Carbon debt and payback time – Lost in the forest?

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 73, Issue , 2017, Pages 1211-1217

  Bentsen, Niclas Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Carbon debt; Forest bioenergy; Machine learning; Meta analysis; Payback time

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

BIO-ENERGY; CARBON DEBT; CO 2 EMISSION; ENERGY; FOREST BIOENERGY; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; MACHINE-LEARNING; META-ANALYSIS; PAYBACK TIME; TEMPORAL DISPLACEMENT;

CARBON;

EID: 85012927447     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: 18790690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.004     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. [1] Schulze, E.-D., Körner, C., Law, B.E., Haberl, H., Luyssaert, S., Large-scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral. GCB Bioenergy 4 (2012), 611–616.
2. [2] Ter-Mikaelian, M.T., Colombo, S.J., Chen, J., The burning question: does forest bioenergy reduce carbon emissions? A review of common misconceptions about forest carbon Accounting. J For 113 (2015), 57–68.
3. [3] Lamers, P., Junginger, M., The ‘debt’ is in the detail: a synthesis of recent temporal forest carbon analyses on woody biomass for energy. Biofuels, Bioprod Bioref 7 (2013), 373–385.
4. [4] Dehue, B., Implications of a ‘carbon debt' on bioenergy's potential to mitigate climate change. Biofuels, Bioprod Bioref 7 (2013), 228–234.
5. [5] Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., Hawthorne, P., Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt. Science 319 (2008), 1235–1238.
6. [6] Marland, G., Schlamadinger, B., Biomass fuels and forest-management strategies: how do we calculate the greenhouse-gas emissions benefits?. Energy 20 (1995), 1131–1140.
7. [7] Schlamadinger, B., Marland, G., The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle. Biomass- Bioenergy 10 (1996), 275–300.
8. [8] Leemans, R., van Amstel, A., Battjes, C., Kreileman, E., Toet, S., The land cover and carbon cycle consequences of large-scale utilizations of biomass as an energy source. Glob Environ Change 6 (1996), 335–357.
9. [9] Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH, editors. Climate change 1995-Impacts, adaptions and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses, Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
10. [10] Mitchell, S.R., Harmon, M.E., O'Connell, K.E.B., Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production. GCB Bioenergy 4 (2012), 818–827.
11. [11] Naudts, K., Chen, Y., McGrath, M.J., Ryder, J., Valade, A., Otto, J., et al. Europe's forest management did not mitigate climate warming. Science 351 (2016), 597–600.
12. [12] Nabuurs G-J, EJMM Arets, Schelhaas M-J. European forests show no carbon debt, only a long parity effect. Forest Policy and Economics; 2016.
13. [13] Buchholz, T., Hurteau, M.D., Gunn, J., Saah, D., A global meta-analysis of forest bioenergy greenhouse gas emission accounting studies. GCB Bioenergy 8 (2016), 281–289.
14. [14] Cherubini, F., Bright, R.M., Stromman, A.H., Site-specific global warming potentials of biogenic CO2for bioenergy: contributions from carbon fluxes and albedo dynamics. Environ Res Lett, 2012, 7.
15. [15] Cherubini, F., Peters, G.P., Berntsen, T., Strømman, A.H., Hertwich, E., CO2emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. GCB Bioenergy 3 (2011), 413–426.
16. [16] Demirbas, A., Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci 30 (2004), 219–230.
17. [17] Capareda, S., Introduction to biomass energy conversions. 2013, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
18. [18] Christiansen, J.R., Gundersen, P., Frederiksen, P., Vesterdal, L., Influence of hydromorphic soil conditions on greenhouse gas emissions and soil carbon stocks in a Danish temperate forest. For Ecol Manag 284 (2012), 185–195.
19. [19] Walker, T., Cardellichio, P., Gunn, J.S., Saah, D.S., Hagan, J.M., Carbon accounting for woody biomass from Massachusetts (USA) managed forests: a framework for determining the temporal impacts of wood biomass energy on atmospheric greenhouse gas levels. J Sustain For 32 (2012), 130–158.
