Mechanisms shaping plant biomass and species richness: Plant strategies and litter effect in alkali and loess grasslands

Journal of Vegetation Science

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1195-1203

  Kelemen, András ^a   Török, Péter ^a   Valkó, Orsolya ^a   Miglécz, Tamás ^a   Tóthmérész, Béla ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Alkali landscape; C S R strategies; Competition; Humped back; Plant trait; Productivity; Steppe; Stress

Indexed keywords

ALKALINITY; BIOMASS; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DATA SET; GRASSLAND; LANDSCAPE; PRIMARY PRODUCTION; SPECIES RICHNESS; STEPPE; VEGETATION STRUCTURE;

CENTRAL EUROPE;

EID: 84885172392     PISSN: 11009233     EISSN: 16541103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12027     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adler, P.B., Seabloom, E.W., Borer, E.T., Hillebrand, H., Hautier, Y., Hector, A., Harpole, W.S., O'Halloran, L.R., Grace, J.B., Anderson, T.M., Bakker, J.D., Biederman, L.A., Brown, C.S., Buckley, Y.M., Calabrese, L.B., Chu, C.-J., Cleland, E.E., Collins, S.L., Cottingham, K.L., Crawley, M.J., Damschen, E.I., Davies, K.F., DeCrappeo, N.M., Fay, P.A., Firn, J., Frater, P., Gasarch, E.I., Gruner, D.S., Hagenah, N., Lambers, J.H.R., Humphries, H., Jin, V.L., Kay, A.D., Kirkman, K.P., Klein, J.A., Knops, J.M.H., La Pierre, K.J., Lambrinos, J.G., Li, W., MacDougall, A.S., McCulley, R.L., Melbourne, B.A., Mitchell, C.E., Moore, J.L., Morgan, J.W., Mortensen, B., Orrock, J.L., Prober, S.M., Pyke, D.A., Risch, A.C., Schuetz, M., Smith, M.D., Stevens, C.J., Sullivan, L.L., Wang, G., Wragg, P.D., Wright, J.P. & Yang, L.H. 2011. Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness. Science 333: 1750-1753.
2. Al-Mufti, M.M., Sydes, C.L., Furness, S.B., Grime, J.P. & Band, S.R. 1977. A quantitative analysis of shoot phenology and dominance in herbaceous vegetation. Journal of Ecology 65: 759-791.
3. Amatangelo, K.L., Dukes, J.S. & Field, C.B. 2008. Responses of a California annual grassland to litter manipulation. Journal of Vegetation Science 19: 605-612.
4. Bakker, J.P. 1985. The impact of grazing on plant communities, plant populations and soil conditions in salt marshes. Vegetatio 62: 391-398.
5. Bakker, J.P. & Berendse, F. 1999. Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 63-68.
6. Bhattarai, K.R., Vetaas, O.R. & Grytnes, J.A. 2004. Relationship between plant species richness and biomass in an arid sub-alpine grassland of the Central Himalayas, Nepal. Folia Geobotanica 39: 57-71.
7. Billeter, R., Peintinger, M. & Diemer, M. 2007. Restoration of montane fen meadows by mowing remains possible after 4-35 years of abandonment. Botanica Helvetica 117: 1-13.
8. Bischoff, A., Augeb, H. & Mahn, E-G. 2005. Seasonal changes in the relationship between plant species richness and community biomass in early succession. Basic and Applied Ecology 6: 385-394.
9. Biswas, S.R. & Mallik, A.U. 2010. Disturbance effects on species diversity and functional diversity in riparian and upland plant communities. Ecology 91: 28-35.
10. Biswas, S.R. & Mallik, A.U. 2011. Species diversity and functional diversity relationship varies with disturbance intensity. Ecosphere 2: art52.
11. Boeken, B. & Orenstein, D. 2001. The effect of plant litter on ecosystem properties in a Mediterranean semi-arid shrubland. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 825-832.
12. Carson, W.P. & Peterson, C.J. 1990. The role of litter in an old-field community: impact of litter quantity in different seasons on plant species richness and abundance. Oecologia 85: 8-13.
13. Chiarucci, A., Alongi, C. & Wilson, J.B. 2004. Competitive exclusion and the no-interaction model operate simultaneously in microcosm plant communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 15: 789-796.
14. Cornwell, W.K. & Grubb, P.J. 2003. Regional and local patterns in plant species richness with respect to resource availability. Oikos 100: 417-428.
15. Day, R.T., Keddy, P.A., McNeill, J. & Carleton, T. 1988. Fertility and disturbance gradients: a summary model for riverine marsh vegetation. Ecology 69: 1044-1054.
16. Deák, B., Valkó, O., Kelemen, A., Török, P., Miglécz, T., Ölvedi, T., Lengyel, S.Z. & Tóthmérész, B. 2011. Litter and graminoid biomass accumulation suppresses weedy forbs in grassland restoration. Plant Biosystems 145: 730-737.
