Abandonment of croplands: problem or chance for grassland restoration? case studies from hungary

Ecosystem Health and Sustainability

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Valkó, Orsolya ^a   Deák, Balázs ^a   Török, Péter ^a   Kelemen, András ^a   Miglécz, Tamás ^a   Tóth, Katalin ^a   Tóthmérész, Béla ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

Author keywords

agri environmental schemes; agri environmental subsidy; agrobiodiversity; Central Europe; intensive agriculture; old field; seed sowing; Special Feature: Ecosystem Management in Transition in Central and Eastern Europe; spontaneous succession

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011830376     PISSN: 20964129     EISSN: 23328878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ehs2.1208     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Albert, Á.‐J., A., Kelemen, O., Valkó, T., Miglécz, A., Csecserits, T., Rédei, B., Deák, B., Tóthmérész, and P., Török. 2014. Trait‐based analysis of spontaneous grassland recovery in sandy old‐fields. Applied Vegetation Science 17:214–224.
2. Baer, S. G., D. J., Kitchen, J. M., Blair, and C. W., Rice. 2002. Changes in ecosystem function along a chronosequence of restored grasslands. Ecological Applications 12:1688–1701.
3. Bartha, S., et al., 2014. Impact of mid‐successional dominant species on the diversity and progress of succession in regenerating temperate grasslands. Applied Vegetation Science 17:201–213.
4. Bischoff, A., H., Auge, and E.‐G., Mahn. 2005. Seasonal changes in the relationship between plant species richness and community biomass in early succession. Basic and Applied Ecology 6:385–394.
5. Borhidi, A., 1995. Social behaviour types, the naturalness and relative indicator values of the higher plants in the Hungarian Flora. Acta Botanica Hungarica 39:97–181.
6. Ter braak, C. J. F., and P., Šmilauer. 2002. CANOCO Reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, USA.
7. Carson, W. P., and G. W., Barrett. 1988. Succession in old‐field plant communities: effects of contrasting types of nutrient enrichment. Ecology 69:984–994.
8. Csecserits, A., and T., Rédei. 2001. Secondary succession on sandy old‐fields in Hungary. Applied Vegetation Science 4:63–74.
9. Csecserits, A., R., Szabó, M., Halassy, and T., Rédei. 2007. Testing the validity of successional predictions on an old‐field chronosequence in Hungary. Community Ecology 8:195–207.
10. Csecserits, A., M., Halassy, G., Kröel‐dulay, T., Rédei, K., Szitár, and R., Szabó. 2011. Different regeneration success of sandy old‐fields in the forest‐steppe region of Hungary. Plant Biosystems 145:715–729.
11. Davies, A. S., J., Cardina, F., Forcella, G. A., Johnson, G., Kegode, J. L., Lindquist, E. C., Luschei, K. A., Renner, C. L., Sprague, and M. M., Williams. 2005. Environmental factors affecting seed persistence of annual weeds across the US corn belt. Weed Science 53:860–868.
12. Deák, B., O., Valkó, A., Kelemen, P., Török, T., Miglécz, T., Ölvedi, S., Lengyel, and B., Tóthmérész. 2011. Litter and graminoid biomass accumulation suppresses weedy forbs in grassland restoration. Plant Biosystems 145:730–737.
13. Deák, B., O., Valkó, and I., Kapocsi. 2013. Általános és alternatív természetvédelmi célú gyeptelepítési módszerek technológiai kivitelezése és költségei. Pages 77–82 in P., Török, editor. Gyeptelepítés elmélete és gyakorlata az ökológiai szemléletu gazdálkodásban. Ökológiai Mezogazdasági Kutatóintézet, Budapest, Hungary.
14. Deák, B., O., Valkó, P., Török, and B., Tóthmérész. 2014a. Solonetz meadow vegetation (Beckmannion eruciformis) in East‐Hungary—an alliance driven by moisture and salinity. Tuexenia 34:187–203.
15. Deák, B., O., Valkó, B., Tóthmérész, and P., Török. 2014b. Alkali marshes of Central‐Europe ecology, management and nature conservation. Pages 1–11 in H.‐B., Shao, editor. Salt marshes: ecosystem, vegetation and restoration strategies. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, New York, USA.
16. Deák, B., O., Valkó, C., Alexander, W., Mücke, A., Kania, J., Tamás, and H., Heilmeier. 2014c. Fine‐scale vertical position as an indicator of vegetation in alkali grasslands—case study based on remotely sensed data. Flora 209:693–697.
17. Deák, B., O., Valkó, P., Török, A., Kelemen, K., Tóth, T., Miglécz, and B., Tóthmérész. 2015. Reed cut, habitat diversity and productivity in wetlands. Ecological Complexity 22:121–125.
18. Deal, M. W., J., Xu, R., John, T., Zenone, J., Chen, H., Chu, P., Jasrotia, K., Kahmark, J., Bossenbroek, and C., Mayer. 2014. Net primary production in three bioenergy crop systems following land conversion. Journal of Plant Ecology. 7:451–460.
