Deterrence and the death penalty

Deterrence and the Death Penalty

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-144

  Nagin, Daniel S ^a   Pepper, John V ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014251406     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.17226/13363     Document Type: Book

References (148)

1. National Research Council. (1978). Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates. Panel on Research on Deterrent and Incapacitative Effects. A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, and D. Nagin (Eds.), Committee on Research on Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice. Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2. Berk, R. (2005). New claims about executions and general deterrence: Déjà vu all over again? Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2(2), 303-330.
3. Cochran, J.K., and Chamlin, M.B. (2000). Deterrence and brutalization: The dual effects of executions. Justice Quarterly, 17(4), 685-706.
4. Dezhbakhsh, H., Rubin, P.H., and Shepherd, J.M. (2003). Does capital punishment have a deterrent effect? New evidence from postmoratorium panel data. American Law and Economics Review, 5(2), 344-376.
5. Donohue, J.J., and Wolfers, J. (2005). Uses and abuses of empirical evidence in the death penalty debate. Stanford Law Review, 58(3), 791-845.
6. Donohue, J.J., and Wolfers, J. (2009). Estimating the impact of the death penalty on murder. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 249-309.
7. Kovandzic, T.V., Vieraitis, L.M., and Boots, D.P. (2009). Does the death penalty save lives? Criminology & Public Policy, 8(4), 803-843.
8. Mocan, H.N., and Gittings, R.K. (2003). Getting off death row: Commuted sentences and the deterrent effect of capital punishment. Journal of Law & Economics, 46(2), 453-478.
9. National Research Council. (1978). Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates. Panel on Research on Deterrent and Incapacitative Effects, A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, and D. Nagin (Eds.). Committee on Research on Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice. Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Rubin, P.H. (2009). Don't scrap the death penalty. Criminology & Public Policy, 8(4), 853-859.
11. Shepherd, J.M. (2004). Testimony on Crime and Deterrence: Hearing on H.R. 2934, the Terrorist Penalties Enhancement Act of 2003. Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, House Judiciary Committee. Available: http://judiciary.house.gov/legacy/shepherd042104.pdf [January 2012].
12. Shepherd, J.M. (2005). Deterrence versus brutalization: Capital punishment's differing impacts among states. Michigan Law Review, 104(2), 203-255.
13. Thomson, E. (1999). Effects of an execution on homicides in California. Homicide Studies, 3(2), 129-150.
14. Zimmerman, P.R. (2009). Statistical variability and the deterrent effect of the death penalty. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 370-398.
15. Barnes, K., Sloss, D., and Thaman, S. (2009). Place matters (most): An empirical study of prosecutorial decision-making in death-eligible cases. Arizona Law Review, 51(2), 305-379.
16. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2009). Homicide-State Level Trends in One Variable. Available: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/dataonline/Search/Homicide/State/TrendsinOneVar.cfm [January 2011].
17. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2010). Capital Punishment, 2009-Statistical Tables. U.S. Department of Justice. Available: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2215 [December 2011].
18. Cook, P.J. (2009). Potential savings from abolition of the death penalty in North Carolina. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 498-529.
19. Death Penalty Information Center. (2010a). Death Sentences in the United States from 1977 by State and by Year. Available: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/death-sentences-unitedstates-1977-2008 [September 2011].
20. Death Penalty Information Center. (2010b). State by State Database. Available: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/state_by_state [January 2011].
21. Donohue, J.J., and Wolfers, J. (2005). Uses and abuses of empirical evidence in the death penalty debate. Stanford Law Review, 58(3), 791-845.
22. Espy, M.W., and Smykla, J.O. (2004). Executions in the United States, 1608-2002: The Espy File. Available: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions-us-1608-2002-espy-file [December 2011].
23. Fagan, J., Zimring, F.E., and Geller, A. (2006). Capital punishment and capital murder: Market share and the deterrent effects of the death penalty. Texas Law Review, 84(7), 1803-1867.
24. Rogers, A. (2002). "Success-at long last": The abolition of the death penalty in Massachusetts, 1928-1984. Boston College Third World Law Journal, 22(2), 281-354.
25. Andenæs, J. (1974). Punishment and Deterrence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
26. Apel, R. (in press). Sanctions, perceptions, and crime: Implications for criminal deterrence. Submitted to Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28.
27. Becker, G.S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217.
28. Blumstein, A., and Wallman, J. (2000). The Crime Drop in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Blumstein, A., and Wallman, J. (2006). The crime drop and beyond. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(1), 125-146.
30. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2010). Capital Punishment, 2009-Statistical Tables. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Available: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2215 [December 2011].
32. Cook, P.J. (1980). Research in criminal deterrence: Laying the groundwork for the second decade. Crime and Justice, 2, 211-268.
33. Cook, P.J. (1986). The relationship between victim resistance and injury in noncommercial robbery. Journal of Legal Studies, 15(2), 405-416.
34. Cook, P.J. (2009). Potential savings from abolition of the death penalty in North Carolina. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 498-529.
35. Donohue, J.J., and Wolfers, J. (2005). Uses and abuses of empirical evidence in the death penalty debate. Stanford Law Review, 58(3), 791-845.
36. Durlauf, S., and Nagin, D. (2011). The deterrent effect of imprisonment. In P.J. Cook, J. Ludwig, and J. McCrary (Eds.), Controlling Crime: Strategies and Tradeoffs (pp. 43-94). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Espy, M.W., and Smykla, J.O. (2004). Executions in the United States, 1608-2002: The Espy File. Available: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions-us-1608-2002-espy-file [December 2011].
38. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2010). Crime in the United States 2009. Washington, DC: Author.
39. Frakes, M., and Harding, M.C. (2009). The deterrent effect of death penalty eligibility: Evidence from the adoption of child murder eligibility factors. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 451-497.
40. Gilovich, T. (1983). Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1,110-1,126.
41. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
42. Kleiman, M. (2009). When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Levitt, S.D. (2004). Understanding why crime fell in the 1990s: Four factors that explain the decline and six that do not. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), 163-190.
44. Messner, S.F., Deane, G., and Beaulieu, M. (2002). A log-multiplicative association model for allocating homicides with unknown victim-offender relationships. Criminology, 40(2), 457-480.
45. Nagin, D.S. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice, 23, 1-42.
46. Packer, H.L. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47. Pogarsky, G. (2009). Deterrence and decision-making: Research questions and theoretical refinements. In M.D. Krohn, A. Lizotte and H.G. Penlly (Eds.), Handbook on Crime and Deviance (pp. 241-258). New York: Springer.
48. Texas Department of Criminal Justice. (2011). Executed Offenders. Available: http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/death_row/dr_executed_offenders.html.
49. Wadsworth, T.I.M., and Roberts, J.M. (2008). When missing data are not missing: A new approach to evaluating supplemental homicide report imputation strategies. Criminology, 46(4), 841-870.
50. Zimring, F.E. (2010). The scale of imprisonment in the United States: Twentieth century patterns and twenty-first century prospects. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100(3), 1,225-1,246.
51. Zimring, F.E., and Fagan, J. (2000). The search for causes in an era of crime declines: Some lessons from the study of New York City homicide. Crime & Delinquency, 46(4), 446-456.
52. Alarcón, A.L., and Mitchell, P.M. (2011). Executing the will of the voters?: A roadmap to mend or end the California legislature's multibillion-dollar death penalty debacle. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 44(Special), S41-S224.
53. Angrist, J.D. (1990). Lifetime earnings and the Vietnam era draft lottery: Evidence from Social Security administrative records. American Economic Review, 80(3), 313-336.
54. Angrist, J.D., and Krueger, A.B. (1991). Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 979-1,014.
55. Berk, R. (2005). New claims about executions and general deterrence: Déjà vu all over again? Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2(2), 303-330.
56. California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice. (2008). Report and Recommendations on the Administration of the Death Penalty in California. Sacramento: Author.
57. Cohen-Cole, E., Durlauf, S., Fagan, J., and Nagin, D. (2009). Model uncertainty and the deterrent effect of capital punishment. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 335-369.
58. Cook, P.J. (2009). Potential savings from abolition of the death penalty in North Carolina. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 498-529.
59. Dezhbakhsh, H., and Shepherd, J.M. (2006). The deterrent effect of capital punishment: Evidence from a "judicial experiment." Economic Inquiry, 44(3), 512-535.
60. Dezhbakhsh, H., Rubin, P.H., and Shepherd, J.M. (2003). Does capital punishment have a deterrent effect? New evidence from postmoratorium panel data. American Law and Economics Review, 5(2), 344-376.
61. Donohue, J.J., and Wolfers, J. (2005). Uses and abuses of empirical evidence in the death penalty debate. Stanford Law Review, 58(3), 791-845.
62. Donohue, J.J., and Wolfers, J. (2009). Estimating the impact of the death penalty on murder. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 249-309.
