Does the respect for donor rule respect the donor?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 23-

  Dudzinski, Denise M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; DECISION MAKING; DONOR; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; LIVING WILL; NOTE; PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; TRANSPLANTATION;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 0642277685     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651603321611872     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Dudzinski, D. 2001. The phenomenology of integrity: An essay in clinical ethics. Ph.D. diss., Department of Religion, Vanderbilt University.
2. Koppelman, E. R. 2003. The dead donor rule and the concept of death: Severing the ties that bind them. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(1):1–9.
3. Menikoff, J. 2003.Why being alive matters. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(1):21–22.
4. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington: GPO