Getting Up to Speed: The Future of Supercomputing

Getting Up to Speed: The Future of Supercomputing

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-289

  Graham, Susan L ^a   Snir, Marc ^a   Patterson, Cynthia A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION;

ADVANCED SIMULATION; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; COMPUTING PROGRAM; DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY; EARTH SIMULATORS; INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES; NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

SUPERCOMPUTERS;

EID: 85014324703     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.17226/11148     Document Type: Book

References (163)

1. National Research Council (NRC). 2003. The Future of Supercomputing: An Interim Report. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
2. National Science Board. 1982. Report of the Panel on Large Scale Computing in Science and Engineering. Washington, D.C., December 26 (the Lax Report).
3. NSF. 1993. From Desktop to Teraflop: Exploiting the U.S. Lead in High Performance Computing. NSF Blue Ribbon Panel on High Performance Computing. Arlington, Va.: NSF, August.
4. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/R?d102:FLD002:@1(102+194).
5. NSF. 1995. Report of the Task Force on the Future of the NSF Supercomputer Centers Program. September 15.
6. NRC. 1995. Evolving the High Performance Computing and Communications Initiative to Support the Nation's Infrastructure. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
7. PITAC. 1999. Report to the President. Information Technology Research: Investing in Our Future. February.
8. Defense Science Board. 2000. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on DoD Supercomputing Needs. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology. October 11.
9. http://www.hpcc.gov/hecrtf-outreach/bibliography/200302_hec.pdf
10. DOE, Office of Science. 2003. "A Science-Based Case for Large Scale Simulation." Scales Workshop Report, Vol. 1. July. Available online at .
11. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:S.2176:.
12. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:HR04516:.
13. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/R?r108:FLD001:S61181
14. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c108:3:./temp/~c108qnbgq9::
15. NRC. 2003. The Future of Supercomputing: An Interim Report. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
16. Rubin H. Landau and Paul J. Fink, Jr. 1993. A Scientist's and Engineer's Guide to Workstations and Supercomputers. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Federal Register, February 24, 1994, at .
18. NSF. 2003. Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure. NSF Blue- Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure.
19. Leonardo Dagum and Ramesh Menon. 1998. "OpenMP: An Industry-Standard API for Shared-Memory Programming." IEEE Journal of Computational Science and Engineering (5)1.
20. Tarek A. El-Ghazawi, William W. Carlson, and Jesse M. Draper, UPC Language Specification (V 1.1.1),
21. Robert W. Numrich and John Reid, 1998, "Co-array Fortran for Parallel Programming," SIGPLAN Fortran Forum 17(2), 1-31.
22. J. Nieplocha, R.J. Harrison, and R.J. Littlefield, 1996, "Global Arrays: A Nonuniform Memory Access Programming Model for High-Performance Computers," Journal of Supercomputing 10, 197-220.
23. Katherine Yelick, Luigi Semenzato, Geoff Pike, Carleton Miyamoto, Ben Liblit, Arvind Krishnamurthy, Paul Hilfinger, Susan Graham, David Gay, Philip Colella, and Alexander Aiken, 1998, "Titanium: A High-Performance Java Dialect," Concurrency: Practice and Experience 10, 825-836.
24. JASON Program Office. 2003. Requirements for ASCI. July 29.
25. L. Carrington, A. Snavely, X. Gao, and N. Wolter. 2003. A Performance Prediction Framework for Scientific Applications. ICCS Workshop on Performance Modeling and Analysis (PMA03). Melbourne, June.
26. S. Goedecker and A. Hoisie. 2001. Performance Optimization of Numerically Intensive Codes. Philadelphia, Pa.: SIAM Press.
27. N. Metropolis, J. Howlett, and Gian- Carlo Rota, A History of Computing in the Twentieth Century (Academic Press, 1980).
