Cost effectiveness of a novel attempt to reduce readmission after ileostomy creation

Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Raza, Ahsan ^a   Iqbal, Atif ^a   Huang, Emina ^b   Goldstein, Lindsey ^a   Hughes, Steven J ^a   Tan, Sanda A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dehydration; Ileostomy; Readmission

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COUNSELING; DEHYDRATION; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; FLORIDA; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TELEMEDICINE; TELEPHONE;

CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COUNSELING; DEHYDRATION; FEMALE; FLORIDA; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT READMISSION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; TELEMEDICINE; TELEPHONE;

EID: 85012303385     PISSN: 10868089     EISSN: 19383797     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00082     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Roland M, Campbell S. Successes and failures of pay for performance in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2014;370: 1944–1949.
2. Paquette IM, Solan P, Rafferty JF, Ferguson MA, Davis BR. Readmission for dehydration or renal failure after ileostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:974–979.
3. Tyler JA, Fox JP, Dharmarajan S, et al. Acute health care resource utilization for ileostomy patients is higher than expected. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:1412–1420.
4. Messaris E, Sehgal R, Deiling S, et al. Dehydration is the most common indication for readmission after diverting ileostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:175–180.
5. Nagle D, Pare T, Keenan E, Marcet K, Tizio S, Poylin V. Ileostomy pathway virtually eliminates readmissions for dehydration in new ostomates. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:1266–1272.
6. Brédart A, Bottomley A, Blazeby JM, et al. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group and Quality of Life Unit: an international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32). Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:2120–2131.
7. Datta I, Buie WD, Maclean AR, Heine JA. Hospital readmission rates after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:55–58.
8. Chun LJ, Haigh PI, Tam MS, Abbas MA. Defunctioning loop ileostomy for pelvic anastomoses: predictors of morbidity and nonclosure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:167–174.
9. Garcia-Botello SA, Garcia-Armengol J, Garcia-Granero E, et al. A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown. Dig Surg. 2004;21:440–446.
10. Okamoto T, Kusunoki M, Kusuhara K, Yamamura T, Utsunomiya J. Water and electrolyte balance after ileal J pouch anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10:33–38.
11. Tsao SK, Baker M, Nightingale JM. High-output stoma after small-bowel resections for Crohn’s disease. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;2:604–608.