A staging system for correct phenotype interpretation of mouse embryos harvested on embryonic day 14 (E14.5)

Journal of Anatomy

Volumn 230, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 710-719

  Geyer, Stefan H ^a   Reissig, Lukas ^a   Rose, Julia ^a   Wilson, Robert ^b   Prin, Fabrice ^b   Szumska, Dorota ^c   Ramirez Solis, Ramiro ^d   Tudor, Catherine ^d   White, Jacqui ^d   Mohun, Timothy J ^b   Weninger, Wolfgang J ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b THE FRANCIS CRICK INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Deciphering the Mechanisms of Developmental Disorders; embryo; high resolution episcopic microscopy; knock out; morphology; mutant

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FORELIMB; GOUT; HEART; HOMOZYGOSITY; MORPHOMETRY; NONHUMAN; PALATE; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; MOUSE; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 85013218989     PISSN: 00218782     EISSN: 14697580     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joa.12590     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Adams D, Baldock R, Bhattacharya S, et al. (2013) Bloomsbury report on mouse embryo phenotyping: recommendations from the IMPC workshop on embryonic lethal screening. Dis Model Mech 6, 571–579.
2. Ayadi A, Birling MC, Bottomley J, et al. (2012) Mouse large-scale phenotyping initiatives: overview of the European Mouse Disease Clinic (EUMODIC) and of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Mouse Genetics Project. Mamm Genome 23, 600–610.
3. Boehm B, Rautschka M, Quintana L, et al. (2011) A landmark-free morphometric staging system for the mouse limb bud. Development 138, 1227–1234.
4. Brown SD, Hancock JM, Gates H (2006) Understanding mammalian genetic systems: the challenge of phenotyping in the mouse. PLoS Genet 2, e118.
5. Hrabe de Angelis M, Nicholson G, Selloum M, et al. (2015) Analysis of mammalian gene function through broad-based phenotypic screens across a consortium of mouse clinics. Nat Genet 47, 969–978.
6. Kaufman MH (1992) The Atlas of Mouse Development. London, UK: Academic Press, Harcourt Brace & Company.
7. Mohun TJ, Weninger WJ (2012a) Embedding embryos for high-resolution episcopic microscopy (HREM). Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2012, 678–680.
8. Mohun TJ, Weninger WJ (2012b) Generation of volume data by episcopic three-dimensional imaging of embryos. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2012, 681–682.
9. Mohun T, Adams DJ, Baldock R, et al. (2013) Deciphering the Mechanisms of Developmental Disorders (DMDD): a new programme for phenotyping embryonic lethal mice. Dis Model Mech 6, 562–566.
10. Mouse Genome Database (MGD). The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. URL: http://www.informatics.jax.org.
11. Theiler K (1989) The House Mouse: Atlas of Embryonic Development. New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Wanek N, Muneoka K, Holler-Dinsmore G, et al. (1989) A staging system for mouse limb development. J Exp Zool 249, 41–49.
13. Weninger WJ, Geyer SH, Mohun TJ, et al. (2006) High-resolution episcopic microscopy: a rapid technique for high detailed 3D analysis of gene activity in the context of tissue architecture and morphology. Anat Embryol 211, 213–221.
14. Weninger WJ, Geyer SH, Martineau A, et al. (2014) Phenotyping structural abnormalities in mouse embryos using high-resolution episcopic microscopy. Dis Model Mech 7, 1143–1152.
15. Wong MD, Dorr AE, Walls JR, et al. (2012) A novel 3D mouse embryo atlas based on micro-CT. Development 139, 3248–3256.
16. Wong MD, van Eede MC, Spring S, et al. (2015) 4D atlas of the mouse embryo for precise morphological staging. Development 142, 3583–3591.