Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 313, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 255-263

  Boulet, Sheree L ^a   Mehta, Akanksha ^a,b   Kissin, Dmitry M ^a,b   Lee, Warner ^a   Kawwass, Jennifer F ^a,b   Jamieson, Denise J ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LIVE BIRTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALE INFERTILITY; MATERNAL AGE; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREND STUDY; UNITED STATES; COMPARATIVE STUDY; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; INFERTILITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; TRENDS; UTILIZATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFERTILITY; INFERTILITY, MALE; MALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84921462096     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.17985     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340(8810):17-18.
2. Schlegel PN, Palermo GD, Goldstein M, et al. Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for nonobstructive azoospermia. Urology. 1997;49(3):435-440.
3. Jain T, Gupta RS. Trends in the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(3):251-257.
4. Kim HH, Bundorf MK, Behr B, McCallum SW. Use and outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-male factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(3):622-628.
5. Luna M, Bigelow C, DukeM, et al. Should ICSI be recommended routinely in patients with 4 or fewer oocytes retrieved? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(10):911-915.
6. Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MP, Shaaban M, et al. Conventional in-vitro fertilisation vs intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;357(9274):2075-2079.
7. Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(6):1395-1399.
8. Bonduelle M, Van Assche E, Joris H, et al. Prenatal testing in ICSI pregnancies: incidence of chromosomal anomalies in 1586 karyotypes and relation to sperm parameters. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(10):2600-2614.
9. Gjerris AC, Loft A, Pinborg A, Christiansen M, Tabor A. Prenatal testing among women pregnant after assisted reproductive techniques in Denmark 1995-2000: a national cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(7):1545-1552.
10. Amor DJ, Halliday J. A review of known imprinting syndromes and their association with assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(12):2826-2834.
11. Sandin S, Nygren KG, Iliadou A, Hultman CM, Reichenberg A. Autism and mental retardation among offspring born after in vitro fertilization. JAMA. 2013;310(1):75-84.
12. DaviesMJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1803-1813.
13. Zhu JL, Basso O, Obel C, Bille C, Olsen J. Infertility, infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort. BMJ. 2006;333(7570):679.
14. Wu AK, Odisho AY,Washington SL III, Katz PP, Smith JF. Out-of-pocket fertility patient expense: data from a multicenter prospective infertility cohort. J Urol. 2014;191(2):427-432.
15. Wu AK, Elliott P, Katz PP, Smith JF. Time costs of fertility care: the hidden hardship of building a family. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(7):2025-2030.
16. Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992, Pub L 102-493, 1063 Stat 146-3152.
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2011 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2013.
18. Austin PC. The performance of different propensity-scoremethods for estimating relative risks. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(6):537-545.
19. Nyboe Andersen A, Carlsen E, Loft A. Trends in the use of intracytoplasmatic sperm injection marked variability between countries. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(6):593-604.
20. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. False alarms and pseudo-epidemics: the limitations of observational epidemiology. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(4):920-927.
21. Beck-Fruchter R, Lavee M, Weiss A, Geslevich Y, Shalev E. Rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):690-698.