20. [20] Zanchi, G., Pena, N., Bird, N., Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. GCB Bioenergy 4 (2012), 761–772.
21. [21] Repo, A., Tuomi, M., Liski, J., Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues. GCB Bioenergy 3 (2011), 107–115.
22. [22] Lamers, P., Junginger, M., Dymond, C.C., Faaij, A., Damaged forests provide an opportunity to mitigate climate change. GCB Bioenergy 6 (2014), 44–60.
23. [23] McKechnie, J., Colombo, S., Chen, J., Mabee, W., MacLean, H.L., forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels. Environ Sci Technol 45 (2010), 789–795.
24. [24] Bernier, P., Paré, D., Using ecosystem CO2measurements to estimate the timing and magnitude of greenhouse gas mitigation potential of forest bioenergy. GCB Bioenergy 5 (2013), 67–72.
25. [25] Jonker, J.G.G., Junginger, M., Faaij, A., Carbon payback period and carbon offset parity point of wood pellet production in the South-eastern United States. GCB Bioenergy 6 (2014), 371–389.
26. [26] Colnes, A., Doshi, K., Emick, H., Evans, A., Perschel, R., Robards, T., et al. Biomass supply and carbon accounting for southeastern forests. 2012, Biomass Energy Resource Center, Montpelier, VT, USA, 123.
27. [27] Mika, A.M., Keeton, W.S., Net carbon fluxes at stand and landscape scales from wood bioenergy harvests in the US Northeast. GCB Bioenergy 7 (2015), 438–454.
28. [28] Withers, M.R., Malina, R., Barrett, S.R.H., Carbon, climate, and economic breakeven times for biofuel from woody biomass from managed forests. Ecol Econ 112 (2015), 45–52.
29. [29] Mitchell, S.R., Harmon, M.E., O'Connell, K.E.B., Forest fuel reduction alters fire severity and long-term carbon storage in three Pacific Northwest ecosystems. Ecol Appl, 19, 2009, 643 [55].
30. [30] Ter-Mikaelian, M.T., McKechnie, J., Colombo, S.J., Chen, J., MacLean, H.L., The carbon neutrality assumption for forest bioenergy: a case study for northwestern Ontario. For Chron, 2011, 87.
31. [31] Holtsmark, B., Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt. Clim Change, 112, 2012, 415 [28].
32. [32] Baral, A., Guha, G.S., Trees for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution: the issue of cost vs. carbon benefit. Biomass- Bioenergy 27 (2004), 41–55.
33. [33] Winford, E.M., Gaither, J.C. Jr, Carbon outcomes from fuels treatment and bioenergy production in a Sierra Nevada forest. For Ecol Manag 282 (2012), 1–9.
34. [34] Oliver, C.D., Nassar, N.T., Lippke, B.R., McCarter, J.B., Carbon, Fossil Fuel, and Biodiversity Mitigation With Wood and Forests. J Sustain For 33 (2014), 248–275.
35. [35] Ter-Mikaelian, M.T., Colombo, S.J., Lovekin, D., McKechnie, J., Reynolds, R., Titus, B., et al. Carbon debt repayment or carbon sequestration parity? Lessons from a forest bioenergy case study in Ontario, Canada. GCB Bioenergy 7 (2015), 704–716.
36. [36] McKechnie, J., MacLean, H.L., Implications of emissions timing on the cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies: application to forest bioenergy systems. GCB Bioenergy 6 (2014), 414–424.
37. [37] Daigneault, A., Sohngen, B., Sedjo, R., Economic approach to assess the forest carbon implications of biomass energy. Environ Sci Technol 46 (2012), 5664–5671.
38. [38] Galik, C.S., Abt, R.C., The effect of assessment scale and metric selection on the greenhouse gas benefits of woody biomass. Biomass- Bioenergy 44 (2012), 1–7.
39. [39] Kilpeläinen, A., Kellomäki, S., Strandman, H., Net atmospheric impacts of forest bioenergy production and utilization in Finnish boreal conditions. GCB Bioenergy 4 (2012), 811–817.
