Evidence-Based Practices: The Complexities of Implementation

Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 3-7

  Agran, Martin ^a   Spooner, Fred ^b   Singer, George H S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014426701     PISSN: 15407969     EISSN: 21692408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1540796916685050     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Agran M., Spooner F., Brown F., (2015). Research and values: An inextricable relationship. In Agran M., Spooner F., Gee K., Trader B., (Eds.), TASH: 40 years of progressive leadership (pp. 50-57). Virginia Beach, VA: Donning Publishers.
2. Bailey C., (1975). Curriculum guidelines for teaching profound and severely retarded students (I.Q. under 40) including those with physical handicaps. The American Association for the Education of the Severely/Profoundly Handicapped Review, 1 (1), 1-17.
3. Browder D., Wood L., Thompson J., Ribuffo C., (2014). Evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities. Gainesville, FL: The CEEDAR Center.
4. Burns M. K., Ysseldyke J. E., (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 3-11. doi: 10.1177/0022466908315563
5. Cook B. G., Cook S. C., (2011). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 47, 71-82. doi: 10.1177/0022466911420877
6. Every Student Succeeds Act, Pub. L. No. 114-95, § 1177 Stat. (2015).
7. Horner R. H., Carr E. G., Halle J., McGee G., Odom S., Wolery M., (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-180. doi: 10.1177/001440290507100203
8. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400. (2004).
9. Johnston J. M., (2016). Afterword: A decade later. In Foxx R. M., Mulick J. A., (Eds.), Controversial therapies for autism and intellectual disabilities: Fads, fashion and science in professional practice (2nd ed., pp. 523-528). New York, NY: Routledge.
10. Kozleski E. B., (2017). The uses of qualitative research: Powerful methods to inform evidence-based practice in education. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 43, 19-32. doi: 10.1177/1540796916683710
11. Lilienfeld S. O., Marshall J., Todd J. T., Shane H. C., (2015). The persistence of fad interventions in the face of negative scientific evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8, 62-101. doi: 10.1080/17489539.2014.976332
12. Mirenda P., (2017). Values, practice, science, and AAC. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 43, 33-41. doi: 10.1177/1540796916661163
13. Mostert M., (2014). An activist approach to debunking FC. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 203-210.
14. Mulick J. A., Butter E. M., (2016). Positive behavior support: A paternalistic utopian delusion. In Foxx R. M., Mulick J. A., (Eds.), Controversial therapies for autism and intellectual disabilities: Fads, fashion and science in professional practice (2nd ed., pp. 303-321). New York, NY: Routledge.
15. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2006). Odom S. L., Brantlinger E., Gersten R., Horner R. H., Thompson B., Harris K. R., (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137-148. doi: 10.1177/001440290507100201
16. Peck C. A., (1991). Liking values and science in social policy decision affecting citizens with severe disabilities. In Meyer L. H., Peck C. A., Brown L., (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 1-15). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
17. Powers L. E., (2017). Contributing meaning to research in developmental disabilities: Integrating participatory action and methodological rigor. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 43, 42-52. doi: 10.1177/1540796916686564.
18. Singer G. H. S., Agran M., Spooner F., (2017). Evidence-based and values-based practices for people with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 43, 62-72. doi: 10.1177/1540796916684877
19. Spooner F., McKissick B. R., Knight V. F., (2017). Establishing the state of affairs for using evidence-based practices in students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 43, 8-18. doi: 10.1177/1540796916684896
20. Vyse S., (2016). Where do fads come from? In Foxx R. M., Mulick J. A., (Eds.), Controversial therapies for autism and intellectual disabilities: Fads, fashion and science in professional practice (2nd ed., pp. 3-16). New York, NY: Routledge.
21. Wang M., Lam Y., (2017). Evidence-based practice in special education and cultural adaptations: Challenges and implications for research. Research and Practice for People With Severe Disabilities, 43, 53-61. doi: 10.1177/1540796916685872
22. Zane T., Weiss M. J., Davis C., Melton I., (2016). Evidence-based practices in treatment for autism and intellectual disabilities. In Foxx R. M., Mulick J. A., (Eds.), Controversial therapies for autism and intellectual disabilities: Fads, fashion and science in professional practice (2nd ed., pp. 487-497). New York, NY: Routledge.