Should adhesive small bowel obstruction be managed laparoscopically? A national surgical quality improvement program propensity score analysis

Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 696-703

  Lombardo, Sarah ^a   Baum, Kerry ^a   Filho, Jorge Deamorim ^a   Nirula, Ram ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Celiotomy; Laparoscopic surgery; Outcomes; Small bowel obstruction

Indexed keywords

ADHESIOLYSIS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; REOPERATION; SMALL INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPENSITY SCORE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84896700958     PISSN: 21630755     EISSN: 21630763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000156     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. O'Connor DB, Winter DC. The role of laparoscopy in the management of acute small-bowel obstruction: a review of over 2,000 cases. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:12-17.
2. Matter I, et al. Does the index operation influence the course and outcome of adhesive intestinal obstruction? Eur J Surg. 1997;163:767-772.
3. Angenete E, Jacobsson A, Gellerstedt M, Haglind E. Effect of laparoscopy on the risk of small-bowel obstruction: a population-based register study. Arch Surg. 2012;147:359-365.
4. Schnüriger B, et al. Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: a review of the literature. Am J Surg. 2011;201:111-121.
5. Levard H, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71:641-646.
6. Cirocchi R,Abraha I, Farinella E,MontedoriA, Sciannameo F. Laparoscopic versus open surgery in small bowel obstruction.CochraneDatabase Syst Rev. 2010;CD007511.
7. Ghosheh B, Salameh JR. Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: review of 1061 cases. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1945-1949.
8. Li M-Z, et al. Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2012;204:779-786.
9. Nagle A, Ujiki M, Denham W, Murayama K. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg. 2004;187:464-470.
10. Szomstein S, Lo Menzo E, Simpfendorfer C, Zundel N, Rosenthal RJ. Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. World J Surg. 2006;30:535-540.
11. Borzellino G, Tasselli S, Zerman G, Pedrazzani C, Manzoni G. Laparoscopic approach to postoperative adhesive obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18:686-690.
12. Chosidow D, et al. Laparoscopy for acute small-bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2000;10:155-159.
13. Khaikin M, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for acute adhesive smallbowel obstruction: patients' outcome and cost-effectiveness. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:742-746.
14. Maung AA, et al. Evaluation and management of small-bowel obstruction: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:S362-S369.
15. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41-55.
16. Dehejia RH, Wahba S. Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev Econ Stats. 2002;84(1):151-161.