40. [40] Schlamadinger, B., Marland, G., Full fuel cycle carbon balances of bioenergy and forestry options. Energy Convers Manag 37 (1996), 813–818.
41. [41] Schlamadinger, B., Spitzer, J., Kohlmaier, G.H., Ludeke, M., Carbon balance of bioenergy from logging residues. Biomass- Bioenergy 8 (1995), 211–234.
42. [42] Zetterberg, L., Chen, D., The time aspect of bioenergy – climate impacts of solid biofuels due to carbon dynamics. GCB Bioenergy 7 (2015), 785–796.
43. [43] Ximenes, F. d A., George, B.H., Cowie, A., Williams, J., Kelly, G., Greenhouse Gas Balance of Native Forests in New South Wales, Australia. Forests 3 (2012), 653–683.
44. [44] Cintas, O., Berndes, G., Cowie, A.L., Egnell, G., Holmström, H., Ågren, G.I., The climate effect of increased forest bioenergy use in Sweden: evaluation at different spatial and temporal scales. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Energy Environ 5 (2016), 351–369.
45. [45] Cherubini, F., Bright, R.M., Strømman, A.H., Global climate impacts of forest bioenergy: what, when and how to measure?. Environ Res Lett 8 (2013), 1–12.
46. [46] Taeroe A, Mustapha W, Stupak I, Raulund-Rasmussen K. Does forests best mitigate CO2 emissions to the atmosphere by setting them aside for maiximization of carbon storage or by management for fossil fuel substitution? Journal of Environmental Management (accepted).
47. [47] Eliasson, P., Svensson, M., Olsson, M., Ågren, G.I., Forest carbon balances at the landscape scale investigated with the Q model and the CoupModel – Responses to intensified harvests. For Ecol Manag 290 (2013), 67–78.
48. [48] Lamers, P., Junginger, M., Hamelinck, C., Faaij, A., Developments in international solid biofuel trade—An analysis of volumes, policies, and market factors. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16 (2012), 3176–3199.
49. [49] Luyssaert, S., Schulze, E.D., Borner, A., Knohl, A., Hessenmoller, D., Law, B.E., et al. Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature 455 (2008), 213–215.
50. [50] Lippke, B., Oneil, E., Harrison, R., Skog, K., Gustavsson, L., Sathre, R., Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation: knowns and unknowns. Carbon Manag 2 (2011), 303–333.
51. [51] De'ath, G., Fabricius, K.E., Classification and Regression Trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81 (2000), 3178–3192.
52. [52] Thiffault, E., Béchard, A., Paré, D., Allen, D., Recovery rate of harvest residues for bioenergy in boreal and temperate forests: a review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Energy Environ 4 (2015), 429–451.
53. [53] SAS Institute Inc, JMP® 11 Specialized Models. 2014, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
54. [54] Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Stone, C.J., Olshen, R.A., Classification and Regression Trees. 1984, Chapman & Hall/CRC, London, UK.
55. [55] Holtsmark, B., Boreal forest management and its effect on atmospheric CO2. Ecol Model 248 (2013), 130–134.
56. [56] Berndes, G., Abt, B., Asikainen, A., Cowie, A., Dale, V., Egnell, G., et al. Forest biomass, carbon neutrality and climate change mitigation. 2016, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, FI.
57. [57] Hektor, B., Backéus, S., Andersson, K., Carbon balance for wood production from sustainably managed forests. Biomass- Bioenergy 93 (2016), 1–5.
58. [58] Mathiesen, B.V., Münster, M., Fruergaard, T., Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments. J Clean Prod 17 (2009), 1331–1338.
59. [59] Lund, H., Mathiesen, B.V., Christensen, P., Schmidt, J.H., Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15 (2010), 260–271.
60. [60] York, R., Do alternative energy sources displace fossil fuels?. Nat Clim Change 2 (2012), 441–443.
61. [61] Sedjo, R., Tian, X., Does wood bioenergy increase carbon stocks in Forests?. J For 110 (2012), 304–311.