19. Dengler, J., M., Janišová, P., Török, and C., Wellstein. 2014. Biodiversity of Palaearctic grasslands: a synthesis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 182:1–14.
20. Eckstein, R. L., and T. W., Donath. 2005. Interactions between litter and water availability affect seedling emergence in four familiar pairs of floodplain species. Journal of Ecology 93:807–816.
21. Foster, B. L., C. A., Murphy, K. R., Keller, T. A., Aschenbach, E. J., Questad, and K., Kindscher. 2007. Restoration of prairie community structure and ecosystem function in an abandoned hayfield: a sowing experiment. Restoration Ecology 15:652–661.
22. Grant, T. A., B., Flanders‐wanner, T. L., Shaffer, R. K., Murphy, and G. A., Knutsen. 2009. An emerging crisis across northern prairie refuges: prevalence of invasive plants and a plan for adaptive management. Ecological Restoration 27:58–65.
23. Grime, J. P., 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. J Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
24. Házi, J., S., Bartha, S., Szentes, and K., Penksza. 2011. Seminatural grassland management by mowing of Calamagrostis epigeios in Hungary. Plant Biosystems 145:699–707.
25. Hedberg, P., and W., Kotowski. 2010. New nature by sowing? The current state of species introduction in grassland restoration, and the road ahead. Journal of Nature Conservation 18:304–308.
26. Hobbs, R. J., and V. A., Cramer. 2007. Why old fields? Socioeconomic and ecological causes and consequences of land abandonment. Pages 1–15 in V. A., Cramer, and R. J., Hobbs, editors. Old fields: dynamics and restoration of abandoned farmland. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
27. Hönigová, I., D., Vackár, El., Lorencová, J., Melichar, M., Götzl, G., Sonderegger, V., Oušková, M., Hošek, and K., Chobot. 2012. Survey on grassland ecosystem services. Report to the EEA—European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity. Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
28. Isselstein, J., B., Jeangros, and V., Pavlů. 2005. Agronomic aspects of biodiversity targeted management of temperate grasslands in Europe—a review. Agronomy Research 3:139–151.
29. Jírová, A., A., Klaudisová, and K., Prach. 2012. Spontaneous restoration of target vegetation in old‐fields in a central European landscape: a repeated analysis after three decades. Applied Vegetation Science 15:245–252.
30. Kelemen, A., P., Török, O., Valkó, T., Miglécz, and B., Tóthmérész. 2013. Mechanisms shaping plant biomass and species richness: plant strategies and litter effect in alkali and loess grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science 24:1195–1203.
31. Kelemen, A., P., Török, O., Valkó, B., Deák, T., Miglécz, K., Tóth, T., Ölvedi, and B., Tóthmérész. 2014. Sustaining recovered grasslands is not likely without proper management: vegetation changes and large‐scale evidences after cessation of mowing. Biodiversity and Conservation 23:741–751.
32. Kiehl, K., A., Kirmer, T. W., Donath, L., Rasran, and N., Hölzel. 2010. Species introduction in restoration projects—evaluation of different techniques for the establishment of semi‐natural grasslands in Central and Northwestern Europe. Basic and Applied Ecology 11:285–299.
33. Kirmer, A., et al., 2015. Large‐scale grassland restoration: high diversity seeding and knowledge transfer of regional seed propagation to Hungary. Debrecen University Press, Debrecen, Hungary.
34. Lamb, E. G., 2008. Direct and indirect control of grassland community structure by litter, resources, and biomass. Ecology 89:216–225.
35. Larson, D. L., and P. J., Anderson. 2001. Alien plant invasion in mixed‐grass prairie: effects of vegetation type and anthropogenic disturbance. Ecological Applications 11:128–141.
36. Lencová, K., and K., Prach. 2011. Restoration of hay meadows on ex‐arable land: commercial seed mixtures vs. spontaneous succession. Grass and Forage Science 66:265–271.
37. Lengyel, S., K., Varga, B., Kosztyi, L., Lontay, E., Déri, P., Török, and B., Tóthmérész. 2012. Grassland restoration to conserve landscape‐level biodiversity: a synthesis of early results from a large‐scale project. Applied Vegetation Science 15:264–276.
38. Lutman, P. J. W., G. W., Cussans, K. J., Wright, B. J., Wilson, N. G., Mc wright, and H. M., Lawson. 2001. The persistence of seeds of 16 weed species over six years in two arable fields. Weed Research 42:231–241.
39. Mace, G. M., K., Norris, and A. H., Fitter. 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27:19–26.
40. Matus, G., B., Tóthmérész, and M., Papp. 2003. Restoration prospects of abandoned species‐rich sandy grassland in Hungary. Applied Vegetation Science 6:169–178.
41. Mijnsbrugge, K. V., A., Bischoff, and B., Smith. 2010. A question of origin: where and how to collect seed for ecological restoration. Basic and Applied Ecology 11:300–311.
