Use of ICSI in IVF cycles in women with tubal ligation does not improve pregnancy or live birth rates

Human Reproduction

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 2750-2755

  Grimstad, F W ^a   Nangia, Ajay K ^b   Luke, B ^c   Stern, J E ^d   Mak, W ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

ICSI; IVF; Live birth; Male factor; SART; Tubal ligation

Indexed keywords

BIRTH WEIGHT; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE COURSE; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LIVE BIRTH; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; MODEL; ODDS RATIO; OOCYTE; PHYSICIAN; PREGNANCY; RACE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SMOKING; STUDY DESIGN; UTERINE TUBE LIGATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIRTH RATE; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; INFERTILITY; MIDDLE AGED; PREGNANCY RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIRTH RATE; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFERTILITY; MIDDLE AGED; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85014489886     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew247     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ASRM. Committee opinion: role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2012;97:539-545.
2. ASRM and SART. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: A committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1395-1399.
3. Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MP, Shaaban M, Khalaf Y, Seddler M, Ghobara T, Braude P, Kennedy R, Rutherford A, Hartshorne G et al. Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: A randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2001;357:2075-2079.
4. Bonduelle M, Legein J, Buysse A, Van Assche E, Wisanto A, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC, Liebaers I. Prospective follow-up study of 423 children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1558-1564.
5. Bonduelle M, Liebaers I, Deketelaere V, Derde MP, Camus M, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Neonatal data on a cohort of 2889 infants born after ICSI (1991-1999) and of 2995 infants born after IVF (1983-1999). Hum Reprod 2002;17:671-694.
6. Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA 2015;313:255-263.
7. CDC. Assisted Reproductive Technology, National Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: CDC, 2013.
8. Clifton D, Kaneda T. Family Planning Worldwide 2013 Data Sheet. Washington, DC: Bureau PR, 2013.
9. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Van Essen P, Priest K, Scott H, Haan EA, Chan A. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1803-1813.
10. ESHRE. Good Clinical Treatment in Assisted Reproduction. ESHRE central office, Grimbergen, Belgium: ESHRE, 2008.
11. Farhi A, Reichman B, Boyko V, Mashiach S, Hourvitz A, Margalioth EJ, Levran D, Calderon I, Orvieto R, Ellenbogen A et al. Congenital malformations in infants conceived following assisted reproductive technology in comparison with spontaneously conceived infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:1171-1179.
12. Fleming S. An inconvenient truth: ICSI is not necessary for the majority of IVF patients BioNews. Progress Educational Trust, London WC1X 8AX, UK, 2013.
13. Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2010.
14. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2002;346:725-730.
15. Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Tylor LR, Peterson HB. Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:889-895.
16. Int Veld P, Brandenburg H, Verhoeff A, Dhont M, Los F. Sex chromosomal abnormalities and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet 1995;346:773.
17. Katalinic A, Rosch C, Ludwig M, German IF-USG. Pregnancy course and outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A controlled, prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1604-1616.
18. Kissin DM, Zhang Y, Boulet SL, Fountain C, Bearman P, Schieve L, Yeargin-Allsopp M, Jamieson DJ. Association of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment and parental infertility diagnosis with autism in ARTconceived children. Hum Reprod 2015;30:454-465.
19. Kupka MS, DHooghe T, Ferraretti AP, de Mouzon J, Erb K, Castilla JA, Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Goossens V. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2016;31:233-248.
20. Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C. Birth defects in infants conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: An alternative interpretation. BMJ 1997;315:1260-1265; discussion 1265-1266.
21. Lie RT, Lyngstadaas A, Orstavik KH, Bakketeig LS, Jacobsen G, Tanbo T. Birth defects in children conceived by ICSI compared with children conceived by other IVF-methods; a meta-Analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:696-701.
22. Loft A, Petersen K, Erb K, Mikkelsen AL, Grinsted J, Hald F, Hindkjaer J, Nielsen KM, Lundstrom P, Gabrielsen A et al. A Danish national cohort of 730 infants born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) 1994-1997. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2143-2148.
23. Mansour R, Ishihara O, Adamson GD, Dyer S, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Sullivan E, Zegers-Hochschild F. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2006. Hum Reprod 2014;29:1536-1551.
24. Nangia AK, Luke B, Smith JF, Mak W, Stern JE. National study of factors influencing assisted reproductive technology outcomes with male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 2011;96:609-614.
25. Sutcliffe AG, Taylor B, Li J, Thornton S, Grudzinskas JG, Lieberman BA. Children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: population control study. BMJ 1999;318:704-705.
26. Tararbit K, Lelong N, Thieulin AC, Houyel L, Bonnet D, Goffinet F, Khoshnood B, Group ES. The risk for four specific congenital heart defects associated with assisted reproductive techniques: A populationbased evaluation. Hum Reprod 2013;28:367-374.
27. van Rumste MM, Evers JL, Farquhar CM. Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional techniques for oocyte insemination during in vitro fertilization in patients with non-male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;2:CD001301.
28. Wilcox LS, Chu SY, Peterson HB. Characteristics of women who considered or obtained tubal reanastomosis: results from a prospective study of tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:661-665.
29. Yan J, Huang G, Sun Y, Zhao X, Chen S, Zou S, Hao C, Quan S, Chen ZJ. Birth defects after assisted reproductive technologies in China: Analysis of 15, 405 offspring in seven centers (2004 to 2008). Fertil Steril 2011;95: 458-460.