Testing a climato-topographic index for predicting wetlands distribution along an European climate gradient

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 163, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 51-71

  Merot, Ph ^a   Squividant, H ^a   Aurousseau, P ^a   Hefting, M ^b   Burt, T ^c   Maitre, V ^d   Kruk, M ^e   Butturini, A ^f   Thenail, C ^a   Viaud, V ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d EPFL   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WARMIA AND MAZURY IN OLSZTYN   (Poland)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Europe; Topographic index; Wetland

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; PREDICTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TOPOGRAPHY; WETLAND;

EUROPE;

EID: 0037405318     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00387-3     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aurousseau, P., Squividant, H., 1995. Rôle environnemental et identification cartographique des sols hydromorphes de bas fonds. Ingénieries EAT, no. spécial Rade de Brest, pp. 75-85.
2. Aurousseau, P., Squividant, H., 1996. Raffinement des techniques d'estimation spatiale ou de modélisation spatiale du réseau hydrographique et des zones hydromorphes de bas-fonds par intégration de données climatologiques: les pluies efficaces. UMR INRA ENSA SAS, Rennes, note interne, p. 8.
3. Aurousseau, P., Squividant, H. 1997. Correction of Digital Elevation Models using drainage pattern constraints. http://viviane.roazhon.inra.fr/spanum/publica/contrain/contrain.htm.
4. Beaujouan, V., Aurousseau, P., Durand, P., Squividant, H., Ruiz, L., 2000. Comparaison de méthodes de définition des chemins hydrauliques pour la modélisation hydraulique à l'échelle du bassin versant. Rev. Int. Géomat. 10, 39-60.
5. Beaujouan, V., Durand, P., Ruiz, L., 2001. Modelling the effect of the spatial distribution of agricultural practices on nitrogen fluxes in rural catchments. Ecol. Model. 137, 93-105.
6. Bernard, P., 1994. Les zones humides; rapport d'évaluation. Comité interministériel de l'évaluation des politiques publiques. Commissariat au Plan. La Documentation Française, p. 391.
7. Beven, K., 1986. Runoff production and flood frequency in catchment of order n: an alternative approach. In: Gupta, V., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Wood, E. (Eds.), Scale Problem in Hydrology. Reidel, Norwell, MA, pp. 107-132.
8. Beven, K.J., Kirkby, M.J., 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 24, 43-69.
9. Beven, K.J., Wood, E.F., 1983. Catchment geomorphology and the dynamics of runoff contributing areas. J. Hydrol. 65, 139-158.
10. Beven, K.J., Kirkby, M.J., Schoffield, N., Tagg, A., 1984. Testing a physically-based flood forecasting model (TOPMODEL) for three UK catchments. J. Hydrol. 69, 119-143.
11. Bruneau, P., Gascuel-Odoux, C., Robin, P., Merot, Ph., Beven, K., 1995. Sensitivity to space and time resolution of a hydrological model using digital elevation data. Hydrol. Process. 9, 69-81.
12. Burt, T.P., 1997. The hydrological role of floodplains within the drainage basin system. In: Haycock, N.E., Burt, T., Goulding, K., Pinay, G. (Eds.), Buffer Zones: Their Processes and Potential in Water Protection. Quest Environmental, Harpenden, pp. 21-32.
13. Burt, T.P., 2001. Integrated management of sensitive catchment systems. Catena 42, 275-290.
14. Burt, T.P., Butcher, D.P., 1985. Topographic control of soil moisture distribution. J. Soil Sci. 36, 469-486.
15. Cappus, P., 1960. Etude des lois de l'écoulement. Application au calcul et à la prévision des débits. Bassin experimental d'Alrance. La Houille Blanche 60, 493-520.
16. Correl, D.L., 1996. Buffer zones and water quality protection: general principles. In: Haycock, N.E., Burt, T., Goulding, K., Pinay, G. (Eds.), Buffer Zones: Their Processes and Potential in Water Protection. Quest Environmental, Harpenden, pp. 7-20.
