The lived experience of individuals in cardiac rehabilitation who have a positive outlook on their cardiac recovery: A phenomenological inquiry

European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 230-239

  Nadarajah, Sheeba R ^a   Buchholz, Susan W ^b   Wiegand, Debra L ^c   Berger, Ann ^d  

^a BOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUSH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

barriers; cardiac recovery; Cardiac rehabilitation; facilitators; lifestyle changes; phenomenology; positive outlook; psychological distress

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FEMALE; HEART DISEASE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART REHABILITATION; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION; MALE; PHENOMENOLOGY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL STATUS; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COPING BEHAVIOR; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT; PSYCHOLOGY; VERY ELDERLY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CARDIAC REHABILITATION; FEMALE; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENTS;

EID: 85012054643     PISSN: 14745151     EISSN: 18731953     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1474515116651977     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bloom DE, Cafiero ET, Jané-Llopis E, et al. The Global Economic Burden of Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2011.
2. Certo CM,. History of cardiac rehabilitation. Phys Ther 1985; 65: 1793-1795.
3. Wenger NK,. Current status of cardiac rehabilitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 1619-1631.
4. Balady GJ, Ades PA, Bittner VA, et al. Referral, enrollment, and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs at clinical centers and beyond: A presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 124: 2951-2960.
5. Balady GJ, Williams MA, Ades PA, et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 Update: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation 2007; 115: 2675-2682.
6. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs. 4th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2004.
7. Squires RW, Gau GT, Miller TD, et al. Cardiovascular rehabilitation: Status, 1990. Mayo Clin Proc 1990; 65: 731-755.
8. Balady GJ,. Types of exercise. Arm-leg and static-dynamic. Cardiol Clin 1993; 11: 297-308.
9. Suaya JA, Shepard DS, Normand SL, et al. Use of cardiac rehabilitation by Medicare beneficiaries after myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery. Circulation 2007; 116: 1653-1662.
10. Clark AM, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, et al. Meta-analysis: Secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 659-672.
11. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med 2004; 116: 682-692.
12. Leon AS, Franklin BA, Costa F, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: An American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity), in collaboration with the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation 2005; 111: 369-376.
13. Goel K, Lennon RJ, Tilbury RT, et al. Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on mortality and cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in the community. Circulation 2011; 123: 2344-2352.
14. Jackson L, Leclerc J, Erskine Y, et al. Getting the most out of cardiac rehabilitation: A review of referral and adherence predictors. Heart 2005; 91: 10-14.
15. Jones M, Jolly K, Raftery J, et al. 'DNA' may not mean 'did not participate': A qualitative study of reasons for non-adherence at home- and centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Fam Pract 2007; 24: 343-357.
16. Cooper AF, Jackson G, Weinman J, et al. A qualitative study investigating patients' beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 87-96.
17. Wyer SJ, Earll L, Joseph S, et al. Deciding whether to attend a cardiac rehabilitation programme: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Coronary Health Care 2001; 5: 178-188.
18. Evenson KR, Fleury J,. Barriers to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation participation and adherence. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2000; 20: 241-246.
19. Dunlay SM, Witt BJ, Allison TG, et al. Barriers to participation in cardiac rehabilitation. Am Heart J 2009; 158: 852-859.
20. Grace SL, Gravely-Witte S, Brual J, et al. Contribution of patient and physician factors to cardiac rehabilitation referral: A prospective multilevel study. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008; 5: 653-662.
21. Turk-Adawi KI, Oldridge NB, Tarima SS, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation patient and organizational factors: What keeps patients in programs? J Am Heart Assoc 2013; 2: e000418.
22. Yohannes AM, Yalfani A, Doherty P, et al. Predictors of drop-out from an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programme. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21: 222-229.
23. Murray J, Craigs CL, Hill KM, et al. A systematic review of patient reported factors associated with uptake and completion of cardiovascular lifestyle behaviour change. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2012; 12: 120.
24. De Angelis C, Bunker S, Schoo A,. Exploring the barriers and enablers to attendance at rural cardiac rehabilitation programs. Aust J Rural Health 2008; 16: 137-142.
25. Gurewich D, Prottas J, Bhalotra S, et al. System-level factors and use of cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2008; 28: 380-385.
