Analyzing the Social Web

Analyzing the Social Web

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Golbeck, Jennifer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014303764     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/C2012-0-00171-8     Document Type: Book

References (69)

1. Adamic L.A., Adar E. Friends and neighbors on the web. Social Networks 2003, 25(3):211-230.
2. Backstrom L., Boldi P., Rosa M., Ugander J., Vigna S. Four degrees of separation. Computing Research Repository (CoRR) 2011, abs/1111.4.
3. Berg J., Dickhaut J., McCabe K. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 1995, 10(1):122-142.
4. Blau J.R. When weak ties are structured. Social Roles And Social Institutions: Essays in honor of Rose Laub Coser 1995, 133-147.
5. Brizan D.G., Tansel A.U. A survey of entity resolution and record linkage methodologies. Communications of the IIMA 2006, 6(3):41-50.
6. Carneiro H.A., Mylonakis E. Google trends: A web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2009, 49(10):1557-1564. (http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/49/10/1557.abstract). 10.1086/630200.
7. Trust in Society 2001, Russell Sage Foundation, New York. K. Cook (Ed.).
8. Deutsch M. Cooperation and trust. Some theoretical notes. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1962, Nebraska University Press. M.R. Jones (Ed.).
9. Dunne C., Shneiderman B. Improving graph drawing readability by incorporating readability metrics: A software tool for network analysts. May 2009, (HCIL Tech Report HCIL-2009-13), University of Maryland.
10. Dunne, C., & Shneiderman, B. (November 2012). Motif simplification: Improving network visualization readability with fan and parallel glyphs. HCIL Tech Report.
11. Eleta, I. (2012). Multilingual use of twitter: Social networks and language choice, Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion. ACM.
12. Evans A.M., Revelle W. Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust. Journal of Research in Personality 2008, 42(6):1585-1593.
13. Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2005). Why do people write for wikipedia? Incentives to contribute to open-content publishing. SIGGROUP 2005 Workshop: Sustaining Community.
14. Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378873378900217.
15. Gilbert, E.E. (2010). Computing tie strength. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois.
16. Gilbert, E., & Karahalios, K. (2009). Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems, 211-220. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1518701.1518736. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518736.
17. Glott R., Schmidt P., Ghosh R. Wikipedia survey-overview of results March 2010, United Nations University: Collaborative Creativity Group.
18. Goel, S., Muhamad, R., & Watts, D. J. (2009). Social search in 'Small-World' experiments. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on world wide web, 701-710. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1526709.1526804. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1526709.1526804.
19. Golbeck, J. (2009). Trust and nuanced profile similarity in online social networks. ACM Trans. Web 3(4):12:1-12:33. doi:10.1145/1594173.1594174. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1594173.1594174.
20. Golbeck J., Grimes J.M., Rogers A. Twitter use by the U.S. Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(8):1612-1621.
21. Golbeck, J., Robles, C., Edmondson, M., & Turner, K., (2011). Predicting Personality from Twitter. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, (pp. 149-156). Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
22. Golembiewski R., McConkie M. The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. Theories of Group Processes 1975, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. C. Cooper (Ed.).
23. Granovetter M.S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 1973, 78(6):1360-1380.
24. Gunawan, L. T. (2008). Collaboration-oriented design of disaster response system. In CHI '08 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 2613-2616. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1358628.1358727. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1358628.1358727.
25. Hardin R. Trust & Trustworthiness 2002, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
26. Harel D., Koren Y. A fast multi-scale method for drawing large graphs. Proceedings of the eighth international symposium on graph drawing (GD '00) 2000, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, (183-196). J. Marks (Ed.).
27. Johnson-George C., Swap W.C. Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982, 43(6):1306.
28. Karau S.J., Williams K.D. Understanding individual motivation in groups: The collective effort model. Groups at Work: Theory and Research 2001, 113-141.
29. Karweit, N. L. (1979). The Conditions for Peer Associations in School. Report 282, Center for Social Organization in Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
30. Kivran-Swaine, F., Govindan, P., & Naaman, M. (2011). The impact of network structure on breaking ties in online social networks: unfollowing on twitter. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on human factors in computing systems, 1101-1104. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979105. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979105.
31. Lampos V., Cristianini N. Nowcasting events from the social web with statistical learning. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 2012, 3(4):72.
32. Leskovec, J., Adamic, L. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2007). The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Trans. Web 1(1). doi:10.1145/1232722.1232727. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1232722.1232727.
33. Leskovec, J., & Faloutsos, C. (2006). Sampling from large graphs. In Proceedings of the 12th acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 631-636. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1150402.1150479. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1150402.1150479.
34. Liben-Nowell D., Kleinberg J. The link-prediction problem for social networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58(7):1019-1031.
35. Lin N., Dayton P.W., Greenwald P. Analyzing the instrumental use of relations in the context of social structure. Sociological Methods & Research 1978, 7(2):149-166.
36. Lindqvist, J., Cranshaw, J., Wiese, J., Hong, J., & Zimmerman, J. (2011). I'm the mayor of my house: Examining why people use foursquare-a social-driven location sharing application. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on human factors in computing systems, 2409-2418. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979295. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979295.
