The influence of particulated autogenous bone on the early volume stability of maxillary sinus grafts with biphasic calcium phosphate: A randomized clinical trial

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 173-178

  Kühl, Sebatian ^a,b   Payer, Michael ^b   Kirmeier, Robert ^b   Wildburger, Angelika ^b   Acham, Stephan ^b   Jakse, Norbert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bone replacement materials; Maxillary sinus floor augmentation; Volume stability

Indexed keywords

BONE PROSTHESIS; HYDROXYAPATITE; HYDROXYAPATITE-BETA TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE; TOOTH IMPLANT;

BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; PHARMACOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; SOFTWARE; SURGERY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

BONE SUBSTITUTES; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROXYAPATITES; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85012076783     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12086     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980; 38:613-616.
2. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24:565-577.
3. Jensen T, Schou S, Stavropoulos A, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:263-273.
4. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35:216-240.
5. Nkenke E, Stelzle F. Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmentation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:124-133.
6. Schmitt CM, Doering H, Schmidt T, Lutz R, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA. Histological results after maxillary sinus augmentation with Straumann®BoneCeramic, Bio-Oss®, Puros®, and autologous bone. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 24:576-585.
7. Nkenke E, Weisbach V, Winckler E, etal. Morbidity of harvesting of bone grafts from the iliac crest for preprosthetic augmentation procedures: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33:157-163.
8. Kahnberg KE, Wallstrom M, Rasmusson L. Local sinus lift for single-tooth implant. I. Clinical and radiographic follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13:231-237.
9. Tetsch J, Tetsch P, Lysek DA. Long-term results after lateral and osteotome technique sinus floor elevation: a retrospective analysis of 2190 implants over a time period of 15 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21:497-503.
10. Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, Soejima Y. Measurement of maxillary sinus volume using computerized tomographic images. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13:811-818.
11. Sbordone C, Sbordone L, Toti P, Martuscelli R, Califano L, Guidetti F. Volume changes of grafted autogenous bone in sinus augmentation procedure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69:1633-1641.
12. Artzi Z, Kozlovski A, Nemcovsky CE, Weinreb M. The amount of newly formed bone in sinus grafting procedures depends on tissue depth as well as the type and residual amount of the grafted material. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32:193-199.
13. Esposito M, Grusovin M, Worthington H, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (1):CD003607.
14. Szabo G, Huys L, Coulthard P, etal. A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial of autogenous bone versus beta-tricalcium phosphate graft alone for bilateral sinus elevation: histologic and histomorphometric evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20:371-381.
15. Covani U, Orlando B, Giacomelli L, Cornelini R, Barone A. Implant survival after sinus elevation with Straumann® BoneCeramic in clinical practice: ad-interim results of a prospective study at a 15-month follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:481-484.
16. Kühl S, Brochhausen C, Götz H, etal. The influence of bone substitute materials on the bone volume after maxillary sinus augmentation: a microcomputerized tomography study. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17:543-551.
17. Lindgren C, Mordenfeld A, Hallman M. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate or deproteinized bovine bone. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:41-50.
18. Kent JN, Bloch MS. Simultaneous maxillary sinus floor bone grafting and placement of hydroxyapatite-coated implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 47:238-242.
19. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Wegscheider W, etal. Retrospective analysis of Frialit-2 implants in the augmented sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20:255-267.
20. Kühl S, Payer M, Kirmeier R, Wildburger A, Wegscheider W, Jakse N. The influence of bone marrow aspirates and concentrates on the early volume stability of maxillary sinus grafts with deproteinized bovine bone mineral-First results of a RCT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013. doi: 10.1111/clr.12101
21. Klijn RJ, van den Beucken JJJP, Bronkhorst EM, Berge SJ, Meijer GJ, Jansen JA. Predictive value of ridge dimensions on autologous bone graft resorption in staged maxillary sinus augmentation surgery using Cone-Beam CT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:409-415.
22. Wanschitz F, Figl M, Wagner A, Ewers R. Measurement of volume changes after sinus floor augmentation with phycogenic hydroxyapatite. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:433-438.
23. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/ xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15:339-345.
24. Zijderveld SA, Schulten EA, Aartman IH, ten Bruggenkante CM. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus floor elevation with different grafting materials: radiographic evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:691-700.
25. Arasawa M, Oda Y, Kobayashi T, etal. Evaluation of bone volume changes after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41:853-857.
26. Riachi F, Naaman N, Tabarani C, etal. Influence of material properties on rate of resorption of two bone graft materials after sinus lift using radiographic assessment. Int J Dent 2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/737262
27. Kirmeier R, Payer M, Wehrschuetz M, Jakse N, Platzer S, Lorenzoni M. Evaluation of three-dimensional changes after sinus floor augmentation with different grafting materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19:366-372.