17. Dolt, C., Goverde, M. & Baur, B. 2005. Effects of experimental small-scale habitat fragmentation on above- and below-ground plant biomass in calcareous grasslands. Acta Oecologica 27: 49-56.
18. Dostál, P., Havlíčková, V., Jorritsma-Wienk, L.D., Eriksson, O. & Herben, T. 2009. Interspecific competition changes reproductive output but does not increase reproductive costs in a grassland perennial. Basic and Applied Ecology 10: 525-534.
19. Eckstein, R.L. & Donath, T.W. 2005. Interactions between litter and water availability affect seedling emergence in four familial pairs of floodplain species. Journal of Ecology 93: 807-816.
20. Egan, T.P. & Ungar, I.A. 2000. Similarity between seed banks and above-ground vegetation along a salinity gradient. Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 189-194.
21. Emanuel, R.E., Riveros-Iregui, D.A., McGlynn, B.L. & Epstein, H.E. 2011. On the spatial heterogeneity of net ecosystem productivity in complex landscapes. Ecosphere 2: art86.
22. Facelli, J.M. & Carson, W.P. 1991. Heterogeneity of plant litter accumulation in successional communities. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 118: 62-66.
23. Facelli, J.M. & Pickett, S.T.A. 1991. Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Botanical Review 57: 1-32.
24. Facelli, J.M., Montero, C.M. & Leon, R.J.C. 1988. Effect of different disturbance regimen on seminatural grasslands from the subhumid pampa. Flora 180: 241-249.
25. Fischer, M. & Stöcklin, J. 1997. Local extinction of plants in remnants of extensively used calcareous grasslands 1950-1985. Conservation Biology 11: 727-737.
26. Forbes, S.P., Schauwecker, T. & Weiher, E. 2001. Rarefaction does not eliminate the species richness-biomass relationship in calcareous blackland prairies. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 525-532.
27. Foster, B.L. 1999. Establishment, competition and the distribution of native grasses among Michigan old-fields. Journal of Ecology 87: 476-789.
28. Fraser, L.H. & Keddy, P.A. 2005. Can competitive ability predict structure in experimental plant communities? Journal of Vegetation Science 16: 571-578.
29. Fridley, J.D., Grime, P.J., Huston, M.A., Pierce, S., Smart, S.M., Thompson, K., Börger, L., Brooker, R.W., Cerabolini, B.E.L., Gross, N., Liancourt, P., Michalet, R. & Le Bagousse-Pinguet, Y. 2012. Comment on "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness". Science 335: 1441.
30. García-Guzmán, G. & Benítez-Malvido, J. 2003. Effect of litter on the incidence of leaf-fungal pathogens and herbivory in seedlings of the tropical tree Nectandra ambigens. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19: 171-177.
31. Gillman, L.N. & Wright, S.D. 2006. The influence of productivity on the species richness of plants: a critical assessment. Ecology 87: 234-1243.
32. Gough, L., Grace, J.B. & Taylor, K.L. 1994. The relationship between species richness and community biomass: the importance of environmental variables. Oikos 70: 271-279.
33. Grace, J.B. & Pugesek, B.H. 1997. A structural equation model of plant species richness and its application to a coastal wetland. American Naturalist 149: 436-460.
34. Grime, J.P. 1973. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242: 344-347.
35. Grime, J.P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley and Son, New York, NY, US.
36. Grime, J.P. 1997. The humped-back model: a response to Oksanen. Journal of Ecology 85: 97-98.
37. Guo, Q. 2003. Temporal species richness-biomass relationships along successional gradients. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 121-128.
38. Guo, Q. 2007. The diversity-biomass-productivity relationships in grassland management and restoration. Basic and Applied Ecology 8: 199-208.
39. Guo, Q. & Berry, W. L. 1998. Species richness and biomass: dissection of the hump-shaped relationships. Ecology 79: 2555-2559.
40. Hawkins, B.A., Field, R., Cornell, H.V., Currie, D.J., Guégan, J-F., Kaufman, D.M., Kerr, J.T., Mittelbach, G.G., Oberdorff, T., O'Brien, E.M., Porter, E.E. & Turner, J.R.G. 2003. Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84: 3105-3117.
41. Hodgson, J.G., Wilson, P., Hunt, R., Grime, J. & Thompson, K. 1999. Allocating C-S-R plant functional types: a soft approach to a hard problem. Oikos 85: 282-296.