63. Durlauf, S., Navarro, S., and Rivers, D.A. (2010). Understanding aggregate crime regressions. Journal of Econometrics, 158(2), 306-317.
64. Fagan, J., Zimring, F.E., and Geller, A. (2006). Capital punishment and capital murder: Market share and the deterrent effects of the death penalty. Texas Law Review, 84(7), 1,803-1,867.
65. Frakes, M., and Harding, M.C. (2009). The deterrent effect of death penalty eligibility: Evidence from the adoption of child murder eligibility factors. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 451-497.
66. Katz, L., Levitt, S.D., and Shustorovich, E. (2003). Prison conditions, capital punishment, and deterrence. American Law and Economics Review, 5(2), 318-343.
67. Klick, J., and Tabarrok, A. (2005). Using terror alert levels to estimate the effect of police on crime. Journal of Law & Economics, 48(1), 267-279.
68. Kovandzic, T.V., Vieraitis, L.M., and Boots, D.P. (2009). Does the death penalty save lives? Criminology & Public Policy, 8(4), 803-843.
69. Lee, D., and McCrary, J. (2009). The Deterrent Effect of Prison: Dynamic Theory and Evidence. Unpublished paper. Industrial Relations Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University. Available: http://emlab.berkeley.edu/~jmccrary/lee_and_mccrary2009.pdf [December 2010].
70. Manski, C.F. (in press). Identification of treatment response with social interactions. Submitted to The Econometrics Journal. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2011.00368.x/abstract [December 2010].
71. Mocan, H.N., and Gittings, R.K. (2003). Getting off death row: Commuted sentences and the deterrent effect of capital punishment. Journal of Law & Economics, 46(2), 453-478.
72. Mocan, H.N., and Gittings, R.K. (2010). The impact of incentives on human behavior: Can we make it disappear? The case of the death penalty. In R.E.S. Di Tella and E. Schargrodsky (Eds.), The Economics of Crime: Lessons for and from Latin America (pp. 379-420). National Bureau of Economic Research conference report. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73. National Research Council. (1978). Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects ofCriminal Sanctions on Crime Rates. Panel on Research on Deterrent and Incapacitative Effects. A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, and D. Nagin (Eds.), Committee on Research on Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice. Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
74. Roman, J.K., Chalfin, A.J., and Knight, C.R. (2009). Reassessing the cost of the death penalty using quasi-experimental methods: Evidence from Maryland. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 530-574.
75. Rubin, D.B. (1986). Statistics and causal inference: Comment: Which ifs have causal answers. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 961-962.
76. Shepherd, J.M. (2005). Deterrence versus brutalization: Capital punishment's differing impacts among states. Michigan Law Review, 104(2), 203-255.
77. Snell, T.L. (2010). Capital Punishment, 2009-Statistical Tables. Report, U.S. Department of Justice (NCJ 231676). Available: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail& iid=2215. [December 2010].
78. Zimmerman, P.R. (2004). State executions, deterrence, and the incidence of murder. Journal of Applied Economics, 7(1), 163-193.
79. Ash, R.B., and Gardner, M.F. (1975). Topics in Stochastic Processes. New York: Academic Press.
80. Bailey, W.C. (1998). Deterrence, brutalization, and the death penalty: Another reexamination of Oklahoma's return to capital punishment. Criminology, 36(4), 711-733.
81. Becker, G.S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217.
82. Brennan, M. (2008). Capital asset pricing model. In S.N. Durlauf and L. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (revised ed., vol. 1, pp. 641-648). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
83. Charles, K.K., and Durlauf, S. (in press). Pitfalls in the use of time series methods to study deterrence and capital punishment. Submitted to Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28.
84. Cloninger, D.O. (1992). Capital punishment and deterrence: A portfolio approach. Applied Economics, 24(6), 635-645.
85. Cloninger, D.O., and Marchesini, R. (2001). Execution and deterrence: A quasi-controlled group experiment. Applied Economics, 33(5), 569-576.
86. Cloninger, D.O., and Marchesini, R. (2006). Execution moratoriums, commutations and deterrence: The case of Illinois. Applied Economics, 38(9), 967-973.
87. Cochran, J.K., Chamlin, M.B., and Seth, M. (1994). Deterrence or brutalization-An impact assessment of Oklahoma's return to capital-punishment. Criminology, 32(1), 107-134.
88. Donohue, J.J., and Wolfers, J. (2005). Uses and abuses of empirical evidence in the death penalty debate. Stanford Law Review, 58(3), 791-845.
