On the analysis of intrahost and interhost viral populations: Human cytomegalovirus as a case study of pitfalls and expectations

Journal of Virology

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2017, Pages

  Renzette, Nicholas ^a   Pfeifer, Susanne P ^b,c   Matuszewski, Sebastian ^b   Kowalik, Timothy F ^a   Jensen, Jeffrey D ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Human cytomegalovirus; Interhost diversity; Intrahost diversity; Population genetics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; HUMAN CYTOMEGALOVIRUS; INTERHOST VIRAL POPULATION; INTRAHOST VIRAL POPULATION; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MODEL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; POPULATION GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; VIRAL DIVERSITY; VIRUS CELL INTERACTION; VIRUS LOAD; VIRUS MUTATION; ALLELE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CYTOMEGALOVIRUS; CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS; HUMAN; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; VIROLOGY; VIRUS GENE;

ALLELES; CYTOMEGALOVIRUS; CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTIONS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE FREQUENCY; GENES, VIRAL; GENETIC FITNESS; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC;

EID: 85013988114     PISSN: 0022538X     EISSN: 10985514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01976-16     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Sijmons S, Thys K, Mbong Ngwese M, Van Damme E, Dvorak J, Van Loock M, Li G, Tachezy R, Busson L, Aerssens J, Van Ranst M, Maes P. 2015. High-throughput analysis of human cytomegalovirus genome diversity highlights the widespread occurrence of gene-disrupting mutations and pervasive recombination. J Virol 89:7673-7695. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00578-15.
2. Holmes EC. 2003. Patterns of intra-and interhost nonsynonymous variation reveal strong purifying selection in Dengue virus. J Virol 77: 11296-11298. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.77.20.11296-11298.2003.
3. Kimura M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217: 624-626. https://doi.org/10.1038/217624a0.
4. Ohta T. 1973. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature 246:96-98. https://doi.org/10.1038/246096a0.
5. Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis. Genetics 123:437-460.
6. Fay J, Wu C-I. 2000. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics 155:1405-1413.
7. Renzette N, Gibson L, Jensen JD, Kowalik TF. 2014. Human cytomegalovirus intrahost evolution-a new avenue for understanding and controlling herpesvirus infections. Curr Opin Virol 8:109-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2014.08.001.
8. Maynard Smith J, Haigh J. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favorable gene. Genet Res 23:23-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300014634.
9. Charlesworth B, Morgan MT, Charlesworth D. 1993. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134: 1289-1303.
10. Renzette N, Kowalik TF, Jensen JD. 2016. On the relative roles of background selection and genetic hitchhiking in shaping human cytomegalovirus genetic diversity. Mol Ecol 25:403-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13331.
11. Renzette N, Gibson L, Bhattacharjee B, Fisher D, Schleiss MR, Jensen JD, Kowalik TF. 2013. Rapid intrahost evolution of human cytomegalovirus is shaped by demography and positive selection. PLoS Genet 9:e1003735. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003735.
12. Renzette N, Bhattacharjee B, Jensen JD, Gibson L, Kowalik TF. 2011. Extensive genome-wide variability of human cytomegalovirus in congenitally infected infants. PLoS Pathog 7:e1001344. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001344.
13. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD. 2009. Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change. Mol Biol Evol 26:2097-2108. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp119.
14. Renzette N, Pokalyuk C, Gibson L, Bhattacharjee B, Schleiss MR, Hamprecht K, Yamamoto AY, Mussi-Pinhata MM, Britt WJ, Jensen JD, Kowalik TF. 2015. Limits and patterns of cytomegalovirus genomic diversity in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E4120-E4128. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501880112.
15. Gillespie JH. 1999. The role of population size in molecular evolution. Theor Popul Biol 55:145-156. https://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.1998.1391.
16. Jensen JD, Bachtrog D. 2011. Characterizing the influence of effective population size on the rate of adaptation: Gillespie's Darwin domain. Genome Biol Ecol 3:687-701. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evr063.
17. Foll M, Shim H, Jensen JD. 2015. WFABC: a Wright-Fisher ABC-based approach for inferring effective population sizes and selection coefficients from time-sampled data. Mol Ecol Resour 15:87-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12280.
18. Kimura M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
19. Ewing GB, Jensen JD. 2016. The consequences of not accounting for background selection in demographic inference. Mol Ecol 25:135-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13390.
20. Foll M, Poh Y-P, Renzette N, Ferrer-Admetlla A, Shim H, Malaspinas A-S, Ewing G, Bank C, Liu P, Wegmann D, Caffrey DR, Zeldovich KB, Bolon DN, Wang J, Kowalik TF, Schiffer CA, Finberg RW, Jensen JD. 2014. Influenza virus drug resistance: a time-sampled population genetics perspective. PLoS Genet 10:e1004185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004185.
21. Shim H, Laurent S, Matuszewski S, Foll M, Jensen JD. 2016. Detecting and quantifying changing selection intensities from time-sampled polymorphism data. G3 6:893-904. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.115.023200.
22. Eyre-Walker A, Woolfit M, Phelps T. 2006. The distribution of fitness effects of new deleterious amino acid mutations in humans. Genetics 173:891-900. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.057570.
23. Hernandez R. 2008. A flexible forward simulator for populations subject to selection and demography. Bioinformatics 24:2786-2787. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn522.