Global wetlands: Potential distribution, wetland loss, and status

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 586, Issue , 2017, Pages 319-327

  Hu, Shengjie ^a   Niu, Zhenguo ^a   Chen, Yanfen ^a   Li, Lifeng ^b   Zhang, Haiying ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b WWF INTERNATIONAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Global remaining wetlands; Global wetland loss; Global wetland simulation; Wetland potential distribution

Indexed keywords

REMOTE SENSING;

GLOBAL WETLAND SIMULATION; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; POTENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONS; THEMATIC MAPPING; TOPOGRAPHIC WETNESS INDEX; TRAINING SAMPLE; WETLAND ECOSYSTEM; WETLAND LOSS;

WETLANDS;

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; CONSERVATION STATUS; ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; HABITAT LOSS; HUMAN ACTIVITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; REMOTE SENSING; WETLAND;

ARTICLE; ASIA; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; EUROPE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; LAND USE; PRECIPITATION TOPOGRAPHIC WETNESS INDEX; REMOTE SENSING; WETLAND; WETLAND LOSS;

ASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 85012893776     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Arino, O., Ramos Perez, J.J., Kalogirou, V., et al. Global Land Cover Map for 2009 (GlobCover 2009). 2012.
2. Aselmann, I., Crutzen, P.J., Global distribution of natural freshwater wetlands and rice paddies, their net primary productivity, seasonality and possible methane emissions. J. Atmos. Chem. 8 (1989), 307–358.
3. Bartholomé, E., Belward, A.S., GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from earth observation data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26 (2005), 1959–1977.
4. Beven, K., Kirkby, M.J., A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrolog. Sci. J. 24 (1979), 43–69.
5. Beven, K.J., A discussion of distributed hydrological modelling. Beven, K.J., (eds.) Distributed Hydrological Modelling, 1990, Springer, Berlin, 255–278.
6. Dahl, T.E., Wetlands Losses in the United States, 1780's to 1980's. 1990, Report to the Congress, National Wetlands Inventory, St. Petersburg, FL (USA).
7. Dahl, T.E., Johnson, C.E., Status and Trends of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States, Mid-1970's to Mid-1980's. 28, 1991, US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.
8. Dahl, T.E., Status and Trends of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States 1986 to 1997. 2000, US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlif Service, Washington, DC.
9. Dahl, T.E., Status and Trends of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States 1998 to 2004. 2005, US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlif Service, Washington, DC.
10. Dahl, T.E., Status and Trends of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States 2004 to 2009. 2011, US Department of the Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Fisheries and Habitat Conservation.
11. Davidson, N.C., How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar. Freshw. Res. 65 (2014), 936–941.
12. Dugan, P., Wetland in Danger: A World Conservation Atlas. 1993, Oxford University, London, Oxford.
13. Fan, Y., Li, H., Miguezmacho, G., Global patterns of groundwater table depth. Science 339 (2013), 940–943.
14. Fan, Y., Miguezmacho, G., A simple hydrologic framework for simulating wetlands in climate and earth system models. Clim. Dynam. 37 (2010), 253–278.
15. Finlayson, C.M., Forty years of wetland conservation and wise use. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 22 (2012), 139–143.
16. Finlayson, C.M., Davidson, N.C., Spiers, A.G., et al. Global wetland inventory — current status and future priorities. Mar. Freshw. Res. 50 (1999), 717–727.
17. Friedl, M.A., McIver, D.K., Hodges, J.C., et al. Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results. Remote Sens. Environ. 83 (2002), 287–302.
18. Giri, C., Zhu, Z., Reed, B., A comparative analysis of the Global Land Cover 2000 and MODIS land cover data sets. Remote Sens. Environ. 94 (2005), 123–132.
19. Gong, P., Wang, J., Yu, L., et al. Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM + data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 34 (2012), 2607–2654.
20. Grabs, T., Seibert, J., Bishop, K., et al. Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: a comparison of the topographic wetness index and a dynamic distributed model. J. Hydrol. 373 (2009), 15–23.
21. Gumbricht, T., Mapping global tropical wetlands from earth observing satellite imagery. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), 2012, Indonesia, Bogor.
22. Herold, M., Mayaux, P., Woodcock, C.E., et al. Some challenges in global land cover mapping: an assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets. Remote Sens. Environ. 112 (2008), 2538–2556.