89. Durlauf, S., and Nagin, D. (2011). The deterrent effect of imprisonment. In P.J. Cook, J. Ludwig, and J. McCrary (Eds.), Controlling Crime: Strategies and Tradeoffs (pp. 43-94). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
90. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2011). Uniform Crime Reports: Estimated Murder Rate in Texas 1960-2009. Available: http://www.ucrdatatools.gov [December 2011].
91. Granger, C.W.J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and crossspectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
92. Grogger, J. (1990). The deterrent effect of capital punishment: An analysis of daily homicide counts. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(410), 295-303.
93. Hjalmarsson, R. (2009). Does capital punishment have a "local" deterrent effect on homicides? American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 310-334.
94. Land, K.C., Teske, R.H.C., and Zheng, H. (2009). The short-term effects of executions on homicides: Deterrence, displacement, or both? Criminology, 47(4), 1,009-1,043.
95. Leeper, E.M., and Zha, T. (2003). Modest policy interventions. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(8), 1,673-1,700.
96. Leeper, E.M., Sims, C.A., and Zha, T. (1996). What does monetary policy do? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1996(2), 1-78.
97. Liebman, J., Fagan, J., and West, V. (2000). Capital attrition: Error rates in capital cases, 1973-1995. Texas Law Review, 78, 1,839-1,861.
98. Lucas, R. (1976). Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1, 19-46.
99. Marschak, J. (1953). Economic measurements for policy and prediction. In W.C. Hood and T.C. Koopmans (Eds.), Studies in Econometric Method (pp. 1-26). New Haven: Yale University Press.
100. Phillips, D.P. (1980). The deterrent effect of capital punishment: New evidence on an old controversy. American Journal of Sociology, 86(1), 138-148.
101. Phillips, D.P. (1982). The fluctuation of homicides after publicized executions: Reply. American Journal of Sociology, 88(1), 165-167.
102. Sims, C.A. (1972). Money, income, and causality. American Economic Review, 62(4), 540-552.
103. Sims, C.A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48.
104. Sims, C.A., Goldfeld, S.M., and Sachs, J.D. (1982). Policy analysis with econometric models. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1982(1), 107-164.
105. Stolzenberg, L., and D'Alessio, S.J. (2004). Capital punishment, execution publicity, and murder in Houston, Texas. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 94(2), 351-379.
106. Texas Department of Criminal Justice. (2011). Executed Offenders. Available: http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/death_row/dr_executed_offenders.html [December 2011].
107. Zeisel, H. (1982). The deterrent effect of capital-punishment-Comment. American Journal of Sociology, 88(1), 167-169.
108. Zimring, F.E., Fagan, J., and Johnson, D.T. (2010). Executions, deterrence, and homicide: A tale of two cities. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7(1), 1-29.
109. Alarcón, A.L., and Mitchell, P.M. (2011). Executing the will of the voters?: A roadmap to mend or end the California legislature's multi-billion-dollar death penalty debacle. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 44(Special), S41-S224.
110. Apel, R. (in press). Sanctions, perceptions, and crime: Implications for criminal deterrence. Submitted to Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28.
111. Bates, J.M., and Granger, C.W.J. (1969). The combination of forecasts. Operational Research Quarterly, 20(4), 451-468.
112. California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice. (2008). Report and Recommendations on the Administration of the Death Penalty in California. Sacramento: Author.
113. Carr-Hill, R.A., and Stern, N.H. (1979). Crime, the Police and Criminal Statistics: An Analysis of Official Statistics for England and Wales Using Econometric Methods. New York: Academic Press.
114. Chatfield, C. (1995). Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society, 158(3), 419-466.
115. Cohen-Cole, E., Durlauf, S., Fagan, J., and Nagin, D. (2009). Model uncertainty and the deterrent effect of capital punishment. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 335-369.
116. Cook, P.J. (2009). Potential savings from abolition of the death penalty in North Carolina. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 498-529.
117. Cook, P.J., Ludwig, J., and Braga, A.A. (2005). Criminal records of homicide offenders. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(5), 598-601.
118. Dezhbakhsh, H., and Rubin, P.H. (2011). From the "econometrics of capital punishment" to the "capital punishment" of econometrics: On the use and abuse of sensitivity analysis. Applied Economics, 43(25), 3,655-3,670.
119. Dezhbakhsh, H., Rubin, P.H., and Shepherd, J.M. (2003). Does capital punishment have a deterrent effect? New evidence from postmoratorium panel data. American Law and Economics Review, 5, 344-376.