28. Flamm, 1988, pp. 36-41, 43-45.
29. Nancy Stern. 1981. From ENIAC to UNIVAC: An Appraisal of the Eckert-Mauchly Computers. Digital Press.
30. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_7030
31. G. Gray, "The UNIVAC III Computer," Unisys History Newsletter 2(1) (revised 1999), .
32. Y. Oyanagi, 1999, "Development of Supercomputers in Japan: Hardware and Software," Parallel Computing 25:1545-1567.
33. D.K. Kahaner. 1992. "High Performance Computing in Japan: Supercomputing." Asian Technology Information Program. June.
34. Alex Roland and Phillip Shiman, 2002, Strategic Computing: DARPA and the Quest for Machine Intelligence, 1983-1993, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
35. Gordon Bell, "PACT 98," a slide presentation available at .
36. E. Strohmaier, J.J. Dongarra, and H.W. Meuer, 1999, "Marketplace of High-Performance Computing," Parallel Computing 25(13):1517-1544.
37. C.L. Lawson, R.J. Hanson, D.R. Kincaid, and F.T. Krogh, 1979, "Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms for Fortran Usage," ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 5:308-325.
38. J.J. Dongarra, J. Du Croz, S. Hammarling, and R.J. Hanson, 1988, "An Extended Set of Fortran Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms," ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 14(1):1-17.
39. J.J. Dongarra, J. Du Croz, S. Hammarling, and I.S. Duff, "A Set of Level 3 Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms," ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 16(1):1-17.
40. Alex Roland and Philip Shiman, 2002. Strategic Computing: DARPA and the Quest for Machine Intelligence, 1983- 1993, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. pp. 308-317.
41. DARPA, Technology Transition, 1997, pp. 42, 45.
42. http://www.top500.org
43. http://www.llnl.gov/asci/platforms/platforms.html
44. H.W. Meuer, 1994, "The Mannheim Supercomputer Statistics 1986-1992," TOP500 Report 1993, J.J. Dongarra, H.W. Meuer, and E. Strohmaier, eds., University of Mannheim, pp. 1-15.
45. Erich Strohmaier, Jack J. Dongarra, Hans W. Meuer, and Horst D. Simon, 1999, "The Marketplace of High Performance Computing," Parallel Computing 25(13-14):1517-1544.
46. LBNL. 2002. DOE Greenbook-Needs and Directions in High-Performance Computing for the Office of Science. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy. April, p. 1.
47. http://www.psc.edu/publicinfo/news/2002/planets_2002-12-11.html
48. J. Dubinski, R. Humble, U.-L. Pen, C. Loken, and P. Martin, 2003, "High Performance Commodity Networking in a 512-CPU Teraflops Beowulf Cluster for Computational Astrophysics," Paper submitted to the SC2003 conference.
49. Benoit Roux and Klaus Schulten. 2004. "Computational Studies of Membrane Channels." Structure 12 (August): 1.
50. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center. 2002. "NERSC Helps Climate Scientists Complete First-Ever 1,000-Year Run of Nation's Leading Climate-Change Modeling Application."
51. http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/NERSC-1000-Yearclimate-model.html
52. D. Chen, P. Chen, N.H. Christ, G. Fleming, C. Jung, A. Kahler, S. Kasow, Y. Luo, C. Malureanu, and C.Z. Sui. 1998. "3 Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics Computations."
53. NRC. 1995. Evolving the High Performance Computing and Communications Initiative to Support the Nation's Information Infrastructure. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, p. 35.
54. NRC. 1995. Evolving the High Performance Computing and Communications Initiative to Support the Nation's Information Infrastructure. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, p. 108.
55. Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2002. Report on High Performance Computing for the National Security Community.
56. NRC. 1995. Evolving the High Performance Computing and Communications Initiative to Support the Nation's Information Infrastructure. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, pp. 17-18.
57. http://cch.loria.fr/documentation/IEEE754/#SGI_man
58. Jonathan M. Borwein and David H. Bailey. 2004. Mathematics by Experiment: Plausible Reasoning in the 21st Century. Natick, Mass.: A.K. Peters.
59. Jonathan M. Borwein, David H. Bailey, and Roland Girgensohn. 2004. Experimental Mathematics: Computational Paths to Discovery. Natick, Mass.: A.K. Peters.
