Commentary: What is the case for candidate gene approaches in the era of high-throughput genomics? A response to Border and Keller (2017)

Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 331-334

  Moore, Sarah R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b BC CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PHENOTYPE; TOUCH; MENTAL DISEASE;

GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 85012872781     PISSN: 00219630     EISSN: 14697610     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12697     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Border, R., & Keller, M.C. (2017). Commentary: Fundamental problems with candidate gene-by-environment interaction studies – reflections on Moore and Thoemmes (2016). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58, 328–330.
2. Hyde, C.L., Nagle, M.W., Tian, C., Chen, X., Paciga, S.A., Wendland, J.R., … & Winslow, A.R. (2016). Identification of 15 genetic loci associated with risk of major depression in individuals of European descent. Nature Genetics, 48, 1031–1036.
3. Klahr, A.M., Klump, K., & Burt, S.A. (2015). A constructive replication of the association between the oxytocin receptor genotype and parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 91–99.
4. Lehner, B. (2013). Genotype to phenotype: Lessons from model organisms for human genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 14, 168–178.
5. Lewontin, R.C. (1974). Annotation: The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. American Journal of Human Genetics, 26, 400–411.
6. Matsui, T., Ehrenreich, I.M., Mackay, T., Stone, E., Ayroles, J., Baye, T., … & Hunter, S. (2016). Gene–environment interactions in stress response contribute additively to a genotype–environment interaction. PLOS Genetics, 12, e1006158.
7. Paus, T., Keshavan, M., & Giedd, J.N. (2010). Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 947–957.
8. Zannas, A.S., Wiechmann, T., Gassen, N.C., & Binder, E.B. (2016). Gene–stress–epigenetic regulation of FKBP5: Clinical and translational implications. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41, 261–274.
9. Zuk, O., Hechter, E., Sunyaev, S.R., & Lander, E.S. (2012). The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 1193–1198.