Stewards of a public trust: Responsible transplantation

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2003, Pages V-Vii

  Fox, Mark D ^a,b  

^a University of Oklahoma Tulsa College of Medicine   (United States)

^b UNO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BRAIN DEATH; DONOR; ETHICS; GIFT GIVING; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; NOTE; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TRANSPLANTATION; TRUST;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

BRAIN DEATH; GIFT GIVING; HUMANS; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS; TRUST;

EID: 85012434473     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651603321611773     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Dudzinski, D. M. 2003. Does the respect for donor rule respect the donor? The American Journal of Bioethics 3(1):23–24.
2. Kluge, E.-H. 1989. Designated organ donation: Private choice in social context. Hastings Center Report 19(5):10–16.
3. Koppelman, E. R. 2003. The dead donor rule and the concept of death: Severing the ties that bind them. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(1):1–9.
4. Siminoff, L.A. 2003. The dead donor rule: Not dead yet. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(1):30
5. Spielman, B. 2003. Surrogates and respect for donors. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(1):18–19.
6. Task Force on Organ Transplantation. 1986. Organ transplantation: Issues and recommendations Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration. Winter