Age group differences in performance using diverse input modalities: Insertion task evaluation

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages

  Carvalho, Diana ^a,d   Bessa, Maximino ^a,d   Magalhães, Luís ^b   Carrapatoso, Eurico ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS OS MONTES AND ALTO DOURO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^d NONE   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Gestures; Human computer interaction; Input modalities; Insertion task; Interaction paradigms; Keyboard; Mouse; Natural user interfaces; Tangibles; Touch

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; MAMMALS; USER INTERFACES;

GESTURES; INPUT MODALITIES; INSERTION TASK; INTERACTION PARADIGM; KEYBOARD; MOUSE; NATURAL USER INTERFACES; TANGIBLES; TOUCH;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 85014619133     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2998626.2998664     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Accot, J. and Zhai, S. 1999. Performance evaluation of input devices in trajectory-based tasks. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems the CHI is the limit - CHI '99 (New York, New York, USA, May 1999), 466-472.
2. Beyer, H. 1981. Tukey, John W.: Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Reading, Mass. - Menlo Park, Cal., London, Amsterdam, Don Mills, Ontario, Sydney 1977, XVI, 688 S. Biometrical Journal. 23, 4 (1981), 413-414.
3. Blake, J. 2011. Natural User Interfaces in .NET. Manning Publications Co.
4. Blake, J. 2012. The natural user interface revolution. Natural User Interfaces in .NET. Manning Publications Co. 1-43.
5. Bobeth, J. et al. 2014. Tablet, gestures, remote control? Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international conference on Interactive experiences for TV and online video - TVX '14 (New York, New York, USA, Jun. 2014), 139-146.
6. Bowman, D.A. et al. 2001. An Introduction to 3-D User Interface Design. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 10, 1 (Feb. 2001), 96-108.
7. Carvalho, D. et al. 2014. Different interaction paradigms for different user groups: an evaluation regarding content selection. Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Human Computer Interaction - Interaccion'14 (Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Spain, Sep. 2014), 40.
8. Carvalho, D. et al. 2015. Interaction Paradigms Versus Age-Related User Profiles: an Evaluation on Content Selection. IEEE Latin America Transactions. 13, 2, 532-539.
9. Carvalho, D. et al. 2012. New Interaction Paradigms to Fight the Digital Divide: A Pilot Case Study Regarding Multi-Touch Technology. Procedia Computer Science. 14, (Jan. 2012), 128-137.
10. Constantine Stephanidis and Pier Luigi Emiliani 1999. Connecting' to the information society: a European perspective. Technology and Disability. IOS Press.
11. Dam, A. van 1997. Post-WIMP user interfaces. Commun. ACM. 40, 2 (1997), 63-67.
12. Findlater, L. et al. 2013. Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13 (New York, New York, USA, Apr. 2013), 343.
13. Galitz, W.O. 2007. The essential guide to user interface design: An introduction to GUI design principles and techniques. Wiley.
14. Hoaglin, D.C. and Iglewicz, B. 1987. Fine-Tuning Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 82, 400 (1987), 1147-1149.
15. Hourcade, J.P. et al. 2012. Multitouch tablet applications and activities to enhance the social skills of children with autism spectrum disorders. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 16, 2 (Feb. 2012), 157-168.
16. Inai, Y. 2013. Age-related differences in pointing movements in restricted visual tasks and their design implication. 2013 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering (May 2013), 439-443.
17. Jain, J. et al. 2011. The future of natural user interfaces. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI EA '11 (New York, New York, USA, May 2011), 211.
18. Krippendorff, K. 1997. Human-Centeredness: A paradigm shift invoked by the emerging cyberspaces. (Zentrum für Kunst und Medientechnologie, Karlsruhe, Germany, 1997), 8.
19. Lech, M. and Kostek, B. 2010. Gesture-based computer control system applied to the interactive whiteboard. Information Technology (ICIT), 2010 2nd International Conference on.
20. Lee, S. et al. 2005. A gesture-based american sign language game for deaf children. CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '05 (New York, New York, USA, Apr. 2005), 1589.
21. Lievens, J. and Van Daele, T. 2015. Touch Teach Learn. Unlocking the potential of touch enabled mobile devices for higher education. INTED 2015 Proceedings 9th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (Mar. 2015), 5298-5304.
22. MacKenzie, I.S. 1992. Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction. Human-Computer Interaction. 7, 1 (Mar. 1992), 91-139.
23. Marchionini, G. and Sibert, J. 1991. An agenda for human-computer interaction: science and engineering serving human needs. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin. 23, 4 (Oct. 1991), 17-32.
24. Martinez-Maldonado, R. et al. 2014. Multi-touch technology in a higher-education classroom. Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures the Future of Design - OzCHI '14 (New York, USA, Dec. 2014), 220-229.
25. McKee, J.H. et al. 2015. Integrated Electronic Health Care Coordination System with Touch Screen Tablets and Smartphones. Google Patents.
26. Nawaz, A. et al. 2014. Designing Smart Home Technology for Fall Prevention in Older People. Communications in Computer and Information Science. C. Stephanidis, ed. Springer International Publishing. 485-490.
27. Nielsen, J. 1993. Noncommand user interfaces. Communications of the ACM. 36, 4 (Apr. 1993), 83-99.
28. Oviatt, S. and Cohen, P. 2000. Perceptual user interfaces: multimodal interfaces that process what comes naturally. Communications of the ACM. 43, 3 (Mar. 2000), 45-53.
29. Pietinen, S. et al. 2008. A method to study visual attention aspects of collaboration: eye-tracking pair programmers simultaneously. (2008), 39-42.
30. Reilly, R.B. 1998. Applications of face and gesture recognition for human-computer interaction. 20-27.
31. Sambrooks, L. and Wilkinson, B. 2013. Comparison of gestural, touch, and mouse interaction with Fitts' law. Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration - OzCHI '13 (New York, New York, USA, Nov. 2013), 119-122.
32. Schapira, E. and Sharma, R. 2001. Experimental evaluation of vision and speech based multimodal interfaces. Proceedings of the 2001 workshop on Percetive user interfaces - PUI '01 (New York, New York, USA, Nov. 2001), 1.
33. Soegaard, M. and Dam, R.F. 2014. The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed. The Interaction Design Foundation.
34. Stephanidis, C. 2001. User Interfaces for All: New Perspectives into Human-Computer Interaction. User Interfaces for All - Concepts, Methods, and Tools. C. Stephanidis, ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 760.
35. Ullmer, B. and Ishii, H. 2001. Emerging Frameworks for Tangible User Interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millenium. Addison-Wesley Professional. 579-601.
36. Vertegaal, R. 2003. Attentive User Interfaces. Communications of ACM. 46(3), Editorial, Special Issue on Attentive User Interfaces (2003).
37. Vogel, D. and Baudisch, P. 2007. Shift: a technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '07 (New York, USA, Apr. 2007), 657.
38. Xiaohua Yu et al. 2010. An exploration of developing multi-touch virtual learning tools for young children. 2010 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer (Jun. 2010), V3-4-V3-7.
39. Yu, B. et al. 2015. Breathe with Touch: A Tactile Interface for Breathing Assistance System. Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2015 SE - 4. J. Abascal et al., eds. Springer International Publishing. 45-52.