17. Crave, A., Gascuel-Odoux, C., 1997. The influence of topography on time and space distribution of soil surface water content. Hydrol. Process. 11, 203-210.
18. Depraetere, C., 1991. LAMONT-Logiciel d'Application des Modèles Numériques de Terrain, Technical Report of Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Développement en Coopération-Notice OVNIh du laboratoire d'hydrologie #4.
19. Dillaha, T.A., Inamdar, S.P., 1996. Buffer zones as sediment traps or sources. In: Haycock, N.E., Burt, T., Goulding, K., Pinay, G. (Eds.), Buffer Zones: Their Processes and Potential in Water Protection. Quest Environmental, Harpenden, pp. 33-42.
20. Durand, P., Gascuel-Odoux, C., Kao, C., Merot, Ph., 2000. Une typologie hydrologique des petites zones humides ripariennes. Etude et Gestion des Sols 7, 207-218.
21. Fustec, E., Greiner, I., Schanen, O., Gailard, S., Dzana, J.-G., 1998. Les zones humides riveraines: des milieux divers aux multiples fonctions. In: Meybeck, M., De Marsily, G., Fustec, E. (Eds.), la Seine en son Bassin. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 211-262.
22. Gascuel-Odoux, C., Merot, Ph., Crave, A., Gineste, P., Taha, A., Zhang, Z., 1998. Les zones contributives de fond de vallée: localisation, structure et fonctionnement hydrodynamique. In: Cheverry, C. (Ed.), Agriculture Intensive et Qualité des Eaux, Coll. Science Update, INRA éd., pp. 129-142.
23. Gilliam, J.W., Parsons, J.E., Mikkelsen, R.L., 1997. Nitrogen dynamics and buffer zones. In: Haycock, N.E., Burt, T., Goulding, K., Pinay, G. (Eds.), Buffer Zones: Their Processes and Potential in Water Protection. Quest Environmental, Hartfordshire, UK, pp. 54-61.
24. Gold, A.J., Groffman, P.M., Addy, K., Kellogg, D.Q., Stolt, M., Rosenblatt, A.E., 2001. Landscape attributes as controls on ground water nitrate removal capacity of riparian zones. J. Am. Water Res. Assoc. 37, 1457-1464.
25. Grayson, R., Blöschl, G., 2001. Spatial Patterns in Catchment Hydrology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 416.
26. Güntner, A., Uhlenbrook, S., Seibert, J., Leibundgut, C., 1999. Estimation of saturation excess overland flow areas - comparison of topographic index calculations with field mapping. In: Diekkrüger, B., Kirkby, M., Schröder, U. (Eds.), Regionalization in Hydrology. IAHS Publication, Oxfordshire, UK, 254, 203-210.
27. Haury, J., Merot, Ph., Rivière, J.M., 1990. Under utilisation and intensification in two Brittany wetlands. Third INTECOL conference. Bull. Ecol. 21, 61-64.
28. Hewlett, J.D., 1961. Soil moisture as a source of base flow from steep mountain watersheds. US Department of Agriculture, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC. Station, paper no. 132, p. 11.
29. Hewlett, J.D., Troendle, C.A., 1975. Non-point and diffuse water sources: a variable source area problem in irrigation and drainage symposium. ASCE, Logan, August 1975. Watershed Management, p. 46.
30. Holmgren, P., 1994. Multiple flow direction algorithms for runoff modelling in grid based elevation models: an empirical evaluation. Hydrol. Process. 8, 327-334.
31. Kirkby, M.J., Kneale, P.E., Lewis, S.L., Smith, R.T., 1995. Modelling the form and distribution of peat mires. In: Hugues, M.R., Heathwaite, A.L. (Eds.), Hydrology and Hydrochemistry of British Wetlands. Wiley, New York, pp. 83-93.
32. Kruk, M., 1996. Biogeochemical consequences of watershed inflow of mineral elements into fens in agricultural landscape. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 22, 105-127.
33. Kruk, M., 1997. Effect of draining on nitrogen flow through mires in agricultural landscape. Ekol. Pol. 45, 441-460.
34. Merot, Ph., 2000. Ty-Fon: typologie fonctionnelle des zones humides de fond de vallée en vue de la régulation de la pollution diffuse. Rapport de synthèse final programme PNRZH; INRA, Rennes, p. 115.
