Using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine product usability: A test case

Work

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 21-29

  Zhou, Ronggang ^a   Chan, Alan H S ^b  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

analytic hierarchy process (AHP); fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; Usability

Indexed keywords

AVERAGING; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MONTE CARLO METHOD; RELIABILITY; SOFTWARE; UNCERTAINTY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION STUDY; FUZZY LOGIC; HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARDS;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; FUZZY LOGIC; HUMANS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85012124650     PISSN: 10519815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-162473     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Zhou RG, Chan AHS. Using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine product usability: A proposed theoretical framework. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation 2017;56(1):9-19.
2. ISO W. 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). The International Organization for Standardization 1998;45.
3. Lewis JR. IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 1995;7(1):57-78.
4. Lewis JR. Psychometric evaluationofthe PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2002;14(3-4):463-88.
5. Vredenburg K, Isensee S, Righi C. User-Centered Design: An Integrated Approach. Prentice Hall: New Jersey. 2001.
6. Nielsen J. Usability engineering. 1st ed. Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco; 1993.
7. Barnum CM. Usability Testing and Research. Longman Publications: New York; 2002.
8. Rubin J, Chisnell D. Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design and conduct effective tests. John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
9. Tullis T, Albert B. Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics 2nd ed. Morgan Kaufmann Publisher Inc: San Fransisco; 2013.
10. Ying-Feng K, Ling-Show C. Using the fuzzy synthetic decision approach to assess the performance of university teachers in Taiwan. International Journal of Management 2002;19(4):593.
11. Lewis JR. Evaluation of procedures for adjusting problem-discovery rates estimated from small samples. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2001;13(4): 445-79.
12. Sauro J, Lewis JR. Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Elsevier; 2012.
13. Sauro J, Kindlund E. A method to standardize usability metrics into a single score. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM Press: New York; 2005. pp. 401-409.
14. Hsiao SW, Chou JR. A Gestalt-like perceptual measure for home page design using a fuzzy entropy approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2006;64(2): 137-56.
15. Mitta DA. An application of the analytic hierarchy process: A rank-ordering of computer interfaces. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 1993;35(1):141-57.
16. Freire LL, Arezes PM, Campos JC. A literature review about usability evaluation methods for e-learning platforms. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation 2012;41(Suppl 1):1038-44.
17. Friesen EL, Theodoros D, Russell TG. Usability-for-one. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation 2015;52(1):211-3.