Does preputial reconstruction increase complication rate of hypospadias repair? 20-year systematic review and meta-analysis

Frontiers in Pediatrics

Volumn 4, Issue APR, 2016, Pages

  Castagnetti, Marco ^a   Gnech, Michele ^a   Angelini, Lorenzo ^a   Rigamonti, Waifro ^b   Bagnara, Vincenzo ^c   Esposito, Ciro ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTE FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH IRCCS BURLO GAROFOLO   (Italy)

^c Morgagni Foundation   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Complication; Dehiscence; Hypospadias; Phimosis; Preputial reconstructrion

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013713325     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22962360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2016.00041     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Heloury Y, Cheng EY. Distal hypospadias: circumcision vs preputial reconstruction. J Urol (2014) 191:17-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.030
2. Hayashi Y, Kojima Y, Mizuno K, Maruyama T, Tozawa K, Kohri K. Modified foreskin reconstruction for distal hypospadias and chordee without hypospadias. Int J Urol (2008) 15:646-8. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02069.x
3. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med (2009) 151(4):264-9. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
4. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Greenhalgh T, Heneghan C, Liberati A, et al. Explanation of the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence (Background Document). OCEBM Website. Available from: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653
5. Erdenetsetseg G, Dewan PA. Reconstruction of the hypospadiac hooded prepuce. J Urol (2003) 169:1822-4. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000062320.34774.09
6. Zimmermann EF, Woodward MN. Isolated preputial reconstruction in distal hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol (2014) 10:399.e1-2. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.10.022
7. Klijn AJ, Dik P, de Jong TP. Results of preputial reconstruction in 77 boys with distal hypospadias. J Urol (2001) 165:1255-7. doi:10.1097/00005392-200104000-00062
8. Cimador M, Castagnetti M, De Grazia E. Risks and relevance of preputial reconstruction in hypospadia repair. Pediatr Med Chir (2003) 25:269-72. doi:10.4081/pmc.2003.41
9. Gray J, Boston VE. Glanular reconstruction and preputioplasty repair for distal hypospadias: a unique day-case method to avoid urethral stenting and preserve the prepuce. BJU Int (2003) 91:268-70. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.03087.x
10. Leclair MD, Camby C, Battisti S, Renaud G, Plattner V, Heloury Y. Unstented tubularized incised plate urethroplasty combined with foreskin reconstruction for distal hypospadias. Eur Urol (2004) 46:526-30. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2004.04.021
11. Antao B, Lansdale N, Roberts J, Mackinnon E. Factors affecting the outcome of foreskin reconstruction in hypospadias surgery. J Pediatr Urol (2007) 3:127-31. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.06.003
12. Papouis G, Kaselas C, Skoumis K, Kaselas V. Repair of distal hypospadias and preputioplasty in one operation. Risks and advantages. Urol Int (2009) 82:183-6. doi:10.1159/000200797
13. Bhatti AZ, Naveed M, Adeniran A, Ingelfield CJ. Preputial reconstruction with distal hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol (2007) 3:132-4. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.06.012
14. Shimada K, Matsumoto F, Matsui F, Takano S. Prepuce-sparing hypospadias repair with tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. Int J Urol (2008) 15:720-3. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02089.x
15. Suoub M, Dave S, El-Hout Y, Braga LH, Farhat WA. Distal hypospadias repair with or without foreskin reconstruction: a single-surgeon experience. J Pediatr Urol (2008) 4:377-80. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.01.215
16. Korvald C, Stubberud K. High odds for freedom from early complications after tubularized incised-plate urethroplasty in 1-year-old versus 5-year-old boys. J Pediatr Urol (2008) 4:452-6. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.07.001
17. Bhat A, Gandhi A, Saxena G, Choudhary GR. Preputial reconstruction and tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in proximal hypospadias with ventral penile curvature. Indian J Urol (2010) 26:507-10. doi:10.4103/0970-1591.74442
18. Fasching G, Arneitz C, Gritsch-Olipp G. Foreskin reconstruction and preservation of a thin distal urethra: a challenge in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. Pediatr Surg Int (2011) 27:755-60. doi:10.1007/s00383-011-2891-7
19. Moslemi MK, Gilani MA, Shahrokh H. Mathieu repair of distal and midshaft hypospadias: risks and benefits of foreskin reconstruction versus circumcision. Open Access J Urol (2011) 3:105-8. doi:10.2147/OAJU.S21577
20. ElGanainy EO, Hameed DA, Abdelsalam YM, Abdelaziz MA. Prepuce preserving versus conventional Mathieu urethroplasty for distal hypospadias-a prospective randomized study. J Pediatr Urol (2012) 8:264-7. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.05.004
21. Kallampallil J, Hennayake S. Foreskin retractility following hypospadias repair with preputioplasty-medium term outcomes. J Pediatr Urol (2013) 9:1204-9. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.05.022
22. Snodgrass W, Dajusta D, Villanueva C, Bush N. Foreskin reconstruction does not increase urethroplasty or skin complications after distal TIP hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol (2013) 9:401-6. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.06.008
23. Esposito C, Savanelli A, Escolino M, Giurin I, Iaquinto M, Alicchio F, et al. Preputioplasty associated with urethroplasty for correction of distal hypospadias: a prospective study and proposition of a new objective scoring system for evaluation of esthetic and functional outcome. J Pediatr Urol (2014) 10:294-9. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.09.003
24. Lorenzo AJ, Pippi Salle JL, Zlateska B, Koyle MA, Bägli DJ, Braga LH. Decisional regret after distal hypospadias repair: single institution prospective analysis of factors associated with subsequent parental remorse or distress. J Urol (2014) 191:1558-63. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.036
25. Ghidini F, Sekulovic S, Castagnetti M. Parental decisional regret after primary distal hypospadias repair: influence of family variables, surgery variables, and the outcomes of the repair. J Urol (2016) 195(3):720-4. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.118
26. Mureau MA, Slijper FM, Slob AK, Verhulst FC, Nijman RJ. Satisfaction with penile appearance after hypospadias surgery: the patient and surgeon view. J Urol (1996) 155:703-6. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66504-2
27. örtqvist L, Fossum M, Andersson M, Nordenström A, Frisén L, Holmdahl G, et al. Long-term followup of men born with hypospadias: urological and cosmetic results. J Urol (2015) 193:975-81. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.103
28. Weber DM, Landolt MA, Gobet R, Kalisch M, Greeff NK. The Penile Perception Score: an instrument enabling evaluation by surgeons and patient self-assessment after hypospadias repair. J Urol (2013) 189:189-93. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.178
29. van der Toorn F, de Jong TP, de Gier RP, Callewaert PR, van der Horst EH, Steffens MG, et al. Introducing the HOPE (hypospadias objective penile evaluation)-score: a validation study of an objective scoring system for evaluating cosmetic appearance in hypospadias patients. J Pediatr Urol (2013) 9:1006-16. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.01.015