SOFA and mortality endpoints in randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis

Critical Care

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  de Grooth, Harm Jan ^a   Geenen, Irma L ^a   Girbes, Armand R ^a   Vincent, Jean Louis ^b   Parienti, Jean Jacques ^c,d   Oudemans van Straaten, Heleen M ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ERASME HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

Author keywords

Critical care trials; Multiple organ failure; Sepsis; Surrogate endpoints

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROL GROUP; DELTA SEQUENTIAL ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT SCORE; FIXED DAY SEQUENTIAL ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT SCORE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SEQUENTIAL ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT SCORE; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; ORGAN DYSFUNCTION SCORE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; TRENDS; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; ORGAN DYSFUNCTION SCORES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85013822330     PISSN: 13648535     EISSN: 1466609X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1609-1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707-10.
2. Moreno R, Vincent JL, Matos R, Mendonça A, Cantraine F, Thijs L, et al. The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:686-96.
3. Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent JL. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2001;286:1754-8.
4. Minne L, Abu-Hanna A, de Jonge E. Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2008;12:R161.
5. Rubenfeld GD. Surrogate Measures of Patient-centered Outcomes in Critical Care. In: Angus DC, Carlet J, editors. Surviv. Intensive Care. Berlin: Springer; 2003. p. 169-80.
6. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline: Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials E9. 1998.
7. Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:605-13.
8. Kassaï B, Shah NR, Leizorovicza A, Cucherat M, Gueyffier F, Boissel J-P. The true treatment benefit is unpredictable in clinical trials using surrogate outcome measured with diagnostic tests. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:1042-51.
9. de Grooth HJ, Parienti JJ, Oudemans-van Straaten HM. PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews. Record CRD42016034014 [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42016034014.â Accessed 18 Feb 2016.
10. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1-12.
11. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557-60.
12. Hommel G. A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika. 1988;75:383-6.
13. Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor Package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36:1-48.
14. Peres Bota D, Melot C, Lopes Ferreira F, Nguyen Ba V, Vincent J-L. The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) versus the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in outcome prediction. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1619-24.
15. Timsit J-F, Fosse J-P, Troché G, De Lassence A, Alberti C, Garrouste-Orgeas M, et al. Calibration and discrimination by daily Logistic Organ Dysfunction scoring comparatively with daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring for predicting hospital mortality in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:2003-13.
16. Pettilä V, Pettilä M, Sarna S, Voutilainen P, Takkunen O. Comparison of multiple organ dysfunction scores in the prediction of hospital mortality in the critically ill. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1705-11.
17. Junger A, Engel J, Benson M, Böttger S, Grabow C, Hartmann B, et al. Discriminative power on mortality of a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for complete automatic computation in an operative intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:338-42.
18. Vincent J-L. Endpoints in sepsis trials: more than just 28-day mortality? Crit Care Med. 2004;32:S209-13.
19. Petros AJ, Marshall JC, van Saene HK. Should morbidity replace mortality as an endpoint for clinical trials in intensive care? Lancet (London, England). 1995;345:369-71. 345.
20. Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH. Validating surrogate endpoints. Mach. Learn. Med. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2013. p. 53-64.
21. Freedman LS, Graubard BI, Schatzkin A. Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases. Stat Med. 1992;11:167-78.
22. Chen LM, Martin CM, Morrison TL, Sibbald WJ. Interobserver variability in data collection of the APACHE II score in teaching and community hospitals. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1999-2004.
23. Arts DGT, de Keizer NF, Vroom MB, de Jonge E. Reliability and accuracy of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:1988-93.
24. Baykara N, Gökduman K, Hoşten T, Solak M, Toker K. Comparison of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring between nurses and residents. J Anesth. 2011;25:839-44.