Hospital readmission rates after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 55-58

  Datta, Indraneel ^a   Buie, W Donald ^a   MacLean, Anthony R ^a   Heine, John A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b 1004 8th Avenue SE ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

Complications; Hospital readmission; Ileal pouch anal anastomosis; Surgery; Ulcerative colitis

Indexed keywords

STEROID;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEHYDRATION; DISEASE DURATION; DRUG USE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ENTEROCUTANEOUS FISTULA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; ILEOSTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PORTAL VEIN THROMBOSIS; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; SCORING SYSTEM; SEPSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMALL INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; WOUND DEHISCENCE; COLON POUCH; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; COLONIC POUCHES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT READMISSION; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 64049111065     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819724a3     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. BMJ 1978;2:85-8.
2. Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 1995;222:120-7.
3. Meagher AP, Farouk R, Dozois RR, et al. J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients. Br J Surg 1998;85:800-3.
4. Pemberton JH, Kelly KA, Beart RW Jr, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results. Ann Surg 1987;206:504-13.
5. Poppen B, Svenberg T, Bark T, et al. Colectomy-proctomucosectomy with S-pouch: operative procedures, complications, and functional outcome in 69 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:40-7.
6. McMullen K, Hicks T, Ray J, et al. Complications associated with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg 1991;15: 763-6.
7. Skarsgard ED, Atkinson KG, Bell GA, et al. Function and quality of life results after ileal pouch surgery for chronic ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis. Am J Surg 1989;157:467-71.
8. Oresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, et al. The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4: 50-6.
9. Nicholls RJ, Holt SD, Lubowski DZ. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir. Comparison of two-stage vs. threestage procedures and analysis of factors that might affect outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:323-6.
10. Nyam DC, Brillant PT, Dozois RR, et al. Ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: early and late results. Ann Surg 1997;226:514-9.
11. Belliveau P, Trudel J, Vasilevsky CA, et al. Ileoanal anastomosis with reservoirs: complications and long-term results. Can J Surg 1999;42:345-53.
12. Heuschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, et al. Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 2002; 235:207-16.
13. Vasilevsky CA, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. The S ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg 1987;11:742-50.
14. Young CJ, Solomon MJ, Eyers AA, et al. Evolution of the pelvic pouch procedure at one institution: the first 100 cases. ANZ J Surg 1999;69:438-42.
15. Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronatebased bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183: 297-306.
16. Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ Jr, et al. Long-term results of the ileoanal pouch procedure. Arch Surg 1993; 128:500-3.
17. Francois Y, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, et al. Small intestinal obstruction complicating ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1989;209:46-50.
18. Galandiuk S, Pemberton JH, Tsao J, et al. Delayed ileal pouchanal anastomosis. Complications and functional results. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:755-8.
19. MacLean AR, Cohen Z, MacRae HM, et al. Risk of small bowel obstruction after the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 2002;235:200-6.
20. Fazio VW, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, et al. Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49: 1-11.
21. Azimuddin K, Rosen L, Reed JF 3rd, et al. Readmissions after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:942-6.
22. Snow N, Bergin KT, Horrigan TP. Readmission of patients to the surgical intensive care unit: patient profiles and possibilities for prevention. Crit Care Med 1985;13:961-4.
23. Kariv Y, Wang W, Senagore AJ, et al. Multivariable analysis of factors associated with hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. Am J Surg 2006;191:364-71.
24. Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, et al. Outcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:877-83.
25. Sugerman HJ, Sugerman EL, Meador JG, et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion. Ann Surg 2000;232: 530-41.
26. Swenson BR, Hollenbeak CS, Koltun WA. Hospital costs and risk factors associated with complications of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Surgery 2002;132:767-73.