Thinking about development: The Value of animal-based research for the study of human development

International Journal of Developmental Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 172-183

  Lickliter, Robert ^a   Bahrick, Lorraine E ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative developmental psychology; Gilbert gottlieb; Intersensory redundancy; Perceptual development; Psychobiology

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013580547     PISSN: 2192001X     EISSN: 21917485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/DEV-2007-1210     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bahrick, L.E. (1983). Infants’ perception of substance and temporal synchrony in multimodal events. Infant Behavior and Development, 6, 429-451.
2. Bahrick, L.E. (1987). Infants’ intermodal perception of two levels of temporal structure in natural events. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 387-416.
3. Bahrick, L.E. (2004). The development of perception in a multimodal environment. In G. Bremmer & A. Slater (Eds.), Theories of infant development (pp. 90-120). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
4. Bahrick, L.E., Flom, R., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates discrimination of tempo in 3-month-old infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 41, 352-363.
5. Bahrick, L.E., & Lickliter, R. (2000). Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity andperceptuallearningin infancy. Developmental Psychology, 36, 190-201.
6. Bahrick, L.E., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Intersensory redundancy guides early perceptual and cognitive development. In: R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 30 (pp. 153-187). NewYork: Academic Press.
7. Bahrick, L.E., & Lickliter, R. (2004). Infants’ detection of rhythm and tempo in unimodal and multimodal stimulation: A developmental test of the intersensory redundancy hypothesis. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 141-151.
8. Bahrick, L.E., Lickliter, R., & Flom, R. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates discrimination of tempo in 3-month-old infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 41, 352-363.
9. Bahrick, L.E., Lickliter, R., & Flom, R. (2004). Intersensory redundancy guides infants’ selective attention, perceptual, and cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 99-102.
10. Bahrick, L.E., Lickliter, R., & Flom, R. (2006). Up versus down: The role intersensory redundancy in the development of infants’ sensitivity to the orientation of moving objects. Infancy, 9, 73-96.
11. Columbus, R.E, & Lickliter, R. (1998). Modified sensory features of social stimulation alters the perceptual responsiveness of bobwhite quail chicks. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 161-169.
12. Dmitrieva, L.R, & Gottlieb, G. (1992). Development of the brainstem auditory pathway in mallard duck embryos and hatchlings. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 171, 665-671.
13. Gibson, E.J., & Pick, A.D. (2001). The ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Gogate, L.J., & Bahrick, L.E. (1998). Intersensory redundancy facilitates learning of arbitrary relations between vowel sounds and objects in seven-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 69, 1-17.
15. Gottlieb, G. (1971). Ontogenesis of sensory function in birds and mammals. In E. Tobach, L. Aron-son, & E. Shaw (Eds.), The biopsychology of development (pp. 67-128). New York: Academic.
16. Gottlieb, G. (1983). The psychobiological approach to developmental issues. In M. Haith & J. Campos (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Infancy and developmental psychobiology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-26). NewYork: Wiley.
17. Gottlieb, G. (1985). On discovering significant acoustic features of auditory stimulation for infants. In G. Gottlieb & N.A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Measurement of auditory and vision in the first year of postnatal life: A methodological overview (pp. 3-29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18. Gottlieb, G. (1991). Experiential canalization of behavioral development: Theory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 4-13.
19. Gottlieb, G. (1993). Social induction of malleability in ducklings: Sensory basis and psychological mechanism. Animal Behaviour, 45, 707-719.
20. Gottlieb, G. (1997). Synthesizing nature-nurture: Prenatal roots of instinctive behavior. Mah-wah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Gottlieb, G., (2001). The relevance of developmental psychobiological metatheory to developmental neuropsychology. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19, 1-9.
22. Gottlieb, G. (2003). Probabilistic epigenesis of development. In J. Valsiner & K.J. Connolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 3-17). London: Sage.
23. Gottlieb, G. & Krasnegor, N.A. (1985). Measurement of audition and vision in the first year of postnatal life: A methodological overview. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
24. Gottlieb, G., & Lickliter, R. (2004). The various roles of animal models in understanding human development. Social Development, 13, 311-325.
25. Gottlieb, G., Tomlinson, W.T., &Radell, RL. (1989). Developmental intersensory interference: Premature visual experience suppresses auditory learning in ducklings. Infant Behavior andDevelopment, 12, 1-12.
26. Gottlieb, G., Wahlsten, D., & Lickliter, R. (2006). The significance of biology for human development: A developmental psychobiological systems perspective. In R.M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (Vol.1, pp. 210-257).NewYork:Wiley.
27. Haith, M. M. (1993). Preparing for the 21st century: Some goals and challenges for studies of infant sensoryandperceptual development. Developmental Review, 13, 354-371.
