Comparison of multi-criteria decision support methods for integrated rehabilitation prioritization

Water (Switzerland)

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2017, Pages

  Tscheikner Gratl, Franz ^a   Egger, Patrick ^a   Rauch, Wolfgang ^a   Kleidorfer, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

AHP; Asset management; Decision support; ELECTRE; Multi utility rehabilitation; PROMETHEE; TOPSIS; Urban water infrastructure; WSM

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ASSET MANAGEMENT; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; SCALES (WEIGHING INSTRUMENTS); WATER MANAGEMENT;

DECISION SUPPORTS; ELECTRE; PROMETHEE; TOPSIS; URBAN WATERS;

DECISION MAKING;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; FUTURE PROSPECT; INFRASTRUCTURE; INTEGRATED APPROACH; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; PRIORITIZATION; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN PLANNING; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PLANNING; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 85013761735     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/w9020068     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. European Committee for Standardization. European Standard EN 752. Drain and Sewer Systems Outside Buildings; ICS 93.030; Comite Europeen de Normalisation (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
2. European Committee for Standardization. European Standard EN 805. Water Supply-Requirements for Systems and Components Outside Buildings; ICS 23.040.01; Comite Europeen de Normalisation (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
3. Casillas, M.; Garza-Castañón, L.; Puig, V. Optimal Sensor Placement for Leak Location in Water Distribution Networks using Evolutionary Algorithms. Water 2015, 7, 6496-6515.
4. Sörensen, J.; Persson, A.; Sternudd, C.; Aspegren, H.; Nilsson, J.; Nordström, J.; Jönsson, K.; Mottaghi, M.; Becker, P.; Pilesjö, P.; et al. Re-Thinking Urban Flood Management-Time for a Regime Shift. Water 2016, 8, 332.
5. Sægrov, S. (Ed.) Care-W: Computer Aided Rehabilitation of Water Networks; IWA Publishing: London, UK, 2005.
6. Sægrov, S. (Ed.) Care-S: Computer Aided Rehabilitation of Sewer and Stormwater Networks; IWA Publishing: London, UK, 2006.
7. Yoo, D.; Kang, D.; Jun, H.; Kim, J. Rehabilitation Priority Determination of Water Pipes Based on Hydraulic Importance. Water 2014, 6, 3864-3887.
8. Osman, H. Coordination of urban infrastructure reconstruction projects. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2015, 12, 108-121.
9. Tscheikner-Gratl, F.; Sitzenfrei, R.; Rauch, W.; Kleidorfer, M. Integrated rehabilitation planning of urban infrastructure systems using a street section priority model. Urban Water J. 2016, 13, 28-40.
10. Tscheikner-Gratl, F.; Sitzenfrei, R.; Stibernitz, C.; Rauch, W.; Kleidorfer, M. Integrated rehabilitation management by prioritization of rehabilitation areas for small and medium sized municipalities. In Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015: Floods, Droughts, and Ecosytems, Austin, TX, USA, 17-21 May 2015; Karvazy, K., Webster, V.L., Eds.; ASCE: Reston, VA, USA, 2015; pp. 2045-2057.
11. Zavadskas, E.K.; Turskis, Z.; Kildiene, S. State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2014, 20, 165-179.
12. Huang, I.B.; Keisler, J.; Linkov, I. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 3578-3594.
13. Belton, V.; Stewart, T.J. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2002.
14. Løken, E. Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 1584-1595.
15. Tscheikner-Gratl, F. Integrated Approach for Multi-Utility Rehabilitation Planning of Urban Water Infrastructure: Focus on Small and Medium Sized Municipalities. Ph. D. Thesis, University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria, 2016.
16. Kabir, G.; Sadiq, R.; Tesfamariam, S. A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2014, 10, 1176-1210.
17. Mardani, A.; Jusoh, A.; MD Nor, K.; Khalifah, Z.; Zakwan, N.; Valipour, A. Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications-A review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraž. 2015, 28, 516-571.
18. Brownlee, T.J.; Finnie, S.; Wightman, D. Identification of potential highways maintenance schemes. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Transp. 2007, 160, 139-146.
19. Tzeng, G.-H.; Huang, J.-J. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Appliations; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011.
20. Saaty, T.L. Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process; Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1988.
21. Macharis, C.; Springael, J.; de Brucker, K.; Verbeke, A. PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 153, 307-317.
22. Al-Barqawi, H.; Zayed, T. Infrastructure Management: Integrated AHP/ANN Model to Evaluate Municipal Water Mains' Performance. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2008, 14, 305-318.
