Continuous glucose monitoring in the subcutaneous tissue over a 14-day sensor wear period

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1210-1219

  Hoss, Udo ^a   Budiman, Erwin S ^a   Liu, Hanqing ^a   Christiansen, Mark P ^b  

^a ABBOTT LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b Diablo Clinical Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Glucose monitoring; Sensor wear duration; Subcutaneous

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CAPILLARY BLOOD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE SENSOR; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; PRURITUS; SKIN MANIFESTATION; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; ADOLESCENT; AGED; ANALYSIS; BLOOD; DEVICES; GENETIC PROCEDURES; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84898461270     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700511     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Mastrototaro JJ. The MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2000;2 Suppl 1:S13-8. (Pubitemid 32107467)
2. Bailey T, Zisser H, Chang A. New features and performance of a next-generation seven-day continuous glucose monitoring system with short lag time. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11(12):749-55.
3. Chamberlain JJ, Small D. Case study: successful use of a single subcutaneous continuous glucose monitor sensor for 28 days in a patient with type 1 diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2008;26(3):138-9.
4. Garg SK, Voelmle MK, Gottlieb P. Feasibility of 10-day use of a continuous glucose-monitoring system in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(3):436-8.
5. Wisniewski N, Moussy F, Reichert WM. Characterization of implantable biosensor membrane biofouling. Fresenius J Anal Chem. 2000;366(6-7):611-21.
6. Klueh U. Analysis: on the path to overcoming glucose-sensor-induced foreign body reactions. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(2):452-4.
7. Van den Bosch EE, de Bont NH, Qiu J, Gelling OJ. A promising solution to enhance the sensocompatibility of biosensors in continuous glucose monitoring systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(2):455-64.
8. Ward WK, Wood MD, Casey HM, Quinn MJ, Federiuk IF. The effect of local subcutaneous delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor on the function of a chronically implanted amperometric glucose sensor. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2004;6(2):137-45. (Pubitemid 38445739)
9. Hoss U, Jeddi I, Schulz M, Budiman E, Bhogal C, McGarraugh G. Continuous glucose monitoring in subcutaneous tissue using factorycalibrated sensors: a pilot study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12(8):591-7.
10. Geoffrey M, Brazg R, Richard W. FreeStyle Navigator continuous glucose monitoring system with TRUstart Algorithm, a 1-hour warm-up time. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(1):99-106.
11. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15197:2013. In vitro diagnostic test systems - requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/ catalogue-ics/catalogue-detail-ics.htm?csnumber=54976.
12. Damiano ER, El-Khatib FH, Zheng H, Nathan DM, Russell SJ. A comparative efectiveness analysis of three continuous glucose monitors. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(2):251-9.
13. Kovatchev B, Anderson S, Heinemann L, Clarke W. Comparison of the numerical and clinical accuracy of four continuous glucose monitors. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(6):1160-4.
14. Diabetes Research In Children Network (Direcnet) Study Group, Buckingham BA, Kollman C, Beck R, Kalajian A, Fiallo-Scharer R, Tansey MJ, Fox LA, Wilson DM, Weinzimer SA, Ruedy KJ, Tamborlane WV. Evaluation of factors afecting CGMS calibration. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2006;8(3):318-25.
15. Rebrin K, Sheppard NF Jr, Steil GM. Use of subcutaneous interstitial fluid glucose to estimate blood glucose: revisiting delay and sensor offset. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(5):1087-98.
16. Brazg RL, Klaf LJ, Parkin CG. Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(1):144-52.
17. McGarraugh G. The chemistry of commercial continuous glucose monitors. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11 Suppl 1:S17-24.