42. Prach, K., and P., Pyšek. 2001. Using spontaneous succession for restoration of human‐disturbed habitats: experience from Central Europe. Ecological Engineering 17:55–62.
43. Prach, K., and K., Řehounková. 2008. Spontaneous vegetation succession in gravel–sand pits: a potential for restoration. Restoration Ecology 16:305–312.
44. Prach, K., J., Lepš, and M., Rejmánek. 2007. Old field succession in Central Europe: local and regional patterns. Pages 180–201 in V. A., Cramer, and R. J., Hobbs, editors. Old fields: dynamics and restoration of abandoned farmland. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
45. Pullin, A. S., et al., 2009. Conservation focus on Europe: major conservation policy issues that need to be informed by conservation science. Conservation Biology 23:818–824.
46. Rayburn, A. P., and E. A., Laca. 2013. Strip‐seeding for grassland restoration: past successes and future potential. Ecological Restoration 31:147–153.
47. Renne, I. J., and B. F., Tracy. 2007. Disturbance persistence in managed grasslands: shifts in aboveground community structure and the weed seed bank. Plant Ecology 190:71–80.
48. Rounsewell, M. D. A., F., Ewert, I., Reginster, R., Leemans, and T. R., Carter. 2005. Future scenarios of European agricultural land use—II. Projecting changes in cropland and grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 107:117–135.
49. Ruprecht, E., 2005. Secondary succession in old‐fields in the Transylvanian Lowland (Romania). Preslia 77:145–157.
50. Ruprecht, E., 2006. Successfully recovered grassland: a promising example from Romanian old‐fields. Restoration Ecology 14:473–480.
51. Ryan, M. R., L. W., Burger, and E. W., Kurzejeski. 1998. The impact of CRP on avian wildlife: a review. Journal of Production Agriculture 11:61–66.
52. Smith, L. M., D. A., Haukos, S. T., Mcmurry, T., Lagrange, and D., Willis. 2011. Ecosystem services provided by playas in the High Plains: potential influences of USDA conservation programs. Ecological Applications. 21:S82–S92.
53. Tallis, H., P., Kareiva, M., Marvier, and A., Chang. 2008. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105:9457–9464.
54. Thompson, K., J. P., Bakker, and R. M., Bekker. 1997. Soil seed banks of North West Europe: methodology, density and longevity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
55. Török, P., B., Deák, E., Vida, O., Valkó, S., Lengyel, and B., Tóthmérész. 2010. Restoring grassland biodiversity: sowing low diversity seed mixtures can lead to rapid favourable changes. Biological Conservation 148:806–812.
56. Török, P., E., Vida, B., Deák, S., Lengyel, and B., Tóthmérész. 2011a. Grassland restoration on former croplands in Europe: an assessment of applicability of techniques and costs. Biodiversity and Conservation 20:2311–2332.
57. Török, P., A., Kelemen, O., Valkó, B., Deák, B., Lukács, and B., Tóthmérész. 2011b. Lucerne‐dominated fields recover native grass diversity without intensive management actions. Journal of Applied Ecology 48:257–264.
58. Török, P., I., Kapocsi, and B., Deák. 2012a. Conservation and management of alkali grassland biodiversity in Central‐Europe. Pages 109–118 in W. J., Zhang, editor. Grasslands: types, biodiversity and impacts. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, New York, USA.
59. Török, P., T., Miglécz, O., Valkó, A., Kelemen, B., Deák, S., Lengyel, and B., Tóthmérész. 2012b. Recovery of native grass biodiversity by sowing on former croplands: is weed suppression a feasible goal for grassland restoration? Journal for Nature Conservation 20:41–48.
60. Török, P., B., Deák, O., Valkó, A., Kelemen, I., Kapocsi, T., Miglécz, and B., Tóthmérész. 2013. Recovery of alkali grasslands using native seed mixtures in Hungary. Pages 18–198 in K., Kiehl, A., Kirmer, N., Shaw, and S., Tischew, editors. Guidelines for native seed production and grassland restoration. Cambridge University Press, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
61. Tóth, K., and B., Hüse. 2014. Soil seed banks in loess grasslands and their role in grassland recovery. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 12:37–547.
62. Valkó, O., B., Tóthmérész, A., Kelemen, E., Simon, T., Miglécz, B., Lukács, and P., Török. 2014. Environmental factors driving vegetation and seed bank diversity in alkali grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 182:80–87.
63. Zar, J. H., 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice & Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
64. Zuur, A. F., E. N., Ieno, N., Walker, A. A., Saveliev, and G. M., Smith. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York, New York, USA.