23. Birgani, Y.T.; Yazdandoost, F.; Dehlavi, E. Integrated Approach in Spatial Priority of Urban Areas for Implementation of Urban Drainage Plans Using Analytic Hierarchy Process and GIS for 22nd Municipal District of Tehran, Iran. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Sarawak, Malaysia, 7-12 September 2014.
24. Sabzi, H.Z.; King, J.P. Numerical Comparison of Multi-criteria Decision-making Techniques: A Simulation on Flood Management Multi-criteria Systems. In Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015: Floods, Droughts, and Ecosytems, Austin, TX, USA, 17-21 May 2015; Karvazy, K., Webster, V.L., Eds.; ASCE: Reston, VA, USA, 2015.
25. Lee, J.H.; Baek, C.W.; Kim, J.H.; Jun, H.D.; Jo, D.J. Development of a Decision Making Support System for Efficient Rehabilitation of Sewer Systems. Water Resour. Manag. 2009, 23, 1725-1742.
26. Young, K.D.; Younos, T.; Dymond, R.L.; Kibler, D.F.; Lee, D.H. Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Selecting and Modeling Stormwater Best Management Practices. J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ. 2010, 146, 50-63.
27. Feizizadeh, B.; Jankowski, P.; Blaschke, T. A Spatially Explicit Approach for Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of GIS-Multicriteria Landslide Susceptibility Mapping. In GI_Forum 2013-Creating the GISociety; Jekel, T., Car, A., Strobl, J., Griesebner, G., Eds.; öAW Verlag: Vienna, Austria, 2013; pp. 157-164.
28. Feizizadeh, B.; Omrani, K.; Aghdam, F.B. Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process and Spatially Explicit Uncertainty Analysis Approach for Multiple Forest Fire Risk Mapping. GI-Forum 2015, 1, 72-80.
29. Benayoun, R.; Roy, B.; Sussman, N. Manual de Reference du Programme Electre; SEMA: Paris, France, 1966.
30. Mardani, A.; Jusoh, A.; Zavadskas, E.K. Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications-Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015, 42, 4126-4148.
31. Govindan, K.; Jepsen, M.B. ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2016, 250, 1-29.
32. Baur, R.; Herz, R.; Kropp, I. WP6-Multi-Criteria Decision Support: WP6 Conclusive Report; CARE-S Computer Aided REhabilitation of Sewer networks: Dresden, Germany, 2005.
33. Carrico, N.; Covas, D.I.C.; Almeida, M.C.; Leitao, J.P.; Alegre, H. Prioritization of rehabilitation interventions for urban water assets using multiple criteria decision-aid methods. Water Sci. Technol. J. Int. Assoc. Water Pollut. Res. 2012, 66, 1007-1014.
34. Moura, P.M.; Baptista, M.B.; Barraud, S. Comparison between two methodologies for urban drainage decision aid. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54, 493.
35. Martin, C.; Ruperd, Y.; Legret, M. Urban stormwater drainage management: The development of a multicriteria decision aid approach for best management practices. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 181, 338-349.
36. Haider, H.; Sadiq, R.; Tesfamariam, S. Selecting performance indicators for small and medium sized water utilities: Multi-criteria analysis using ELECTRE method. Urban Water J. 2013, 12, 305-327.
37. Morais, D.C.; Almeida, A.T. Water supply system decision making using multicriteria analysis. Water SA 2007, 32, 229-236.
38. Le Gauffre, P.; Haidar, H.; Poinard, D.; Laffréchine, K.; Baur, R.; Schiatti, M. A Multicriteria Decision Support Methodology for Annual Rehabilitation Programs of Water Networks. Comput.-Aided Civ. Eng. 2007, 22, 478-488.
39. Trojan, F.; Morais, D.C. Prioritising alternatives for maintenance of water distribution networks: A group decision approach. Water SA 2012, 38.
40. Buchanan, J.; Vanderpooten, D. Ranking projects for an electricity utility using ELECTRE III. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2007, 14, 309-323.
41. Pires, A.; Chang, N.-B.; Martinho, G. An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setúbal Peninsula, Portugal. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 56, 7-21.
42. Brans, J.-P.; Mareschal, B. The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid. Decis. Support Syst. 1994, 12, 297-310.
43. Behzadian, M.; Kazemzadeh, R.B.; Albadvi, A.; Aghdasi, M. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 200, 198-215.
44. Brans, J.P. L'ingénièrie de la décision; Elaboration d'instruments d'aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE. In L'aide à la Décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d'Avenir; Nadeau, R., Landry, M., Eds.; Presses de l'Université Laval: Ville de Québec, QC, Canada, 1982; pp. 183-213.
45. Brans, J.P.; Vincke, P. A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making). Manag. Sci. 1985, 31, 647-656.
46. Gervásio, H.; Simões da Silva, L. A probabilistic decision-making approach for the sustainable assessment of infrastructures. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 7121-7131.
47. Churchman, C.W.; Ackoff, R.L.; Smith, N.M. An Approximate Measure of Value. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Am. 1954, 2, 172-187.