62. [62] Graudal, L., Nielsen, U.B., Schou, E., Thorsen, B.J., Hansen, J.K., Bentsen, N.S., et al. The contribution of Danish forestry to increase wood production and offset climate change 2010–2100. IEA Bioenergy Task, 43, 2016.
63. [63] D'Amato, A.W., Bradford, J.B., Fraver, S., Palik, B.J., Forest management for mitigation and adaptation to climate change: insights from long-term silviculture experiments. For Ecol Manag 262 (2011), 803–816.
64. [64] Framstad, E., Wit, Hd, Mäkipää, R., Larjavaara, M., Vesterdal, L., Karltun, E., Biodiversity, carbon storage and dynamics of old northern forests. TemaNord. 2013, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, DK.
65. [65] Forest Europe. State of the Europe's Forests 2015. Madrid, ES; 2015. p. 312.
66. [66] Nabuurs, G.-J., Lindner, M., Verkerk, P.J., Gunia, K., Deda, P., Michalak, R., et al. First signs of carbon sink saturation in European forest biomass. Nat Clim Change 3 (2013), 792–796.
67. [67] Schmid, S., Thurig, E., Kaufmann, E., Lischke, H., Bugmann, H., Effect of forest management on future carbon pools and fluxes: a model comparison. For Ecol Manag 237 (2006), 65–82.
68. [68] Guest, G., Cherubini, F., Strømman, A.H., Climate impact potential of utilizing forest residues for bioenergy in Norway. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 18 (2012), 1089–1108.
69. [69] Guest, G., Bright, R.M., Cherubini, F., Strømman, A.H., Consistent quantification of climate impacts due to biogenic carbon storage across a range of bio-product systems. Environ Impact Assess Rev 43 (2013), 21–30.
70. [70] Sathre, R., Gustavsson, L., Time-dependent climate benefits of using forest residues to substitute fossil fuels. Biomass- Bioenergy 35 (2011), 2506–2516.
71. [71] Repo, A., Känkänen, R., Tuovinen, J.-P., Antikainen, R., Tuomi, M., Vanhala, P., et al. Forest bioenergy climate impact can be improved by allocating forest residue removal. GCB Bioenergy 4 (2012), 202–212.
72. [72] Haus, S., Gustavsson, L., Sathre, R., Climate mitigation comparison of woody biomass systems with the inclusion of land-use in the reference fossil system. Biomass- Bioenergy 65 (2014), 136–144.
73. [73] Joos, F., Roth, R., Fuglestvedt, J.S., Peters, G.P., Enting, I.G., von Bloh, W., et al. Carbon dioxide and climate impulse response functions for the computation of greenhouse gas metrics: a multi-model analysis. Atmos Chem Phys 13 (2013), 2793–2825.
74. [74] Kirkinen, J., Sahay, A., Savolainen, I., Greenhouse impact of fossil, forest residues and jatropha diesel: a static and dynamic assessment. Prog Ind Ecol, Int J 6 (2009), 185–206.
75. [75] Holtsmark, B., The outcome is in the assumptions: analyzing the effects on atmospheric CO2levels of increased use of bioenergy from forest biomass. GCB Bioenergy 5 (2013), 467–473.
76. [76] Ollikainen, M., Forest management, public goods and optimal policies. Annu Rev Resour Econ 8 (2016), 207–226.
77. [77] Searle, S., Malins, C., A reassessment of global bioenergy potential in 2050. GCB Bioenergy 7 (2015), 328–336.
78. [78] Gustavsson, L., Haus, S., Ortiz, C.A., Sathre, R., Le Truong, N., Climate effects of bioenergy from forest residues in comparison to fossil energy. Appl Energy 138 (2015), 36–50.
79. [79] Geden, O., The Paris Agreement and the inherent inconsistency of climate policymaking. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Clim Change 7 (2016), 790–797.
80. [80] Agostini, A., Giuntoli, J., Boulamanti, A., Carbon accounting of forest bioenergy: conclusions and recommendations from a critical literature review. Marelli, L., (eds.) Joint Research Centre, 2013, Institute for Energy and Transport, Ispra, Italy.