메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 28-33

Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Acute Adhesive Small-Bowel Obstruction: A Propensity Score–Matched Analysis

Author keywords

acute abdomen; adhesiolysis; complication; emergency; Laparoscopy; randomized controlled trial; retrospective; small bowel obstruction

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPENSITY SCORE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SMALL INTESTINE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TISSUE ADHESIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

EID: 85013249514     PISSN: 14574969     EISSN: 17997267     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1457496916641341     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (40)

References (20)
  • 1
    • 78651522080 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2010 evidence-based guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery
    • Catena F, Di Saverio S, Kelly MD, : Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2010 evidence-based guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery. World J Emerg Surg 2011;6:5.
    • (2011) World J Emerg Surg , vol.6 , pp. 5
    • Catena, F.1    Di Saverio, S.2    Kelly, M.D.3
  • 2
    • 84900854638 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Long-term follow-up for adhesive small bowel obstruction after open versus laparoscopic surgery for suspected appendicitis
    • Isaksson K, Montgomery A, Moberg A-C, : Long-term follow-up for adhesive small bowel obstruction after open versus laparoscopic surgery for suspected appendicitis. Ann Surg 2014;259:1173–1177.
    • (2014) Ann Surg , vol.259 , pp. 1173-1177
    • Isaksson, K.1    Montgomery, A.2    Moberg, A.-C.3
  • 3
    • 0031891536 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs open cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis
    • Lujan JA, Parrilla P, Robles R, : Laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs open cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Arch Surg 1998;133:173–175.
    • (1998) Arch Surg , vol.133 , pp. 173-175
    • Lujan, J.A.1    Parrilla, P.2    Robles, R.3
  • 4
    • 12744262846 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: Five-year results of a randomized prospective trial
    • Huscher CGS, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, : Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: Five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2005;241:232–237.
    • (2005) Ann Surg , vol.241 , pp. 232-237
    • Huscher, C.G.S.1    Mingoli, A.2    Sgarzini, G.3
  • 5
    • 79954576661 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopy for acute small bowel obstruction: Indication or contraindication?
    • Tierris I, Mavrantonis C, Stratoulias C, : Laparoscopy for acute small bowel obstruction: Indication or contraindication? Surg Endosc 2011;25:531–535.
    • (2011) Surg Endosc , vol.25 , pp. 531-535
    • Tierris, I.1    Mavrantonis, C.2    Stratoulias, C.3
  • 6
    • 84857416721 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The role of laparoscopy in the management of acute small-bowel obstruction: A review of over 2,000 cases
    • O’Connor DB, Winter DC, : The role of laparoscopy in the management of acute small-bowel obstruction: A review of over 2,000 cases. Surg Endosc 2012;26:12–17.
    • (2012) Surg Endosc , vol.26 , pp. 12-17
    • O’Connor, D.B.1    Winter, D.C.2
  • 8
    • 0642369251 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions
    • Chopra R, McVay C, Phillips E, : Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. Am Surg 2003;69:966–968.
    • (2003) Am Surg , vol.69 , pp. 966-968
    • Chopra, R.1    McVay, C.2    Phillips, E.3
  • 9
    • 72549102320 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Management of acute small bowel obstruction from intestinal adhesions: Indications for laparoscopic surgery in a community teaching hospital
    • Grafen FC, Neuhaus V, Schöb O, : Management of acute small bowel obstruction from intestinal adhesions: Indications for laparoscopic surgery in a community teaching hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010;395:57–63.
    • (2010) Langenbecks Arch Surg , vol.395 , pp. 57-63
    • Grafen, F.C.1    Neuhaus, V.2    Schöb, O.3
  • 10
    • 84900817154 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparative analysis between laparoscopic and open adhesiolysis at a tertiary care center
    • Davies SW, Gillen JR, Guidry CA, : A comparative analysis between laparoscopic and open adhesiolysis at a tertiary care center. Am Surg 2014;80:261–269.
    • (2014) Am Surg , vol.80 , pp. 261-269
    • Davies, S.W.1    Gillen, J.R.2    Guidry, C.A.3
  • 11
    • 34247639581 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: Patients’ outcome and cost-effectiveness
    • Khaikin M, Schneidereit N, Cera S, : Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: Patients’ outcome and cost-effectiveness. Surg Endosc 2007;21:742–746.
    • (2007) Surg Endosc , vol.21 , pp. 742-746
    • Khaikin, M.1    Schneidereit, N.2    Cera, S.3
  • 12
    • 0141518209 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction
    • Wullstein C, Gross E, : Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 2003;90:1147–1151.
    • (2003) Br J Surg , vol.90 , pp. 1147-1151
    • Wullstein, C.1    Gross, E.2
  • 13
    • 84939485000 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: A comparison of outcomes
    • Byrne J, Saleh F, Ambrosini L, : Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: A comparison of outcomes. Surg Endosc 2015;29:2525–2532.
    • (2015) Surg Endosc , vol.29 , pp. 2525-2532
    • Byrne, J.1    Saleh, F.2    Ambrosini, L.3
  • 14
    • 84906939045 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of small bowel obstruction: An analysis of short-term outcomes
    • Saleh F, Ambrosini L, Jackson T, : Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of small bowel obstruction: An analysis of short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2014;28:2381–2386.
    • (2014) Surg Endosc , vol.28 , pp. 2381-2386
    • Saleh, F.1    Ambrosini, L.2    Jackson, T.3
  • 15
    • 84893021612 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparotomy for small-bowel obstruction: First choice or last resort for adhesiolysis? A laparoscopic approach for small-bowel obstruction reduces 30-day complications
    • Kelly KN, Iannuzzi JC, Rickles AS, : Laparotomy for small-bowel obstruction: First choice or last resort for adhesiolysis? A laparoscopic approach for small-bowel obstruction reduces 30-day complications. Surg Endosc 2014;28:65–73.
    • (2014) Surg Endosc , vol.28 , pp. 65-73
    • Kelly, K.N.1    Iannuzzi, J.C.2    Rickles, A.S.3
  • 16
    • 84896700958 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Should adhesive small bowel obstruction be managed laparoscopically? A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program propensity score analysis
    • Lombardo S, Baum K, Filho JD, : Should adhesive small bowel obstruction be managed laparoscopically? A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program propensity score analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76:696–703.
    • (2014) J Trauma Acute Care Surg , vol.76 , pp. 696-703
    • Lombardo, S.1    Baum, K.2    Filho, J.D.3
  • 17
    • 79952379427 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The role of laparoscopy in small bowel obstruction after previous laparotomy for trauma: An initial report
    • Simmons JD, Rogers EA, Porter JM, : The role of laparoscopy in small bowel obstruction after previous laparotomy for trauma: An initial report. Am Surg 2011;77:185–187.
    • (2011) Am Surg , vol.77 , pp. 185-187
    • Simmons, J.D.1    Rogers, E.A.2    Porter, J.M.3
  • 18
    • 77952521295 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction: The reason for conversion matters
    • Dindo D, Schafer M, Muller MK, : Laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction: The reason for conversion matters. Surg Endosc 2010;24:792–797.
    • (2010) Surg Endosc , vol.24 , pp. 792-797
    • Dindo, D.1    Schafer, M.2    Muller, M.K.3
  • 19
  • 20
    • 84927566354 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction—A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial
    • Sallinen V, Wikström H, Victorzon M, : Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction—A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Surg 2014;14:77.
    • (2014) BMC Surg , vol.14 , pp. 77
    • Sallinen, V.1    Wikström, H.2    Victorzon, M.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.