Associations between Internet Attachment, Cyber Victimization, and Internalizing Symptoms among Adolescents

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 91-96

  Holfeld, Brett ^a   Sukhawathanakul, Paweena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adolescence; Cyber victimization; Internalizing symptoms; Internet attachment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; ADOLESCENT; ANXIETY; AWARENESS; CHILD; HUMAN; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENT; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; SYMPTOM; BULLYING; CRIME VICTIM; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; BULLYING; CHILD; CRIME VICTIMS; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; STUDENTS;

EID: 85012108427     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0194     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Lenhart A. (2015) Teen, social media and technology overview 2015 (PewResearch CenterReport 202.419.4372).www .pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015 (accessed March 1, 2016).
2. Cho S, Sung M, Shin K, et al. Does psychopathology in childhood predict internet addiction in male adolescents? Child Psychiatry & Human Development 2013; 44:549-555.
3. Kelleci M, Inal S. Psychiatric symptoms in adolescents with Internet use: comparison without Internet use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2010; 13:191-194.
4. Van Den Eijnden RJ, Meerkerk GJ, Vermulst AA, et al. Online communication, compulsive internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 2008; 44:655-665.
5. Hemphill SA, Kotevksi A, Heerde JA. Longitudinal associations between cyber-bullying perpetration and victimization and problem behavior and mental health problems in young Australians. Int J Public Health 2015;60:227-237.
6. Modecki KL, Barber BL, Vernon L, et al. Mapping developmental precursors of cyber-aggression: trajectories of risk predict perpetration and victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2013; 42:651-661.
7. Nixon CL. Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics 2014; 5:143-158.
8. Vandebosch H, Van Cleemput K. Cyberbullying among youngsters: profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society 2009; 11:1349-1371.
9. Rose CA, Tynes BM. Longitudinal associations between cybervictimization and mental health among U.S. adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health 2015; 57:1-8.
10. Peluchette JV, Karl K, Wood C, et al. Cyberbullying victimization: do victims' personality and risky social network behaviors contribute to the problem? Computers in Human Behavior 2015; 52:424-435.
11. Guan SSA, Subrahmanyam K. Youth internet use: risks and opportunities. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 2009; 22:351-356.
12. Meerkerk GJ, Van Den Eijnden RJ, Vermulst AA, et al. The compulsive internet use scale (CIUS): some psychometric properties. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2009; 12:1-6.
13. Coté JE, Levine CG. (2014) Identity, formation, agency, and culture: a social psychological synthesis. Psychology Press.
14. Valkenburg PM, Peter J, Schouten AP. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2006; 9:584-590.
15. Cummings CM, Caporino NE, Kendall PC. Comorbidity of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: 20 years after. Psychological Bulletin 2014; 140:816-845.
16. Holfeld B, Leadbeater BJ. The nature and frequency of cyber bullying behaviors and victimization experiences among young Canadian children. Canadian Journal of School Psychology 2015; 30:116-135.
17. Tokunaga RS. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior 2010; 26:277-287.
18. Kowalski RM, Giumetti GW, Schroeder AN, et al. Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin 2014; 140:1073-1137.
19. Patchin JW, Hinduja S. (2012). Cyberbullying: an update and synthesis on the research. In Patchin JW, Hinduja S, eds. Cyberbullying prevention and response: expert perspectives. New York: Routledge, pp. 13-36.
20. Mishna F, Khoury-Kassabri M, Gadalla T, et al. Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: victims, bullies, and bully/victims. Children and Youth Services Review 2012; 34:63-70.
21. Africak T, Siyahhan S, Uzunhasanoglu A, et al. Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2008; 11:253-261.
22. Erdur-Baker O. Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools.NewMedia&Society 2010; 12:109-125.
23. Holfeld B. Perceptions and attributions of bystanders to cyber bullying.Computers inHuman Behavior, 2014; 38:1-7.
24. Mishna F, Cook C, Gadalla T, et al. Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 2010; 80:362-374.
25. Gámez-Guadix M, Orue I, Smith PK, et al. Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic internet use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health 2013; 53:446-452.
26. Lu HY. Sensation-seeking, Internet dependency, and online interpersonal deception. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2008; 11:227-231.
27. Patchin JW, Hinduja S. Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of School Health 2010; 80:614-621.
28. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. (2009) Bullying beyond the schoolyard: preventing and responding to cyber bullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
29. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. (1995) Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation Monograph.
30. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 2005; 44:227-239.
31. Campbell MA, Slee PT, Spears B, et al. Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies' perceptions of the harm they cause to others and their own mental health. School Psychology International 2013; 34:613-629.
32. Muthen LK, Muthen BO. (1998-2012). Mplus user's guide. Seventh Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
33. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999; 6:1-55.
34. Kline RB. (2005) Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35. Weiser EB. Gender differences in Internet use patterns and internet application preferences: a two-sample comparison. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2000; 3:167-178.
36. Meter DJ, Bauman S. When sharing is a bad idea: the effects of online social network engagement and sharing passwords with friends on cyberbullying involvement. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2015; 18: 437-442.
37. Gámez-Guadix M, Borrajo E, Almendros C. Risky online behaviors among adolescents: longitudinal relations among problematic internet use, cyberbullying perpetration, and meeting strangers online. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 2016; 5:100-107.
38. Shapka JD, Law DM. Does one size fit all? Ethnic differences in parenting behaviors and motivations for adolescent engagement in cyberbullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2013; 42:723-738.