42. Lamb, E.G. 2008. Direct and indirect control of grassland community structure by litter, resources, and biomass. Ecology 89: 216-225.
43. Lepš, J. 1999. Nutrient status, disturbance and competition: an experimental test of relationships in a wet meadow. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 219-230.
44. Liancourt, P., Corcket, E. & Michalet, R. 2005. Stress tolerance abilities and competitive responses in a watering and fertilization field experiment. Journal of Vegetation Science 16: 713-722.
45. Michalet, R., Gandoy, C., Joud, D., Pagès, J-P. & Choler, P. 2002. Plant community composition and biomass on calcareous and siliceous substrates in the Northern French Alps: comparative effects of soil chemistry and water status. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research 34: 102-113.
46. Michalet, R., Brooker, R.W., Cavieres, L.A., Kikvidze, Z., Lortie, C.J., Pugnaire, F.I., Valiente-Banuet, A. & Callaway, R.M. 2006. Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities? Ecology Letters 9: 767-773.
47. Mittelbach, G.G., Steiner, C.F., Scheiner, S.M., Gross, K.L., Reynolds, H.L., Waide, R.B., Willig, M.R., Dodson, S.I. & Gough, L. 2001. What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 82: 2381-2396.
48. Oba, G., Vetaas, O.R. & Stenseth, N.C. 2001. Relationships between biomass and plant species richness in arid-zone grazing lands. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 836-845.
49. Oksanen, J. 1996. Is the humped relationship between species richness and biomass an artefact due to plot size? Journal of Ecology 84: 293-295.
50. Rietkerk, M., Ketner, P., Burger, J., Hoorens, B. & Olff, H. 2000. Multiscale soil and vegetation patchiness along a gradient of herbivore impact in a semi-arid grazing system in West Africa. Plant Ecology 148: 207-224.
51. Ruprecht, E. & Szabó, A. 2011. Grass litter is a natural seed trap in long-term undisturbed grassland. Journal of Vegetation Science, 23: 493-504.
52. Ruprecht, E., Józsa, J., Ölvedi, T.B. & Simon, J. 2010. Differential effects of several ''litter'' types on the germination of dry grassland species. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 1069-1081.
53. Safford, H.D., Rejmanek, M. & Hadac, E. 2001. Species pools and the "humpback" model of plant species diversity: an empirical analysis at a relevant spatial scale. Oikos 95: 282-290.
54. Simon, T. 2000. A magyarországi edényes flóra határozója [The vascular flora of Hungary; in Hungarian]. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest, HU.
55. Thompson, K., Bakker, J.P. & Bekker, R.M. 1997. Soil seed banks of North West Europe: methodology, density and longevity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
56. Tilman, D. 1993. Species richness of experimental productivity gradients: how important is colonization limitation? Ecology 74: 2179-2191.
57. Tilman, D. & Pacala, S. 1993. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities. In Ricklefs, R. & Schluter, D. (eds.) Species diversity, pp. 13-25. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, US.
58. Török, P., Kelemen, A., Valkó, O., Deák, B., Lukács, B. & Tóthmérész, B. 2011. Lucerne-dominated fields recover native grass diversity without intensive management actions. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 257-264.
59. Wang, G., Li, H., An, M., Ni, J., Ji, S. & Wang, J. 2011. A regional-scale consideration of the effects of species richness on above-ground biomass in temperate natural grasslands of China. Journal of Vegetation Science 22: 414-424.
60. Whittaker, R.J. 2010. Meta-analyses and mega-mistakes: calling time on meta-analysis of the species richness-productivity relationship. Ecology 91: 2522-2533.
61. Willms, W.D., Smoliak, S. & Bailey, A.W. 1986. Herbage production following litter removal on Alberta native grasslands. Journal of Range Management 39: 536-539.
62. Wisheu, I.C. & Keddy, P.A. 1989. The conservation and management of a threatened coastal plain plant community in Eastern North America (Nova Scotia, Canada). Biological Conservation 48: 229-238.
63. Xiong, S. & Nilsson, C. 1999. The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta-analysis. Journal of Ecology 87: 984-994.
64. Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, NJ, US.