).
305. G. Majone, Evidence, Argument, & Persuasion in the Policy Process (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1989).
306. L.H. Mayhew, The New Public (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
307. Th. Meyer, Media Democracy - How the Media Colonize Politics (Cambridge Polity Press, 2004, first published in 2002).
308. W. Outhwaite (ed.), The Habermas Reader (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).
309. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971).
310. G. Rowe and L.J. Frewer, 'Evaluating public participation exercises: a research agenda', Science, Technology, and Human Values 29 (2004) 512-56.
311. J. Street, Mass Media, Politics and Democracy (New York: Palgrave, 2001).
312. J. Washburn, University, Inc.: The Corporate Corruption of Higher Education (Basic Books, 2005).
313. J. Washburn, 'The Best Minds Money Can Buy', Los Angeles Times (21 July 2006).
314. A. Weinberg, 'Science and Trans-Science', Minerva 10 (1972).
315. D. Zolo, Democracy and Complexity, A Realistic Approach (Polity Press, 1992).