Constraint-based modeling and ambiguity

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 29-63

  Menzel, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

CALL; Constraints; Diagnosis; Foreign language learning; Grammar; Model based diagnosis; Tutoring systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013570860     PISSN: 15604292     EISSN: 15604306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Daum, M., Foth, K., & Menzel, W. (2003). Constraint-based integration of deep and shallow parsing techniques. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference of the ACL, EACL-2003 (pp. 99-106). Budapest, Hungary.
2. Foth, K., Daum, M., & Menzel, W. (2005a). A broad coverage parser for German based on defeasible constraints. In Constraint Solving and Language Processing, Vol 3438, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
3. Foth, K., Menzel, W., & Schröder, I. (2005b). Robust parsing with weighted constraints. Natural Language Engineering, 11(1), 1-25.
4. Hamburger, H. (1995). Tutorial tools for language learning by two-medium dialogue. In V. M. Holland, J. D. Kaplan & M. R. Sams(Eds.) Intelligent Language Tutors (pp. 183-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Heift, T. (1998). Designed Intelligence: A Language Teacher Model. PhD-Thesis, Simon Fraser University.
6. Holland, M. V. (1994). Lessons learned in designing intelligent call: Managing communication across disciplines. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 7(3), 227-256.
7. Martin, B., & Mitrovic, A. (2000). Tailoring feedback by correcting student answers. In Proceedings 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS-2000 (pp. 383-392). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
8. Martin, B., & Mitrovic, A. (2002). Automatic problem generation in constraint-based tutors In S. Cerri, G. Gouarderes & F. Paraguacu (Eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS-2002 (pp. 388-398). Volume 2363 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer.
9. Menzel, W. (1990). Anticipation-free diagnosis of structural faults. In Proceedings 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Coling-1990 (pp. 422-424). Volume III, Helsinki, Finland.
10. Menzel, W. (1992). Modellbasierte Fehlerdiagnose für Sprachlehrsysteme. Sprache und Information. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
11. Menzel, W. (1998). Sehen und Verstehen: Der Beitrag bildlicher Information zum Sprachverstehen. In Tagungsband GI-Jahrestagung 1998 (pp. 161-170). Magdeburg: Springer-Verlag.
12. Menzel, W. (2004). Errors, intentions, and explanations: Feedback generation for language tutoring systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference InSTIL/ICALL-2004 (pp. 75-82). Venice, Italy.
13. Menzel, W., & Schröder, I. (1998a). Constraint-based diagnosis for intelligent language tutoring systems. In Proceedings IT&KNOWS, IFIP World Congress (pp. 484-497).Wien and Budapest.
14. Menzel, W., & Schröder, I. (1998b). Model-based diagnosis under structural uncertainty. In Proceedings European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI-1998 (pp. 284-288). Brighton, UK.
15. Mitrovic, A. (1998). A knowledge-based teaching systemfor SQL. In Proceedings ED-MEDIA/ED-TELECOM-98 (pp. 1027-1032). Freiburg, Germany.
16. Mitrovic, A., Koedinger, K. R., & Martin, B. (2003). A comparative analysis of cognitive tutoring and constraintbased modelling. In Proceedings 9th International Conference on User Modeling, UM-2003 (pp. 313-322). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
17. Mitrovic, A., Mayo, M., Suraweera, P., & Martin, B. (2001). Constraint-based tutors: a success story. In Proceedings 14th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of AI and Expert Systems, IEA/AIE-2001 (pp. 931-940) Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
18. Mitrovic, A., & Ohlsson, S. (1999). Evaluation of a constraint-based tutor for a database languange. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 238-256.
19. Ohlsson, S. (1994). Constraint-based student modeling In J. E. Greer & G. I. McCalla (Eds.) Student Modeling: The Key to Individualized Knowledge-based Instruction (pp. 167-189). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
20. Reiter, R. (1987). A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artificial Intelligence, 32, 57-95.
21. Reuer, V. (2003). PromisD: Ein Analyseverfahren zur antizipationsfreien Erkennung und Erklärung von grammatischen Fehlern in Sprachlehrsystemen. Dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
22. Schröder, I., Menzel, W., Foth, K., & Schulz, M. (2000). Modeling dependency grammar with restricted constraints. Traitement Automatique des Langues (T.A.L.), 41(1), 97-126.
23. Schwind, C. B. (1995). Error analysis and explanation in knowledge based language tutoring. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(4), 295-324.
24. Self, J. (1992). Cognitive diagnosis for tutoring systems. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI-1992 (pp. 699-703). Vienna, Austria.
25. Stockfleth, N. (2000). Integration von CDG-Parsing und Fehlersimulation. Diplomarbeit, Universität Hamburg, Fachbereich Informatik.
26. Vandeventer, A. (2000). Diagnostic d’erreurs grammaticales par relâchement de contraintes dans le cadre de l’ELAO. In Proceedings TALN-2000 (pp. 357-366).
27. Weischedel, R. M., & Black, J. E. (1980). Responding intelligently to unparsable inputs. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 6(2), 97-109.