Evaluating public participation in Denmark’s water councils: How policy design and boundary judgements affect water governance!

Outlook on Agriculture

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 225-230

  Graversgaard, Morten ^a   Thorsøe, Martin Hvarregaard ^a   Kjeldsen, Chris ^a   Dalgaard, Tommy ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Collaborative innovation; Public involvement; Water planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014482254     PISSN: 00307270     EISSN: 20436866     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0030727016675691     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Benson D, Fritsch O, Cook H, et al. (2014) Evaluating participation in WFD river basin management in England and Wales: processes, communities, outputs and outcomes. Land Use Policy 38: 213–222.
2. Birnbaum S (2016) Environmental co-governance, legitimacy, and the quest for compliance: when and why is stakeholder participation desirable? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18(3): 306–323.
3. Boeuf B and Fritsch O (2016) Studying the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Europe: a meta-analysis of 89 journal articles. Ecology and Society 21(2): 19.
4. Bourblanc M, Crabbé A, Liefferink D, et al. (2013) The marathon of the hare and the tortoise: implementing the EU Water Framework Directive. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 56(10): 1449–1467.
5. Carr G, Blöschl G and Loucks DP (2012) Evaluating participation in water resource management: a review. Water Resources Research 48: 11401.
6. Conley A and Moote MA (2003) Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 16: 371–386.
7. Dalgaard T, Hansen B, Hasler B, et al. (2014) Policies for agricultural nitrogen management-trends, challenges and prospects for improved efficiency in Denmark. Environmental Research Letters 9: 115002. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/115002.
8. European Commission (2003) Public Participation in Relation to the Water Framework Directive, Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive. Guidance Document No. 8. Luxembourg: European Commission.
9. European Commission (2009) River Basin Management in a Changing Climate, Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive. Guidance document No. 24. Luxembourg: European Commission
10. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, et al. (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473.
11. FT nr. 1606 (2013) Lov om vandplanlægning. Lov nr. 1606 af 26/12/2013. Available at: https://www.retsinformation.dk/forms/r0710.aspx?id=161126 (accessed 10 May 2016).
12. Franzén F, Hammer M and Balfors B (2015) Institutional development for stakeholder participation in local water management: an analysis of two Swedish catchments. Land Use Policy 43: 317–327.
13. Graversgaard M (2015) Evaluering af vandra°dsarbejdet. Naturstyrelsen, 2015.
14. Graversgaard M, Jacobsen BH, Kjeldsen C, et al. (2017) Engagement of water councils in river basin planning: Local knowledge and co-creation increases cost-effectiveness. Land Use Policy.
15. Hering D, Borja A, Carstens J, et al. (2010) The European water framework directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Science of the Total Environment 408: 4007–4019.
16. Hofstad H and Torfing J (2015) Collaborative innovation as a tool for environmental, economic and social sustainability in regional governance. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 19: 49–70.
17. Innes JE and Booher DE (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. Journal of the American Planning Association 65(4): 412–423.
18. Innes JE and Booher DE (2010) Planning with Complexity – An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. New York: Routledge.
19. Jager NW, Challies E, Kochskämper E, et al. (2016) Transforming European water governance? Participation and river basin management under the EU water framework directive in 13 member states. Water 8. DOI: 10.3390/w8040156 (accessed 18 July 2016).
20. Koontz T and Thomas C (2006) What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review 66: 111–121.
21. Liefferink D, Wiering Mand Uitenboogaart Y (2011) The EU water framework directive: a multi-dimensional analysis of implementation and domestic impact’. Land Use Policy 28: 712–722.
22. Lundmark C and Jonsson G (2014) Prospects for learning in river management: exploring the initial implementation of the Water Framework Directive in a Swedish river basin. Environmental Education Research 20(2): 161–176.
23. Natur- og Landbrugskommissionen (2013) Natur og landbrug – en ny start. Redaktion: Natur- og Landbrugskommissionens sekretariat.
24. Nature Agency (2014a) Vandra°dspakken notat om virkemiddelkatalog for vandløb. Available at: http://naturstyrelsen.dk/media/nst/8437103/virkemiddelkatalog.pdf (accessed 7 April 2016).
25. Nature Agency (2014b) Vejledning om arbejdet med forslag til indsatsprogram for vandløbsindsatsen. Available at: http://svana.dk/media/nst/8439930/vejledning.pdf (accessed 20 April 2016).
26. Nielsen HØ, Frederiksen P, Saarikoski H, et al. (2013) How different institutional arrangements promote integrated river basin management: evidence from the Baltic Sea region. Land Use Policy 30(1): 437–445.
27. Reed M (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141: 2417–2431.
28. Rittel HWJ and Webber MM(1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–196.
29. Sabatier PA, Focht W, Lubell M, et al. (2005) Collaborative approaches to watershed management. In: Sabatier PA, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A and Matlock M (eds) Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 3–21.
30. Sørensen E and Torfing J (2005) Netværksstyring - fra government til governance. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetsforlag, Narayana Press: Gylling.
31. Thorsøe MH, Noe E and Graversgaard M (2017) The challenge of legitimazing spatially differentiated regulation. Land Use Policy.
32. Wright S and Jacobsen BH (2011) Participation in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Denmark: the prospects for active involvement. Water Policy 13: 232–249.