Predatory and deceptive publishing practices now target nurses

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 583-583

  Pierson, Charon A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECEPTION; ETHICS; HUMAN; NURSE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; STANDARDS;

DECEPTION; HUMANS; NURSES; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH;

EID: 84910087257     PISSN: 23276886     EISSN: 23276924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/2327-6924.12193     Document Type: Editorial

References (3)

1. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2014). Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing. Retrieved from http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines.
2. INANE Predatory Publishing Practices Collaborative. (2014). Predatory publishing: What editors need to know. Nurse Author & Editor, 24(3), 1.
3. Pierson, C. A. (2014). Fake science and peer review: Who is minding the gate? American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 26, 1-2. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12092