60. NITRD High End Computing Revitalization Task Force (HECRTF). 2003. Report of the Workshop on the Roadmap for the Revitalization of High-End Computing. Daniel A. Reed, ed. June 16-20, Washington, D.C.
61. DOE, Office of Science. 2003. "A Science-Based Case for Large-Scale Simulation," Scales Workshop Report, Vol. 1, July.
62. Department of Defense, National Security Agency. 2002. Report on High Performance Computing for the National Security Community. July 1.
63. NITRD HECRTF. 2004. Federal Plan for High End Computing. May.
64. http://www.darpa.mil/ipto/programs/hpcs/index.htm
65. Richard Games. 2001. Survey and Analysis of the National Security High Performance Computing Architectural Requirements. MITRE Corp. June 4.
66. High-End Crusader. 2004. "HEC Analysis: The High-End Computing Productivity Crisis." HPC Wire 13(15).
67. CNN. 2004. "Supercomputers Race to Predict Storms." September 16.
68. http://www.ccsm.ucar.edu/
69. Robert Malone, John Drake, Philip Jones, and Douglas Rotman. In press. "High-End Computing in Climate Modeling." A Science-Based Case for Large-Scale Simulation. D. Keyes, ed. Philadephia, Pa.: SIAM Press.
70. John Gartner. 2004. "Supercomputers Speed Car Design." Wired News. April 26.
71. Erik P. DeBenedictus. 2004. "Completing the Journey of Moore's Law," Presentation at the University of Illinois, May 5.
72. http://sdcd.gsfc.nasa.gov/ESS/olson.finalreport/final_report.html
73. P.J. Tackley, J.R. Baumgardner, G.A. Glatzmaier, P. Olson, and T. Clune, 1999, "Three-Dimensional Spherical Simulations of Convection in Earth's Mantle and Core Using Massively-Parallel Computers," Advanced Simulations Technologies Conference, San Diego, pp. 95-100.
74. Thomas Schulthess. 2004. "Ab-initio Monte Carlo for Nanomagnetism." ORNL White Paper.
75. "Accelerating the Revolution in Computational Materials Science," 2002, .
76. "Computational Design of Catalysts: Building the Science Case for Ultrascale Simulations," 2002, .
77. F. Gygi, G. Galli, J.C. Grossman, and V. Bulatov. 2002. "Impact of Earth-Simulator-Class Computers on Computational Nanoscience and Materials Science." DOE Ultrascale Simulation White Paper.
78. W.J. Dally. 2001. The Last Classical Computer. Information Science and Technology (ISAT) Study Group, sponsored by the Institute for Defense Analyses and DARPA.
79. http://www.infinibandta.org/home
80. L. Carrington, A. Snavely, X. Gao, and N. Wolter. 2003. "A Performance Prediction Framework for Scientific Applications." International Conference on Computational Science Workshop on Performance Modeling and Analysis (PMA03). Melbourne, June.
81. C. Bell et al., 2003, "An Evaluation of Current High-Performance Networks," 17th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium.
82. D.E. Culler et al., 1996, "Performance Assessment of Faster Network Interfaces," IEEE Micro, February.
83. J. Dongarra and T. Dunigan, 1997, "Message-Passing Performance of Various Computers," Concurrency: Practice and Experience 9(10):915-926.
84. NASA, Office of Aerospace Technology Commercial Technology Division. 2003. "Faster Aerodynamic Simulation with Cart3D." Spinoff 2003, p. 56.
85. R. Barrett, M. Berry, T.F. Chan, J. Demmel, J. Donato, J. Dongarra, V. Eijkhout, R. Pozo, C. Romine, and H. van der Vorst. 1994. Templates for the Solution of Linear Systems: Building Blocks for Iterative Methods. Philadelphia, Pa.: SIAM Press.
86. Zhaojun Bai, James Demmel, Jack Dongarra, Axel Ruhe, and Henk van der Vorst. 2000. Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide. Philadelphia, Pa.: SIAM Press.
87. Richard Vuduc, James W. Demmel, Katherine A. Yelick, Shoaib Kamil, Rajesh Nishtala, and Benjamin Lee. 2002. "Performance Optimizations and Bounds for Sparse Matrix Vector Multiply." Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE SC2002. November 16-22.
