A Multicenter Evaluation of the Performance and Usability of a Novel Glucose Monitoring System in Chinese Adults with Diabetes

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 290-295

  Ji, Linong ^a   Guo, Xiaohui ^b   Guo, Lixin ^c   Ren, Qian ^a   Yu, Nan ^b   Zhang, Jie ^c  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY PEOPLE S HOSPITAL   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY FIRST HOSPITAL   (China)

^c BEIJING HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

flash glucose monitoring; FreeStyle Libre; performance; sensor accuracy; usability

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CAPILLARY BLOOD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSTANTS AND COEFFICIENTS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE SENSOR; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INSULIN TREATMENT; INTERSTITIAL FLUID; MALE; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE; MEAN ABSOLUTE RELATIVE DIFFERENCE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; MULTICENTER STUDY; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; VENOUS BLOOD; ANALYSIS; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BLOOD; CHINA; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEVICES; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CHINA; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85014575166     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296816662884     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Weinstock RS, Xing D, Maahs DM, et al. Severe Hypoglycemia and Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Results from the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 98: 3411-3419.
2. Weber KK, Lohmann T, Busch K, Donati-Hirsch I, Riel R,. High frequency of unrecognized hypoglycaemias in patients with type 2 diabetes is discovered by continuous glucose monitoring. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2007; 115: 491-494.
3. Riveline JP, Schaepelynck P, Chaillous L, et al. EVADIAC Sensor Study Group. Assessment of patient-led or physician-driven continuous glucose monitoring in patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes using basal-bolus insulin regimens: a 1-year multicenter study. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35: 965-971.
4. Ehrhardt NM, Chellappa M, Walker MS, Fonda SJ, Vigersky RA,. The effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011; 5: 668-675.
5. Vigersky RA, Fonda SJ, Chellappa M, Walker MS, Ehrhardt NM,. Short- and long-term effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35: 32-38.
6. Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Bailey T, et al. Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: the ambulatory glucose profile. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013; 7: 562-578.
7. Matthaei S, Antuña DeAlaiz R, Bosi E, Evans M, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn N, Joubert M,. Consensus recommendations for the use of ambulatory glucose profile in clinical practice. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis. 2014; 14: 153-157.
8. Joubert M, Baillot-Rudoni S, Catargi B, et al. EVAluation dans le Diabète des Implants ACtifs Group (EVADIAC). Indication, organization, practical implementation and interpretation guidelines for retrospective CGM recording: a French position statement. Diabetes Metab. 2015; 41: 498-508.
9. Bailey T, Bode BW, Christiansen MP, Klaff LJ, Alva S,. The performance and usability of a factory-calibrated flash glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015; 17: 787-794.
10. Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, Ginsberg BH,. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 1143-1148.
11. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL,. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1987; 10: 622-628.
12. Kovatchev BP, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Clarke WL,. Evaluating the accuracy of continuous glucose-monitoring sensors. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27: 1922-1928.
13. Feldman B, Brazg R, Schwartz S, Weinstein R,. A continuous glucose sensor based on wired enzyme technology-results from a 3-day trial in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2003; 5: 769-779.
14. Hoss U, Jeddi I, Schulz M, Budiman E, Bhogal C, McGarraugh G,. Continuous glucose monitoring in subcutaneous tissue using factory-calibrated sensors: a pilot study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010; 12: 591-597.
15. Hoss U, Budiman ES, Liu H, Christiansen MP,. Continuous glucose monitoring in the subcutaneous tissue over a 14- day sensor wear period. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013; 7: 1210-1219.
16. Hoss U, Budiman ES, Liu H, Christiansen MP,. Feasibility of factory calibration for subcutaneous glucose sensors in subjects with diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 8: 89-94.
17. Weinstein RL, Schwartz SL, Brazg RL, Bugler JR, Peyser TA, McGarraugh GV,. Accuracy of the 5-Day FreeStyle Navigator continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30: 1125-1130.
18. Zhou J, Lv X, Mu Y, et al. The accuracy and efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring sensor in Chinese diabetes patients: a multicenter study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012; 14: 710-718.