Ethics: Predatory publishing: Keeping the wolves from your office door

Online Journal of Issues in Nursing

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Sorrell, Jeanne Merkle ^a   Owens, Jacqueline K ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ASHLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; FRAUD; NURSING RESEARCH; OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; FRAUD; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; NURSING RESEARCH; OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85013191429     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10913734     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol20No03EthCol01     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Beall, J. (2015). Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers. (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://scholarlyoa.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/criteria-2015.pdf.
2. Beall, J. (2014a). Opening session: Open access or good editors stand out in a world of predatory publishers. In International Academy of Nursing Editors Annual Meeting, 2014 conducted in Portland, ME.
3. Beall, J. (2014b). 3 "Principles of Transparency" to help authors assess journal credibility. Retrieved from http://www.editage.com/insights/3-principles-of-transparency-to-help-authors-assess-journal-credibility.
4. Beall, J. (n.d.). Scholarly open access: Critical analysis of scholarly open access publishing. Retrieved from http://scholarlyoa.com/.
5. Chinn, P. (2014, November 26). Open access: What it is and what it is not. [Web log] ANS: Advances in Nursing Science Blog. Retrieved from http://ansjournalblog.com/2014/11/26/open-access-what-it-is-and-what-it-is-not/.
6. Conn, V. (2015). Editorial. Paying the price for open access. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 37 (1), 3-5. doi: 10.1177/0193945914554257.
7. Flanagan, J. (2015). Editorial. Predatory publishers: Authors beware. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 26(1), 1. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12069.
8. INANE Predatory Publishing Practices Collaborative. (2014). Predatory publishing: What editors need to know. Nurse Author & Editor, 24(3), 1. Retrieved from www.nurseauthoreditor.com/article.asp?id=261.
9. Kozok, U. (n.d.). Predatory publishing: A case study. Indo-Pacific Languages and Literature. Retrieved from http://ipll.manoa.hawaii.edu/internal/documents/predatory-publishers/.
10. Moules, N. (2006). A whispered story. In C.S. Dinkins & J. S. Sorrell (Eds.) Listening to the whispers. Re-thinking ethics in healthcare. Interpretive Studies in Healthcare and the Human Sciences, Vol. 5, 7-9. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
11. Pickler, R., Noyes, J., Perry, L., Roe, B., Watson, R., & Hayter, M. (2014). Editorial. Authors and readers beware the dark side of open access. Journal of Advanced Nursing. doi: 10.1111/jan.12589.
12. Pierson, C. (2014). Editorial. Predatory and deceptive publishing practices now target nurses. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 26, 583. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12193.
13. Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing. (2013). Retrieved from http://publicationethics.org/files/Principles%20of%20Transparency%20and%20Best%20Practice%20in%20Scholarly%20Publishing.pdf.
14. Thorne, S. (2014). Getting something published? Or joining a conversation. Nursing Inquiry, 21(2), 91. doi:10.1111/nin.12071.