88. http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net
89. http://www.openmp.org.
90. http://dacnet.rice.edu/Depts/CRPC/HPFF/index.cfm
91. http://www.co-array.org/
92. http://upc.gwu.edu/
93. http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/projects/titanium/
94. http://www.cca-forum.org/
95. http://www.cactuscode.org/
96. http://www.etnus.com/
97. http://www.lanl.gov/projects/asci/PSE/ASCIdebug.html/
98. R. Clint Whaley, Antoine Petitet, and Jack Dongarra. 2001. "Automated Empirical Optimization of Software and the ATLAS Project." Parallel Computing 27(1-2):3-35.
99. http://www.fftw.org/
100. Markus Püschel, Bryan Singer, Jianxin Xiong, José Moura, Jeremy Johnson, David Padua, Manuela Veloso, and Robert W. Johnson. 2004. "SPIRAL: A Generator for Platform-Adapted Libraries of Signal Processing Algorithms." Journal of High Performance Computing and Applications 18(1):21-45.
101. Massimiliano Poletto, Wilson C. Hsieh, Dawson R. Engler, and M. Frans Kaashoek. 1999. "C and tcc: A Language and Compiler for Dynamic Code Generation." ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 21(2):324-369.
102. http://www.netlib.org/lapack/
103. David R. Musser, Gillmer J. Derge, and Atul Saini. 2001. STL Tutorial and Reference Guide, 2nd ed.: C++ Programming with the Standard Template Library. Boston, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
104. http://public.kitware.com/VTK/index.php
105. http://hdf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/
106. http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5/
107. http://www.mscsoftware.com/products/products_detail.cfm?PI=7
108. http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/mpi/mpich/
109. http://www.netlib.org/benchweb
110. http://icl.cs.utk.edu/hpcc
111. Adrian T. Wong, Leonid Oliker, William T.C. Kramer, Teresa L. Kaltz and David H. Bailey. 2000. "ESP: A System Utilization Benchmark." Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE SC2000. November 4-10.
112. Larry Davis, 2004, "Making HPC System Acquisition Decisions Is an HPC Application," Supercomputing.
113. S. Browne, J. Dongarra, G. Ho, N. Garner, and P. Mucci. 2000. "A Portable Programming Interface for Performance Evaluation on Modern Processors." International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications: 189-204.
114. A. Hoisie, O. Lubeck, and H. Wasserman. 2000. "Performance and Scalability Analysis of Teraflop-Scale Parallel Architectures Using Multidimensional Wavefront Applications." The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 14(4).
115. D.J. Kerbyson, H. Alme, A. Hoisie, F. Petrini, H. Wasserman, and M. Gittings. 2001. "Predictive Performance and Scalability Modeling of a Large-Scale Application." Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE SC2001, IEEE. November.
116. M. Mathis, D. Kerbyson, and A. Hoisie. 2003. "A Performance Model of Non-Deterministic Particle Transport on Large-Scale Systems." Workshop on Performance Modeling and Analysis, 2003 ICCS. Melbourne, June.
117. A. Jacquet, V. Janot, R. Govindarajan, C. Leung, G. Gao, and T. Sterling. 2003. "An Executable Analytical Performance Evaluation Approach for Early Performance Prediction." Proceedings of IPDPS'03.
118. L. Carrington, A. Snavely, N. Wolter, and X. Gao. 2003. "A Performance Prediction Framework for Scientific Applications." Workshop on Performance Modeling and Analysis, 2003 ICCS. Melbourne, June.
119. A. Snavely, L. Carrington, N. Wolter, J. Labarta, R. Badia, and A. Purkayastha. 2002. "A Framework for Performance Modeling and Prediction." Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE SC2002, November.
120. http://simos.stanford.edu
121. Wm. A. Wulf and S.A. McKee. 1995. "Hitting the Wall: Implications of the Obvious." Computer Architecture News 23(1):20-24.
