Taxonomy for colorectal cancer screening promotion: Lessons from recent randomized controlled trials

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 101, Issue , 2017, Pages 229-234

  Ritvo, Paul ^a,b   Myers, Ronald E ^c   Serenity, Mardie ^d   Gupta, Samir ^e   Inadomi, John M ^f   Green, Beverly B ^g   Jerant, Anthony ^h   Tinmouth, Jill ^d   Paszat, Lawrence ^i,j   Pirbaglou, Meysam ^a   Rabeneck, Linda ^k  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^e VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^j INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EVALUATIVE SCIENCES   (Canada)

^k CANCER CARE ONTARIO   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Cancer prevention; Clinical trials; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal cancer screening; Health service research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; ETHNICITY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MINORITY GROUP; OCCULT BLOOD TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TASK PERFORMANCE; TAXONOMY; CLASSIFICATION; COLORECTAL TUMOR; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; MALE; MASS SCREENING; OCCULT BLOOD; PROCEDURES;

CLASSIFICATION; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; OCCULT BLOOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85014106697     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: 10960260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.12.024     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Benson, V.S., Atkin, W.S., Green, J., Nadel, M.R., Patnick, J., Smith, R.A., Villain, P., International Colorectal Cancer Screening Network. Toward standardizing and reporting colorectal cancer screening indicators on an international level: The International Colorectal Cancer Screening Network. Int. J. Cancer 130:12 (2012 Jun 15), 2961–2973, 10.1002/ijc.26310 (Epub 2011 Aug 30).
2. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3:2 (2006), 77–101, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
3. Cancer Care Ontario, colorectal cancer screening: screening recommendations. URL: https://www.cancercare.on.ca/pcs/screening/coloscreening/?WT.mc_id=/colorectalscreening, 2016 (accessed 2017-01-02).
4. Green, B.B., Wang, C.Y., Anderson, M.L., Chubak, J., Meenan, R.T., Vernon, S.W., et al. An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 158:5 Pt 1 (2013 Mar 5), 301–311.
5. Guest, G., MacQueen, K.N.E., Applied Thematic Analysis. 2012, Sage Publications.
6. Gupta, S., Personal communication, 2013.
7. Gupta, S., Halm, E.A., Rockey, D.C., Hammons, M., Koch, M., Carter, E., et al. Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual Care for Boosting Colorectal Cancer Screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern. Med., 5, 2013 Aug.
8. Hill, C.L., LaValley, M.P., Felson, D.T., Discrepancy between published report and actual conduct of randomized clinical trials. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 55:8 (2002 Aug), 783–786.
9. Inadomi, J., Personal communication, 2012.
10. Inadomi, J.M., Vijan, S., Janz, N.K., Fagerlin, A., Thomas, J.P., Lin, Y.V., Muñoz, R., Lau, C., Somsouk, M., El-Nachef, N., Hayward, R.A., Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies. Arch. Intern. Med. 172:7 (2012 Apr 9), 575–582, 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.332.
11. Jerant, A., Kravitz, R.L., Sohler, N., Fiscella, K., Romero, R.L., Parnes, B., Tancredi, D.J., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Slee, C., Dvorak, S., Turner, C., Hudnut, A., Prieto, F., Franks, P., Sociopsychological tailoring to address colorectal cancer screening disparities: a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Fam. Med. 12:3 (2014 May), 204–214 (–Jun).
12. Kirmayer, L.J., Rethinking cultural competence. Transcult. Psychiatry 49:2 (2012), 149–164.
13. Moher, D., Pham, B., Jones, A., Cook, D.J., Jadad, A.R., Moher, M., Tugwell, P., Klassen, T.P., Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet 352:9128 (1998 Aug 22), 609–613.
14. Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K.F., Montori, V., Gøtzsche, P.C., Devereaux, P.J., Elbourne, D., Egger, M., Altman, D.G., Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Group. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials. Int. J. Surg. 10:1 (2012), 28–55, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001.
15. Myers, R.E., Bittner-Fagan, H., Daskalakis, C., Sifri, R., Vernon, S.W., Cocroft, J., et al. A randomized controlled trial of a tailored navigation and a standard intervention in colorectalcancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 22:1 (2013 Jan), 109–117.
16. Ritvo, P., Myers, R.E., Paszat, L.F., Tinmouth, J.M., McColeman, J., Mitchell, B., Serenity, M., Rabeneck, L., Personal navigation increases colorectal cancer screening uptake. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 2015 Nov 6 (pii: cebp.0744.2014 [Epub ahead of print]) http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.1623.
17. Swan, H., Siddiqui, A.A., Myers, R.E., International Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs: Population Contact Strategies, Testing Methods and Screening Rates Practical Gastroenterology. 2012 Aug (Practical Approaches to the Diagnosis and eatment of Colorectal Cancer #).
18. Toerien, M., Brookes, S.T., Metcalfe, C., de Salis, I., Tomlin, Z., Peters, T.J., Sterne, J., Donovan, J.L., A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals. Trials, 10(10), 2009 Jul, 52, 10.1186/1745-6215-10-52.