26. Brual J, Gravely-Witte S, Suskin N, et al. Drive time to cardiac rehabilitation: At what point does it affect utilization? Int J Health Geogr 2010; 9: 27-30.
27. Hamer M, Molloy GJ, Stamatakis E,. Psychological distress as a risk factor for cardiovascular events: Pathophysiological and behavioral mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 2156-2162.
28. Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Kaplan J,. Impact of psychological factors on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and implications for therapy. Circulation 1999; 99: 2192-2217.
29. Larsen KK,. Depression following myocardial infarction-an overseen complication with prognostic importance. Dan Med J 2013; 60: B4689.
30. Boehm JK, Kubzansky LD,. The heart's content: The association between positive psychological well-being and cardiovascular health. Psychol Bull 2012; 138: 655-691.
31. Davidson KW, Mostofsky E, Whang W,. Don't worry, be happy: Positive affect and reduced 10-year incident coronary heart disease: The Canadian Nova Scotia Health Survey. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 1065-1070.
32. Damen NL, Pelle AJ, Boersma E, et al. Reduced positive affect (anhedonia) is independently associated with 7-year mortality in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from the RESEARCH registry. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2013; 20: 127-134.
33. Hoogwegt MT, Versteeg H, Hansen TB, et al. Exercise mediates the association between positive affect and 5-year mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013; 6: 559-566.
34. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J,. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 349-357.
35. Husserl E,. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston, IL: North Western University Press, 1962.
36. Schutz A,. The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: North Western University Press, 1967.
37. Giorgi A, Barton A, Maes C,. Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1983.
38. Creswell JW,. Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.
39. Skeath P, Norris S, Katheria V, et al. The nature of life-transforming changes among cancer survivors. Qual Health Res 2013; 23: 1155-1167.
40. Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Trask PC, et al. Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer 2005; 103: 1494-1502.
41. Colaizzi P,. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In: Valle R, King M, eds. Existential phenemenologic alternative for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978, pp. 48-71.
42. Lincoln YS, Guba EG,. Naturalistic inquiry. New Bury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1985.
43. Cooper AF, Jackson G, Weinman J, et al. Factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation attendance: A systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 541-552.
44. De Vos C, Li X, Van Vlaenderen I, et al. Participating or not in a cardiac rehabilitation programme: Factors influencing a patient's decision. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2013; 20: 341-348.
45. Randall G, Molloy GJ, Steptoe A,. The impact of an acute cardiac event on the partners of patients: A systematic review. Health Psychol Rev 2009; 3: 1-84.
46. Leigh ES, Wikman A, Molloy GJ, et al. The psychosocial predictors of long-term distress in partners of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Psychol Health 2014; 29: 737-752.
47. Fast YJ, Steinke EE, Wright DW,. Effects of attending phase II cardiac rehabilitation on patient versus spouse (proxy) quality-of-life perceptions. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2009; 29: 115-120.
48. Kristofferzon ML, Lofmark R, Carlsson M,. Myocardial infarction: Gender differences in coping and social support. J Adv Nurs 2003; 44: 360-374.
49. Clark AM, Barbour RS, White M, et al. Promoting participation in cardiac rehabilitation: Patient choices and experiences. J Adv Nurs 2004; 47: 5-14.
50. Caldwell P, Arthur HM, Rideout E,. Lives of rural women after myocardial infarction. Can J Nurs Res 2005; 37: 54-67.
51. Clark AM, Barbour RS, McIntyre PD,. Preparing for change in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: A qualitative evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation within a region of Scotland. J Adv Nurs 2002; 39: 589-598.
52. Fernandez RS, Davidson P, Griffiths R,. Cardiac rehabilitation coordinators' perceptions of patient-related barriers to implementing cardiac evidence-based guidelines. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2008; 23: 449-457.
53. Vishram S, Crosland A, Unsworth J, et al. Engaging women from South Asian communities in cardiac rehabilitation. Br J Community Nurs 2007; 12: 13-18.
54. Dalal HM, Zawada A, Jolly K, et al. Home based versus centre based cardiac rehabilitation: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J 2010; 340: b5631.
55. Forman DE, LaFond K, Panch T, et al. Utility and efficacy of a smartphone application to enhance the learning and behavior goals of traditional cardiac rehabilitation: A feasibility study. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2014; 34: 327-334.
56. Alharbi M, Bauman A, Neubeck L, et al. Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 1476-1485.
57. Canyon S, Meshgin N,. Cardiac rehabilitation-reducing hospital readmissions through community based programs. Aust Fam Physician 2008; 37: 575-577.