48. Tscheikner-Gratl, F.; Sitzenfrei, R.; Hammerer, M.; Rauch, W.; Kleidorfer, M. Prioritization of Rehabilitation Areas for Urban Water Infrastructure. A Case Study. Procedia Eng. 2014, 89, 811-816.
49. Kolios, A.; Mytilinou, V.; Lozano-Minguez, E.; Salonitis, K. A Comparative Study of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods under Stochastic Inputs. Energies 2016, 9, 566.
50. Coutinho-Rodrigues, J.; Simão, A.; Antunes, C.H. A GIS-based multicriteria spatial decision support system for planning urban infrastructures. Decis. Support Syst. 2011, 51, 720-726.
51. Ochs, C.-P. Multikriterielle Optimierung der Sanierungsplanung von Entwässerungsnetzen. Ph. D. Thesis, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany, 2012.
52. Triantaphyllou, E.; Sánchez, A. A Sensitivity Analysis Approach for Some Deterministic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods. Decis. Sci. 1997, 28, 151-194.
53. Hwang, C.L.; Yoon, K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1981.
54. Behzadian, M.; Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, S.; Yazdani, M.; Ignatius, J. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 13051-13069.
55. Rao, R.V. Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment: Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods; Springer: London, UK, 2007.
56. Alegre, H.; Coelho, S.T. Infrastructure Asset Management of UrbanWater Systems. In Water Supply System Analysis-Selected Topics; Ostfeld, A., Ed.; Intech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 49-73.
57. Baker, D.; Bridge, D.; Hunter, R.; Johnon, G.; Krupa, J.; Murphy, J.; Sorenson, K. Guidebook to Decision Making Methods; United States Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
58. Van Riel, W.; van Bueren, E.; Langeveld, J.; Herder, P.; Clemens, F. Decision-making for sewer asset management: Theory and practice. Urban Water J. 2015, 13, 57-68.
59. Van Riel, W.; Langeveld, J.G.; Herder, P.M.; Clemens, F. Intuition and information in decision-making for sewer asset management. Urban Water J. 2013, 11, 506-518.
60. Tscheikner-Gratl, F.; Sitzenfrei, R.; Rauch, W.; Kleidorfer, M. Enhancement of limited water supply network data for deterioration modelling and determination of rehabilitation rate. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2016, 12, 366-380.
61. österreichischer Wasser-und Abfallwirtschaftsverband. öWAV-Regelblatt 40/öVGW Richtlinie W 104: Leitungsinformationssystem;Wasser und Abwasser: Vienna, Austria, 2010.
62. Deutsche Vereinigung fürWasserwirtschaft. DWA-Merkblatt DWA-M 149-3. DWA-M 149-3: Zustandserfassung und-Beurteilung von Entwässerungssystemen außerhalb von Gebäuden-Teil 3: Zustandsklassifizierung und-Bewertung; Abwasser und Abfall e. V.: Hennef, Germany, 2007.
63. Ariaratnam, S.T.; El-Assaly, A.; Yang, Y. Assessment of Infrastructure Inspection Needs Using Logistic Models. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2001, 7, 160-165.
64. Ahmadi, M.; Cherqui, F.; de Massiac, J.-C.; Le Gauffre, P. Influence of available data on sewer inspection program efficiency. Urban Water J. 2013, 11, 641-656.
65. Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung. Arbeitshilfen Abwasser-Planung, Bau und Betrieb von abwassertechnischen Anlagen in Liegenschaften des Bundes. 2015. Available online: http://www.arbeitshilfen-abwasser.de/html/index.html (accessed on 24 October 2016).
66. Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e. V. Arbeitsblatt DWA-A 118: Hydraulische Bemessung und Nachweis von Entwässerungssystemen; DWA: Hennef, Germany, 2006.
67. Wolf, M.; Braunschmidt, S.; Rabe, T.; Sympher, K.J. KANSAS Verbundvorhaben-Entwicklung Einer Ganzheitlichen Kanalsanierungsstrategie für Stadtentwässerungsnetze Deutschlands; Leitfaden: München, Germany, 2005.
68. Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser (LAWA). Leitlinien zur Durchführung Dynamischer Kostenvergleichsrechnungen (KVR-Leitlinien), 8th ed.; DWA: Hennef, Germany, 2012.
69. Mareschal, B. Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1988, 33, 54-64.
70. Tscheikner-Gratl, F.; Sitzenfrei, R.; Kohl, B.; Pümpel, T.; Klebinder, K.; Ebner, C.; Leonhartsberger, C.; Knapp, A.; Rauch, W. An Integrated Approach to Identify the Most Efficient Solutions for the Landfill Leachate Problem. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2016; Pathak, C.S., Reinhart, D., Eds.; ASCE Press: Reston, VA, USA, 2016; pp. 11-22.
71. Huang, J.-J.; Tzeng, G.-H.; Liu, H.-H. A Revised VIKOR Model for Multiple Criteria Decision Making-The Perspective of Regret Theory. In Cutting-Edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making; Shi, Y., Wang, S., Peng, Y., Li, J., Zeng, Y., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 761-768.
72. Cheng, S.; Chan, C.W.; Huang, G.H. Using multiple criteria decision analysis for supporting decisions of solid waste management. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 2002, 37, 975-990.
73. Osman, H.; Bainbridge, K. Comparison of Statistical Deterioration Models for Water Distribution Networks. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 2011, 25, 259-266.