Mathieu repair of distal and midshaft hypospadias: Risks and benefits of foreskin reconstruction versus circumcision

Open Access Journal of Urology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 105-108

  Moslemi, Mohammad Kazem ^a   Gilani, Mohammad Ali Sadighi ^b   Shahrokh, Hossein ^c  

^a University of Medical Science   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Circumcision; Distal; Hypospadias; Mathieu repair; Midshaft; Preputioplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CHORDEE; CIRCUMCISION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPOSPADIAS; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM DISEASE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM SURGERY; MATHIEU REPAIR; MEATAL STENOSIS; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHIMOSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREPUCE; PREPUTIOPLASTY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RELIGION; REPEAT PROCEDURE; SCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL STATUS; SURGICAL RISK; TISSUE PRESERVATION; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETHRA DEHISCENCE; URETHRA DISEASE; URETHRA FISTULA; URETHROPLASTY;

EID: 84930484195     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11791551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/OAJU.S21577     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Snodgrass WT, Koyle MA, Baskin LS, et al. Foreskin preservation in penile surgery. J Urol. 2006;176:711-714.
2. Mousavi SA, Salehifar E. Circumcision complications associated with the Plastibell device and conventional dissection surgery: a trial of 586 infants of ages up to 12 months. Adv Urol. 2008;606:123.
3. Kazem MM, Mehdi AA, Golrasteh KZ, et al. Comparative evaluation of two techniques of hemostasis in neonatal circumcision using the Plastibell device. J Pediatr Urol. 2010;6:258-260.
4. Snodgrass WT. Assessing outcomes of hypospadias surgery. J Urol. 2005;174:816-817.
5. Bhatti AZ, Naveed M, Adeniran A, et al. Preputial reconstruction with distal hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2007;3:132-134.
6. Cold CJ, Taylor JR. The prepuce. BJU Int. 1999;83:34-44.
7. Rickwood AM. Medical indications for circumcision. BJU Int. 1999; 83:45-51.
8. Haseebuddin M, Brandes SB. The prepuce: preservation and reconstruction. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18:575-582.
9. Klijn AJ, Dik P, de Jong TP. Results of preputial reconstruction in 77 boys with distal hypospadias. J Urol. 2001;165:1255-1257.
10. Snodgrass W, Ziada A, Yucel S, et al. Comparison of outcomes of tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair and circumcision: a questionnaire-based survey of parents and surgeon. J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4:250-254.
11. Gray J, Boston VE. Glanular reconstruction and preputioplasty repair for distal hypospadias: a unique day-case method to avoid urethral stenting and preserve the prepuce. BJU Int. 2003;91:268-268.
12. Aminsharifi A, Taddayun A, Assadolahpoor A, et al. Combined use of Mathieu procedure with plate incision for hypospadias repair: a randomized clinical trial. Urology. 2008;72:305-308.
13. Snodgrass WT, Khavari R. Prior circumcision does not complicate repair of hypospadias with an intact prepuce. J Urol. 2006;176:296-298.
14. Pieretti RV, Pieretti A, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R. Circumcised hypospadias. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25:53-55.
15. Mousavi SA. Use of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for secondary hypospadias repair or repair in circumcised patients. Int Braz J Urol. 2008;34:609-614.
16. Moslemi MK, Firoozabadi MHD. Severe anterior urethral stricture after proximal hypospadias repair - treatment and review of literature. Am J Case Rep. 2010;11:142-144.
17. Bracka A. A long term view of hypospadias. Br J Plast Surg.1989;42: 251-255.
18. Mureau MAM, Slijper FME, van der Meulen JC, et al. Psychosexual adjustment of men who underwent hypospadias repair: a norm-related study. J Urol. 1995;154:1351-1355.
19. American Academy of Pediatrics. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 1999;103:686-693.
20. American Urological Association. Circumcision - a continuing controversy. Update Series. 1995;14:170-175.
21. Moslemi MK, Abedinzadeh M, Aghaali M. Evaluation of epidemiology, safety, and complications of male circumcision using conventional dissection surgery: experience at one center. Open Access Journal of Urology. 2011;3:83-87.