Cervical conization and the risk of preterm birth: A population-based multicentric trial of Turkish cohort

Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2017, Pages QC21-QC24

  Zebitay, Ali Galip ^a   Güngör, Emre Sinan ^a   Ilhan, Gülsah ^a   Çetin, Orkun ^b   Dane, Cem ^c   Furtuna, Canan ^a   Atmaca, Fatma Ferda Verit ^a   Tuna, Merve ^c  

^a Suleymaniye Education and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

^b YUZUNCU YIL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c Haseki Education and Training Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Cold conisation; Preterm birth risk factors; Term birth

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CERVICAL LENGTH MEASUREMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; MULTICENTER STUDY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE LABOR; RISK FACTOR; SQUAMOUS INTRAEPITHELIAL LESION OF THE CERVIX; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); UROGENITAL TRACT INFECTION; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

EID: 85014351057     PISSN: 2249782X     EISSN: 0973709X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22996.9495     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Arbyn M, Stasinou SM, Martin-Hirsch P, Bennett P, Paraskevaidis E. Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:6192.
2. Ortoft G, Henriksen T, Hansen E, Petersen L. After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy. BJOG. 2010;117(3):258-67.
3. Kalliala I, Anttila A, Dyba T, Hakulinen T, Halttunen M, Nieminen P. Pregnancy incidence and outcome among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2012;119:227-35.
4. Frega A, Sesti F, De Sanctis L, Pacchiarotti A, Votano S, Biamonti A, et al. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstetr. 2013;122:145-49.
5. Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Thoresen S, Irgens LM, Iversen OE. Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:a1343.
6. Armarnik S, Sheiner E, Piura B, Meirovitz M, Zlotnik A, Levy A. Obstetric outcome following cervical conization. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283(4):765-69.
7. Blomfield PI, Buxton J, Dunn J, Luesley DM. Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 1993;169:620-25.
8. Cruickshank ME, Flannelly G, Campbell DM, Kitchener HC. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Br J Obstetr Gynaecol. 1995;102:467-70.
9. Sjoborg KD, Vistad I, Myhr SS, Svenningsen R, Herzog C, Kloster-Jensen A, et al. Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case-control study. Acta Obstetr Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:423-28.
10. Beckmann CRB, Ling FW, Barzansky BM, Herbert WNP, Loube DW, Smith RP. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 6th edition. pp.202.
11. Spong CY. Prediction and prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:405-15.
12. Simoens C, Goffin F, Simon P, Barlow P, Antoine J, Foidart JM, et al. Adverse obstetrical outcomes after treatment of precancerous cervical lesions: a Belgian multicentre study. BJOG. 2012;119(10):1247-55.
13. Sozen H, Namazov A, Cakir S, Akdemir Y, Vatansever D, Karateke A. Pregnancy outcomes after cold knife conization related to excised cone dimensions. A retrospective cohort study. J Reprod Med. 2014;59(1-2):81-86.
14. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:567-72.
15. Fonseca EB, Celik E, Parra M, Singh M, Kypros H. Nicolaides. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:462-69.
16. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and subsequent risk for spontaneous preterm delivery: a population-based study of singleton deliveries during a 9-year period. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):33.e1-6.
17. Crane JM, Hutchens D. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:579-87.
18. Hassan SS, Romero R, Vidyadhari D, Fusey S, Baxter JK, Khandelwal M, et al. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:18-31.
19. Zebitay G, Verit F, Sakar MN, Keskin S, Cetin O, Ulusoy A. Importance of cervical length in dysmenorrhea aetiology. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36(4):540-43.
20. Andía D, Mozo de Rosales F, Villasante A, Rivero B, Díez J, Pérez C. Pregnancy outcome in patients treated with cervical conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112(3):225-28.
21. Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentrer and randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:516-23.
22. Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18-22 weeks gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:902-07.
23. Hibbard JU, Tart M, Moawad AH. Cervical length at 16-22 weeks' gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:972-78.
24. Kushnir O, Vigil DA, Izquierdo L, Schiff M, Curet LB.. Vaginal ultrasonographic assessment of cervical length changes during normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:991-93.
25. Bevis KS, Biggio JR. Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(1):19-27.