Correction: Gender diversity leads to better science (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2017) 114 (1740-1742) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1700616114);Gender diversity leads to better science

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 114, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 1740-1742

  Nielsen, Mathias Wullum ^a   Alegria, Sharla ^b   Börjeson, Love ^c   Etzkowitz, Henry ^d,e   Falk Krzesinski, Holly J ^f,g   Joshi, Aparna ^h   Leahey, Erin ⁱ   Smith Doerr, Laurel ^j   Woolley, Anita Williams ^k   Schiebinger, Londa ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Stanford University   (United States)

^e Triple Helix Association   (Italy)

^f ELSEVIER MASSON   (France)

^g NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^k CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAINSTORMING; CREATIVITY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PRODUCTIVITY; RESEARCH; SEX DIFFERENCE; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; MALE; PROCEDURES; SCIENCE;

FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; MALE; SCIENCE;

EID: 85013220480     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1703146114     Document Type: Erratum

References (11)

1. European Commission (2012) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A reinforced European Research Area Partnership for Excellence and Growth (European Commission, Brussels).
2. Valantine HA, Collins FS (2015) National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(40):12240-12242.
3. Maes K, Gvozdanovic J, Buitendijk S, Hallberg IR, Mantilleri B (2012) Women, Research and Universities: Excellence Without Gender Bias (League of European Universities, Leuven, Belgium).
4. Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686-688.
5. Woolley AW, Aggarwal I, Malone TW (2015) Collective intelligence and group performance. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 24(6):420-424.
6. Joshi A (2014) By whom and when is women's expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams. Adm Sci Q 25(2):202-239.
7. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) (2001) Drug Safety: Most Drugs Withdrawn in Recent Years Had Greater Health Risks for Women (Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC).
8. Dobbin F, Schrage D, Kalev A (2015) Rage against the iron cage: The varied effects of bureaucratic personnel reforms on diversity. Am Sociol Rev 80(5):1014-1044.
9. Smith-Doerr L (2004) Women's Work: Gender Equality vs. Hierarchy in the Life Sciences (Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO).
10. Cain CL, Leahey E (2014) Cultural correlates of gender integration in science. Gend Work Organ 21(6):516-530.
11. Nishii LH (2013) The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Acad Manage J 56(6):1754-1774.