23. Hess, L.L., Melack, J.M., Affonso, A.G., et al. Wetlands of the lowland Amazon basin: extent, vegetative cover, and dual-season inundated area as mapped with JERS-1 synthetic aperture radar. Wetlands 35 (2015), 745–756.
24. Homer, C.G., Dewitz, J.A., Yang, L., et al. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States-representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogramm. Eng. Remote. Sens. 81 (2015), 345–354.
25. Infascelli, R., Faugno, S., Pindozzi, S., et al. Testing different topographic indexes to predict wetlands distribution. Procedia Environ. Sci. 19 (2013), 733–746.
26. Jung, M., Henkel, K., Herold, M., et al. Exploiting synergies of global land cover products for carbon cycle modeling. Remote Sens. Environ. 101 (2006), 534–553.
27. Köppen, W., Geiger, R., Handbuch der klimatologie. 1930, Gebrüder Borntraeger Berlin, Germany.
28. Lehner, B., Döll, P., Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands. J. Hydrol. 296 (2004), 1–22.
29. Loveland, T., Reed, B., Brown, J., et al. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 21 (2000), 1303–1330.
30. Matthews, E., Fung, I., Methane emission from natural wetlands: global distribution, area, and environmental characteristics of sources. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 1 (1987), 61–86.
31. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, M.E.A, Ecosystems and Human Well Being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis. 2005, Washington, DC, USA, Water Resources Institute.
32. Merot, P., Squividant, H., Aurousseau, P., et al. Testing a climato-topographic index for predicting wetlands distribution along an European climate gradient. Ecol. Model. 163 (2003), 51–71.
33. Mitra, S., Wassmann, R., Vlek, P., Global inventory of wetlands and their role in the carbon cycle. Discus. Pap., 18771, 2003.
34. Moser, M., Prentice, C., Frazier, S., A global overview of wetland loss and degradation. Technical Session B of the 6th Ramsar COP, 1996, Brisbane, Wetlands International.
35. Murphy, P.N., Ogilvie, J., Connor, K., et al. Mapping wetlands: a comparison of two different approaches for New Brunswick, Canada. Wetlands 27 (2007), 846–854.
36. Nakaegawa, T., Comparison of water-related land cover types in six 1-km global land cover datasets. J. Hydrometeorol. 13 (2012), 649–664.
37. Navid, D., International law of migratory species: the Ramsar convention. Dokl. Earth Sci. 455 (2014), 296–298.
38. Niu, Z.G., Zhang, H.Y., Wang, X.W., et al. Mapping wetland changes in China between 1978 and 2008. Chin. Sci. Bull. 57 (2012), 2813–2823.
39. OECD, Development Assistance Committee Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Guidelines for aid agencies for improved conservation and sustainable use of tropical and sub-tropical wetlands. 1996.
40. Prigent, C., Papa, F., Aires, F., et al. Global inundation dynamics inferred from multiple satellite observation, 1993-2000. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 112 (2007), 1103–1118.
41. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Wetlands values and functions. Ramsar Convention Bureau. Gland, Switzerland. 2001.
42. Rodhe, A., Seibert, J., Wetland occurrence in relation to topography: a test of topographic indices as moisture indicators. Agric. For. Meteorol. 98 (1999), 325–340.
43. Russi, D., Brink, P.T., Badura, T., et al. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Water and Wetlands. 2013, IEEP, London and Brussels.
44. Shaw, S.P., Fredine, C.G., Wetlands of the United States: Their Extent and their Value to Waterfowl and Other Wildlife. 1956.
45. Soukup, T., Büttner, G., Feranec, J., et al. CORINE Land Cover 2012 (CLC2012). European Landscape Dynamics. 2016, CRC Press, 93–99.
46. Stehman, S.V., Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sens. Environ. 62 (1997), 77–89.
47. Taylor, A.R.D., Howard, G.W., Begg, G.W., Developing wetland inventories in southern Africa: a review. Plant Ecol. 118 (1995), 57–79.
48. Tuanmu, M.N., Jetz, W., A global 1-km consensus land-cover product for biodiversity and ecosystem modelling. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23 (2014), 1031–1045.
49. Wania, R., Melton, J.R., Hodson, E.L., et al. Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: methodology of a model intercomparison project (WETCHIMP). Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. 5 (2012), 4071–4136.
50. Zhao, Y., Gong, P., Yu, L., et al. Towards a common validation sample set for global land-cover mapping. Int. J. Remote Sens. 35 (2014), 4795–4814.
51. Zheng, Y.M., Niu, Z.G., Gong, P., et al. A database of global wetland validation samples for wetland mapping. Chin. Sci. Bull. 60 (2015), 428–434.
52. Zhu, P., Gong, P., Suitability mapping of global wetland areas and validation with remotely sensed data. Sci. China Earth Sci. 57 (2014), 2283–2292.