Preliminary engineering analysis of the august 24th 2016, ml 6.0 central Italy earthquake records

Annals of Geophysics

Volumn 59, Issue FASTTRACK5, 2016, Pages

  Iervolino, Iunio ^a   Baltzopoulos, Georgios ^a   Chioccarelli, Eugenio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; GROUND MOTION; RETURN PERIOD;

ITALY; LAZIO; RIETI;

EID: 85013270040     PISSN: 15935213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4401/ag-7182     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baker J.W. (2007). Quantitative Classification of Near-Fault Ground Motions Using Wavelet Analysis. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97(5):1486–1501.
2. Baltzopoulos G., D. Vamvatsikos and I. Iervolino (2016). Analytical modelling of nearsource pulse-like seismic demand for multilinear backbone oscillators. Earth. Engin. Struct. Dyn., 45(11):1797–1815.
3. Bindi D., L. Luzi, S. Parolai, D. Di Giacomo and G. Monachesi (2011). Site effects observed in alluvial basins: the case of Norcia (central Italy). Bull. Earthquake Eng., 9:1941-1959.
4. Chioccarelli E., I. Iervolino (2010). Near-Source Seismic Demand and Pulse-Like Records: a Discussion for L'Aquila Earthquake. Earthq. Engn. Struct. Dyn., 39(9):1039–1062.
5. CS.LL.PP. (2008). Decreto Ministeriale 14 gennaio 2008: Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, 29 (in Italian).
6. Iervolino I., C.A. Cornell (2008). Probability of occurrence of velocity pulses in near-source ground motions. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 98(5):2262-2277.
7. Iervolino, I. (2013). Probabilities and fallacies: why hazard maps cannot be validated by individual earthquakes. Earthq. Spectra, 29(3):125-1136.
8. Iervolino, I., C. Galasso and E. Cosenza (2010). REXEL: computer aided record selection for code based seismic structural analysis. Bull. Earthq. Eng., 8:339-362.
9. Iervolino, I., E. Chioccarelli and V. Convertito (2011). Engineering design earthquakes from multimodal hazard disaggregation. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31:1212-1231.
10. w 6.0 Amatrice earthquake. Annals of Geophysics, 59, Doi: 10.4401/ag-702.
11. ReLUIS-INGV Workgroup (2016a). Preliminary study of Rieti earthquake ground motion records V5, available at http://www.reluis.it.
12. ReLUIS-INGV Workgroup (2016b). Preliminary study on strong motion data of the 2016 central Italy seismic sequence V6, available at http://www.reluis.it.
13. Somerville P.G., N.F. Smith, R.W. Graves and N.A. Abrahamson (1997). Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismol. Res. Lett., 68:199–222.
14. Spudich, P., B.S.J. Chiou (2008). Directivity in NGA earthquake ground motions: analysis using isochrone theory. Earthq. Spectra 24(1): 279-298.
15. Stucchi, M., C. Meletti, V. Montaldo, H. Crowley, G.M. Calvi and E. Boschi (2011). Seismic hazard assessment (2003–2009) for the Italian building code. B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 101:1885– 1911.
16. L 6.0, 2016, Amatrice earthquake estimated with rapid finite-fault inversion. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43(10): 10,745-10,752.