35. Merot, Ph., Bruneau, P., 1993. Sensitivity of bocage landscapes to surface run-off: application of the Kirkby index. Hydrol. Process. 7, 167-176.
36. Merot, Ph., Durand, P., 1997. Modelling the interaction between buffer zones and the catchment. In: Haycock, N.E., Burt, T., Goulding, K., Pinay, G. (Eds.), Buffer Zones: Their Processes and Potential in Water Protection. Quest Environmental, Harpenden, UK, pp. 208-217.
37. Merot, Ph., Ezzahar, B., Walter, C., Aurousseau, P., 1995. Mapping waterlogging of soils using digital terrain models. Hydrol. Process. 9, 27-34.
38. Mitsch, W.J., Gosselink, J.G., 1993. Wetlands, 2nd ed. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, p. 722.
39. Naiman, R.J., Décamps, H., 1990. The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones. Man and Biosphere series 4. UNESCO Paris and the Parthenon Pub. Group., p. 316.
40. Oberlin, G., 2000. Le contrôle des crues. In: Fustec, E., Lefeuvre, J.-C. (Eds.), Fonctions et Valeurs des Zones Humides. Ed Dunod, Paris, pp. 83-105.
41. O'Loughlin, E.M., 1986. Prediction of surface saturation zones in natural catchments by topographic analysis. Water Resour. Res. 22, 794-804.
42. Pinay, G., Burt, T., 2000. NICOLAS; nitrogen control by landscape structures. Final report, research project 97-00. ENV4-CT-0395. E.C. DG XII, p. 130.
43. Quinn, P., Beven, K., 1993. Spatial and temporal predictions of soil moisture dynamics, runoff, variable source areas and evapotranspiration for Plinlimon, Mid-Wales. Hydrol. Process. 5, 59-79.
44. Quinn, P., Beven, P., Chevalier, P., Planchon, O., 1991. The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrol. Process. 5, 59-79.
45. Quinn, P., Beven, K., Lamb, R., 1995. The ln(a/tan b) index: how to calculate it and how to use it within the topmodel framework. Hydrol. Process. 9, 161-182.
46. Rivest, J.F., Soille, P., Beucher, S., 1993. Morphological gradients. J. Electron. Imag. 2, 326-336.
47. Rohde, A., Seibert, J., 1999. Wetland occurrence in relation to topography: a test of topographic indices as moisture indicators. Agric. For. Meteorol. 98/99, 325-340.
48. Saulnier, G.-M., 1996. Information pédologique spatialisée et traitements topographiques améliorés dans la modélisation hydrologique par Top-Model. Thèse Institut Nat. Polytech. Grenoble, p. 300.
49. Smart, R.P., Soulsby, C., Cresser, M.S., Wade, A.J., Townend, J., Billett, M.F., Langan, S., 2001. Riparian zone influence on stream water chemistry at different spatial scales: a GIS-based modelling approach, an example for the Dee, NE, Scotland. Sci. Total Environ. 280, 173-193.
50. Soille, P., 1999. Morphological Image Analysis. Principle and Applications. Springer, Berlin.
51. Squividant, H., 1994. Mntsurf: logiciel de traitement des modèles numériques de terrain. Technical report, Doc ENSAR, p. 36.
52. Tarboton, D.G., Bras, R.L., Rodriguez Iturbe, I., 1991. On the extraction channel networks from digital elevation data. Hydrol. Process. 5, 81-100.
53. Thompson, J.C., Moore, R.D., 1996. Relations between topography and water table depth in a shallow forest soil. Hydrol. Process. 10, 1513-1525.
54. Turcotte, R., Fortin, J.P., Rousseau, A.N., Massicote, S., Villeneuve, J.P., 2001. Determination of the drainage structure of a watershed using a digital elevation model and a digital river and lake network. J. Hydrol. 240, 225-242.
55. Ward, R.C., 1982. The fountains of the deep and the windows of heaven: perplexity and progress in explaining the response of rivers to precipitation. University of Hull, p. 30.
56. Wharton, G., 1994. Progress in the use of drainage network indices for rainfall-runoff modelling and runoff prediction. Progr. Phys. Geogr. 18, 539-557.
57. Wolock, D.M., McCabe, G.J., 1995. Comparison of single and multiple flow-direction algorithms for computing topographic parameters in TOPMODEL. Water Resour. Res. 31, 1315-1324.