122. National Coordination Office for Information Technology Research and Development. 2004. Federal Plan for High-End Computing: Report of the High-End Computing Revitalization Task Force (HECRTF). May.
123. Marc Snir and David A. Bader. 2003. A Framework for Measuring Supercomputer Productivity. Technical Report. October.
124. http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/
125. http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-2/
126. Douglass Post, 2004, "The Coming Crisis in Computational Sciences," Workshop on Productivity and Performance in High-End Computing, February.
127. D. Post and R. Kendall, 2003, "Software Project Management and Quality Engineering Practices for Complex, Coupled Multi-Physics, Massively Parallel Computation Simulations: Lessons Learned from ASCI," DOE Software Quality Forum, March.
128. http://www.research.ibm.com/bluegene/index.html
129. http://www.laurentconstantin.com/en/netw/netwox/
130. http://www.parl.clemson.edu/pvfs/
131. http://www.lustre.org/
132. http://www.emsl.pnl.gov/docs/nwchem/nwchem.html
133. http://www.sandia.gov/ASCI/apps/SIERRA.html
134. http://www.cacr.caltech.edu/projects/pyre/
135. http://epubs.siam.org/sam-bin/ dbq/article/37974
136. http://epubs.siam.org/sam-bin/dbq/article/40807
137. Daniel E. Atkins. 2003. Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. January.
138. http://www.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/success/model_of_comb_process_mar_2001.pdf
139. http://www.es.jamstec.go.jp/esc/eng/ES/birth.html
140. http://www.es.jamstec.go.jp/esc/images/journal200404/index.html
141. http://www.dawning.com.cn
142. http://www.legendgrp.com
143. http://europa.eu.int/comm/ research/fp4.html
144. http:// europa.eu.int/comm/research/fp6/pdf/how-to-participate_en.pdf
145. U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. 2004. A Strategic Framework for High-End Computing, May, .
146. William R. Swart. 1991. Keynote address. SC1991, Albuquerque, N.M., November 20.
147. Linda Cohen and Roger Noll. 1991. The Technology Pork Barrel. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
148. B. Hall and J. van Reenen. 2000. "How Effective Are Fiscal Incentives for R&D? A New Review of the Evidence." Research Policy 29(4-5):449-469.
149. Nancy Gallini and Suzanne Scotchmer, 2002, "Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive Mechanism?" Innovation Policy and the Economy, Adam B. Jaffe, Josh Lerner, and Scott Stern, eds., Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
150. W.N. Washington, 1997, "A Review of the Literature: Competition Versus Sole Source Procurements," Acquisition Review Quarterly 10:173-187.
151. Steven Kelman, 1990, Procurement and Public Management: The Fear of Discretion and the Quality of Government Performance, Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute Press.
152. Shane Greenstein, 1993, "Procedural Rules and Procurement Regulations: Complexity Creates Trade-offs," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations, pp. 159-180.
153. Earl Joseph, Christopher G. Williard, and Allison Snell. 2004. Council on Competitiveness Study of U.S. Industrial HPC Users. International Data Corporation. July.
154. JASON Program Office. 2003. Requirements for ASCI. July.
155. http://www.npaci.edu/Allocations/alloc_txt.html
156. President's Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC). 1999. Information Technology Research: Investing in Our Future. Report to the President. February. Available at .
157. http://www.hpcc.gov/pitac/pitac_it2_review.pdf
158. Ken Kennedy. 2004. "PITAC Recommendations: A Report Card." Presentation to the President's Information Technology Advisory Committee. June 17. Available at .
159. National Coordination Office for Information Technology Research and Development. 2004. Advanced Foundations for American Innovation: Supplement to the President's Budget. Available online at .
160. http://www.hpcc.gov/pubs/bb.html
161. http://www.cra.org/statistics/
162. W.J. Spencer and T.E. Seidel. In press. "International Technology Roadmaps: The U.S. Semiconductor Experience." Productivity and Cyclicality in Semiconductors: Trends, Implications, and Questions. Dale W. Jorgenson and Charles W. Wessner, eds., Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
163. http://www.hpcc.gov/pubs/2004_hecrtf/20040702_hecrtf.pdf