120. Dominitz, J., and Manski, C.F. (1997). Perceptions of economic insecurity - evidence from the survey of economic expectations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(2), 261-287.
121. Donohue, J.J., and Wolfers, J. (2005). Uses and abuses of empirical evidence in the death penalty debate. Stanford Law Review, 58(3), 791-845.
122. Draper, D. (1995). Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Methodological, 57(1), 45-97.
123. Draper, D., Hodges, J.S., Mallows, C.L., and Pregibon, D. (1993). Exchangeability and dataanalysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society, 156(1), 9-37.
124. Durlauf, S., Fu, C., and Navarro, S. (in press). Capital punishment and deterrence: Understanding disparate results. Submitted to Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28.
125. Ehrlich, I. (1975). Deterrent effect of capital punishment-Question of life and death. American Economic Review, 65(3), 397-417.
126. Fischhoff, B., Parker, A.M., De Bruin, W.B., Downs, J., Palmgren, C., Dawes, R., and Manski, C.F. (2000). Teen expectations for significant life events. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(2), 189-205.
127. Hurd, M., and McGarry, K. (1995). Evaluation of the subjective probabilities of survival in the Health and Retirement Study. Journal of Human Resources, 30(5), S268-S292.
128. Hurd, M.D., and McGarry, K. (2002). The predictive validity of subjective probabilities of survival. The Economic Journal, 112(482), 966-985.
129. Hurd, M.D., Smith, J.P., and Zissimopoulos, J.M. (2004). The effects of subjective survival on retirement and social security claiming. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(6), 761-775.
130. Kuziemko, I. (2006). Does the threat of the death penalty affect plea bargaining in murder cases? Evidence from New York's 1995 reinstatement of capital punishment. American Law and Economics Review, 8(1), 116-142.
131. Leamer, E.E. (1978). Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Nonexperimental Data. New York: Wiley.
132. Lochner, L. (2007). Individual perceptions of the criminal justice system. American Economic Review, 97(1), 444-460.
133. Manski, C.F. (1989). Anatomy of the selection problem. Journal of Human Resources, 24(3), 343-360.
134. Manski, C.F. (1990). Nonparametric bounds on treatment effects. American Economic Review, 80(2), 319-323.
135. Manski, C.F. (2003). Partial Identification of Probability Distributions. New York: Springer.
136. Manski, C.F. (2004). Measuring expectations. Econometrica, 72(5), 1,329-1,376.
137. Manski, C.F., and Nagin, D.S. (1998). Bounding disagreements about treatment effects: A case study of sentencing and recidivism. Sociological Methodology, 28(1), 99-137.
138. Manski, C.F., and Pepper, J. (in press). Deterrence and the death penalty: Partial identification analysis using repeated cross sections. Submitted to Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28.
139. Manski, C.F., and Straub, J.D. (2000). Worker perceptions of job insecurity in the mid-1990s-Evidence from the survey of economic expectations. Journal of Human Resources, 35(3), 447-479.
140. Mocan, N., and Gittings, K. (2010). The impact of incentives on human behavior: Can we make it disappear? The case of the death penalty. In R.E.S. Di Tella and E. Schargrodsky (Eds.), The Economics of Crime: Lessons for and from Latin America (pp. 379-420). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
141. Mulvey, E.P. (2011). Highlights from Pathways to Desistance: A Longitudinal Study of Serious Adolescent Offenders. Juvenile Justice Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
142. National Research Council. (1978). Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates. Panel on Research on Deterrent and Incapacitative Effects. A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, and D. Nagin (Eds.), Committee on Research on Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice. Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
143. National Research Council. (1986). Criminal Careers and "Career Criminals." Panel on Research on Criminal Careers, A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J.A. Roth, and C.A. Visher (Eds.), Committee on Research on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
144. Raftery, A.E., Madigan, D., and Hoeting, J.A. (1997). Bayesian model averaging for linear regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(437), 179-191.
145. Roman, J.K., Chalfin, A.J., and Knight, C.R. (2009). Reassessing the cost of the death penalty using quasi-experimental methods: Evidence from Maryland. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 530-574.
146. Sjoquist, D.L. (1973). Property crime and economic behavior: Some empirical results. American Economic Review, 63(3), 439-446.
147. West, D.J., and Farrington, D.P. (1973). Who Becomes Delinquent? Second Report of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. London: Heinemann Educational.
148. Wolfgang, M.E. (1958). Patterns in Criminal Homicide. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.