28. Harper, L.V. (2005). Epigenetic inheritance and the intergenerational transfer of experience. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 340-360.
29. Hollich, G. J., Newman, R., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2005). Infants’ use of visual information to segment speech in noise. Child Development, 76, 598-613.
30. Hultsch, H., Schleuss, E, and Todt, D., (1999). Auditory-visual stimulus pairing enhances perceptual learning in a songbird, Animal Behaviour, 58:143-149.
31. Kellman, P.J., & Arterberry, M.E. (1998). The cradle of knowledge: Development of perception in infancy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Kenny, P., &Turkewitz, G. (1986). Effects of unusually early visual stimulation on the development of homing behavior in the rat pup. Developmental Psychobiology, 19, 57-66.
33. Kuo, Z.Y. (1967). The dynamics of behavior development: An epigenetic view. New York: Random House.
34. Kuo, Z.Y. (1970). The need for coordinated efforts in developmental studies. In Aronson, L.R., Tobach, E., Lehrman, D.S., & Rosenblatt, J.S. (Eds.), Development and evolution of behavior (pp. 181-193). San Francisco: W. Freeman.
35. Lehrman, D.S. (1953). A critique of Konrad Lorenz’s theory of instinctive behavior. Quarterly Review of Biology, 28, 337-363.
36. Lehrman, D.S. (1965). Interaction between internal and external environments in the regulation of the reproductive cycle of the ring dove. In FA. Beach (Ed.), Sex and behavior (pp. 358-380). NewYork: Wiley.
37. Lewkowicz, D.J. (1992). Respnsiveness to auditory and visual components of a sounding/ moving compound stimulus in human infants. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 519528.
38. Lewkowicz, D.J. (1996). Infants’ response to the audible and visible properties of the human face: 1. Role of lexical-syntactic content, temporal synchrony, gender, and manner of speech. Developmental Psychology, 32, 347-366.
39. Lewkowicz, D.J. (2000). The development of intersensory temporal perception: An epigenetic systems/limitationsview. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 281-308.
40. Lickliter, R. (1993). Timing and the development of perinatal perceptual organization. In G. Turkewitz & D. Devenny (Eds.), Developmental time and timing (pp. 105-123). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Lickliter, R. (2000). Atypical perinatal sensory stimulation and early perceptual development: Insights from developmental psychobiology. Journal of Perinatology, 20, 45-54.
42. Lickliter, R. & Bahrick, L.E. (2000). The development of infant intersensory perception: Advantages of a comparative convergent-operations approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 260-280.
43. Lickliter, R., & Bahrick, L.E. (2001). The salience of multimodal sensory stimulation in early development: Implications for the issue of ecological validity. Infancy, 2, 451-467.
44. Lickliter, R., & Bahrick, L.E. (2004). Perceptual development and the origins of multisensory responsiveness. In G. Calvert, C. Spence, & B.E. Stein (Eds.), Handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 643-654). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L.E., & Honeycutt, H. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates prenatal perceptual learning in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychology, 38, 15-23.
46. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L.E., & Honeycutt, H. (2004). Intersensory redundancy enhances memoryin bobwhite quail embryos. Infancy, 5, 253-269.
47. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L.E., &Markham, R.G. (2006). Intersensory redundancy educates selective attention in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Science, 9, 605-616.
48. Lickliter, R., & Banker, H. (1994). Prenatal components of intersensory development in pre-cocial birds. In D.J. Lewkowicz & R. Lickliter (Eds.), Development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (pp. 59-80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Markham, R.G., Toth, G., & Lickliter, R. (2006). Prenatally elevated physiological arousal interferes with perceptual learning in bobwhite quail embryos. Behavioral Neuroscience.
50. Michel, G., & Moore, C. (1995). Developmental psychobiology: An integrative science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. McBride, T., & Lickliter, R. (1993). Social experience with siblings fosters species-specific responsiveness to maternal cues in bobwhite quail chicks. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107, 320-327.
52. Radell, PL., & Gottlieb, G. (1992). Developmental intersensory interference: Augmented prenatal sensory experience interferes with auditory learning in duck embryos. Developmental Psychology, 28, 795-803.
53. Schneirla, T.C. (1957). The concept of development in comparative psychology. In D.B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development (pp. 78-108). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
54. Spear, N.E., & McKinzie, D.L. (1994). Intersensory integration in the infant rat. In: D.J. Lewkowicz & R. Lickliter (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (pp. 133-161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Sullivan, R., Wilson, D., Feldon, J., Yee, B., Meyer, U, Richter-Levin, G., Avi, A., Michael, T., Gruss, M., Bock, J., Helmeke, C, Braun, K. (2006). The International Society for Developmental Psychobiology Annual Meeting Symposium: Impact of early life experiences on brain andbehavioral development. Developmental Psychobiology, 48, 583-602.
56. Thelen, E. & Smith, L.B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Turkewitz, G. & Kenny, P.A. (1982). Limitations on input as a basis for neural organization and perceptual development: A preliminary theoretical statement. Developmental Psychobiology, 15, 357-368.
58. Walker-Andrews, A.S. (1997). Infants’ perception of expressive behavior: Differentiation of multimodal information. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 437-456.