37. Livne A., Simmons M.P., Adar E., Adamic L.A. The party is over here: Structure and content in the 2010 election. Proceedings of the fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. 2010, (201-208), Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
38. Lomnitz L. Networks and Marginality 1977, Academic Press, New York.
39. Longueville, B. D., Smith, R. S., & Luraschi, G. (2009). 'OMG, from here, i can see the flames!': A use case of mining location based social networks to acquire spatiotemporal data on forest fires. In Proceedings of the 2009 international workshop on location based social networks, 73-80. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1629890.1629907. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1629890.1629907.
40. Madden M. Privacy management on social media sites. Pew Internet and American Life Project 2012.
41. Marsden P. Measuring tie strength. Social Forces 1984, 63(2):482-501.
42. McKnight D.H., Cummings L.L., Chervany N.L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23(3):473-490.
43. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2000). Trust in e-Commerce vendors: A two-stage model. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems, 532-536. Atlanta, GA, USA: Association for Information Systems. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=359640.359807.
44. Metaxas, P.T., Mustafaraj, E., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2011). How (Not) to predict elections. In: Proceedings of IEEE SocialCom/PASSAT 2011 (pp. 165-171). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6113109&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D6113109.
45. Milgram S. The small world problem. Psychology Today 1967, 2(1):60-67.
46. Mustafaraj, E., Finn, S., Whitlock, C., & Metaxas, P.T. (2011). Vocal minority versus silent majority: Discovering the opinions of the long tail. In: 2011 IEEE third international conference on social computing (2011) (pp. 103-110). http://cs.wellesley.edu/~pmetaxas/Silent-minority-Vocal-majority.pdf.
47. Neustaedter, C., Tang, A., & Tejinder, J. K. (2010). The role of community and groupware in geocache creation and maintenance. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems, 1757-1766. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753590. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1753326.1753590.
48. Nov, O. (2007). What motivates wikipedians? Communications of the ACM 50(11):60-64. doi:10.1145/1297797.1297798. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1297797.1297798.
49. O-Hara, K. (2008). Understanding geocaching practices and motivations. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1177-1186. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2008. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357239. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357239.
50. Palen, L., & Liu, S. B. (2007). Citizen communications in crisis: Anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 727-736. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1240624.1240736. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240736.
51. Plaisant, C., Grosjean, J., & Bederson, B.B. (2002). SpaceTree: Supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation. In: Procedings of IEEE symposium on information visualization, 2002 (pp. 57-64). Boston, MA.
52. Qian H., Scott C.R. Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007, 12(4):1428-1451.
53. Ratkiewicz, J., Conover, M., Meiss, M., Gonçalves, B., Patil, S., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2011). Truthy: Mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, 249-252. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1963192.1963301. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1963192.1963301.
54. Schaefer C., Coyne J.C., Lazarus R.S. The health-related functions of social support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1981, 4(4):381-406.
55. Stack C.B. All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community 1975, Basic Books.
56. Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2011). 'Voluntweeters': Self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1071-1080. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979102. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979102.
57. Strange H. Facebook and location services 2011, University of Copenhagen.
58. Stutzman, F., & Kramer-Duffield, J. (2010). Friends only: Examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in facebook. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems, 1553-1562. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753559. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1753326.1753559.
59. Sztompka P. Trust: A sociological theory 1999, Cambridge University Press.
60. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T.O., Sandner, P.G., & Welpe, I.M. (2010). Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In: Proceedings of the fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (pp. 178-185).
61. Turner, T. C., Smith, M. A., Fisher, D., & Welser, H. T. (2005). Picturing usenet: mapping computer-mediated collective action. Journal of computer-mediated communication 10(4):0. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00270.x. <>. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00270.x.
62. Valdivia A., et al. Monitoring Influenza Activity in Europe with Google Flu Trends: Comparison with the Findings of Sentinel Physician Networks-Results for 2009-10 2010, 15(29):2.
63. Watts D.J., Strogatz S.H. Collective dynamics of 'Small-world' networks. Nature 1998, 393(6684):440-442.
64. Welser H.T., Gleave E., Fisher D., Smith M.A. Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. Journal of Social Structure 2007, 8(2):1-32. (http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume8/Welser/).
65. Wu, P., Qu, Y., Preece, J., Fleischmann, K.R., Golbeck, J., Jaeger, P.T., & Shneiderman, B. (2008). Community response grid (CRG) for a university campus: Design requirements and implications. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on information systems for crisis response and management (ISCRM'08). Washington, DC, USA.
66. Yang, H.L., & Lai, C.Y. (2010). Motivations of wikipedia content contributors. Computers in human behavior 26(6):1377-1383. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.011. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563210000877.
67. Yaniv I., Kleinberger E. Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2000, November, 83(2):260-281.
68. Yates D.N., Shute M., Rotman D. Connecting the dots: When personal information becomes personally identifying on the internet. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM'10) 2010.
69. Ziegler, C. -N., & Golbeck, J. (2007). Investigating interactions of trust and interest similarity. Decision support systems 43(2):460-475. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.003. <>. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923606001655.