Application of psychoacoustics for gear fault diagnosis using artificial neural network

Journal of Low Frequency Noise Vibration and Active Control

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 207-220

  Kane, P V ^a   Andhare, A B ^a  

^a VISVESVARAYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Assembly line inspection; Gear fault diagnosis; Psychoacoustics

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ASSEMBLY; ASSEMBLY MACHINES; AUDITION; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FAULT DETECTION; GEAR MANUFACTURE; INSPECTION; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES; ASSEMBLY LINE INSPECTION; FAULTY CONDITION; GEAR FAULT DIAGNOSIS; MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENTS; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; STATISTICAL FEATURES; STATISTICAL INDICES;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 85011634438     PISSN: 14613484     EISSN: 20484046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0263092316660915     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Caryer Cook VG and Ali A. End-of-line inspection for annoying noises in automobiles: Trends and perspectives. Appl Acoust 2012; 73: 265-275.
2. Parizet E, Guyader E and Nosulenko V. Analysis of car door closing sound quality. Appl Acoust 2008; 69: 12-22.
3. Nykänenandand A and Sirkka A. Specification of component sound quality applied to automobile power windows. Appl Acoust 2009; 70: 813-820.
4. Lim TC. Correlations between deficiencies in power window systems influencing sound quality and some psychoacoustic metrics. Appl Acoust 2001; 62: 1025-1047.
5. Cerrato-Jay BG, Dong J, Pickering DJ, et al. The development of a sound quality-based end-of-line inspection system for powered seat adjusters. SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0040, 2001.
6. Yıldırımand S and Eski I. Sound quality analysis of cars using hybrid neural networks. Simulat Model Pract Theory 2008; 16: 410-418.
7. Zhou J and Wenlei S. Vibration and noise radiation characteristics of gear transmission system. J Low Freq Noise Vibr Active Control 2014; 33: 485-502.
8. Shen Y, Yang S, Pan C, et al. Non-linear dynamics of spur gear pair with a time varying stiffness and backlash. J Low Freq Noise Vibr Active Control 2004; 33: 179-187.
9. Driot N and Perret-Liaudet J. Variability of modal behavior in terms of critical speeds of a gear pair due to manufacturing errors and shaft misalignments. J Sound Vibr 2006; 292: 824-843.
10. Bonori G and Pellicano F. Non-smooth dynamics of spur gears with manufacturing errors. J Sound Vibr 2007; 306: 271-283.
11. Wang YS, Ma QH, Zhu Q, et al. An intelligent approach for engine fault diagnosis based on Hilbert-Huang transform and support vector machine. Appl Acoust 2014; 75: 1-9.
12. Han L, Li CW, Guo SL, et al. Feature extraction method of bearing AE signal based on improved FAST-ICA and wavelet packet energy. Mech Syst Signal Process 2015; 62-63: 91-99.
13. Kankar PK, Sharma SC and Harsha SP. Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis using wavelet transform. Neurocomputing 2011; 74: 1638-1645.
14. Nie M and Wang L. Review of condition monitoring and fault diagnosis technologies for wind turbine gearbox. Proc CIRP 2013; 11: 287-290.
15. Singh GK and Al Kazzaz SAS. Induction machine drive condition monitoring and diagnostic research—A survey. Electric Power Syst Res 2003; 64: 145-158.
16. Peng ZK and Chu FL. Application of the wavelet transform in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnostics: A review with bibliography. Mech Syst Signal Process 2004; 18: 199-221.
17. Jardine AKS, Lin D and Banjevic D. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 2006; 20: 1483-1510.
18. Abd-El-Tawwab A, El-Sayed A-S and El-Hakim A. Characteristics of agriculture tractor interior noise. J Low Freq Noise Vibr Active Control 2000; 19: 73-81.
19. Georgiev VB, Krylov VV and Winward RETB. Simplified modeling of vehicle interior noise: Comparison of analytical, numerical and experimental approaches. J Low Freq Noise Vibr Active Control 2006; 25: 69-92.
20. Wang YS, Lee C-M, Kim D-G, et al. Sound-quality prediction for non-stationary vehicle interior noise based on wavelet pre-processing neural network model. J Sound Vibr 2007; 299: 933-947.
21. Saravanan N, Kumar Siddabattuni VNS and Ramachandran KI. Fault diagnosis of spur bevel gear box using artificial neural network (ANN), and proximal support vector machine (PSVM). Appl Soft Comput 2010; 10: 344-360.
22. El Badaoui M, Guillet F and Daniere J. New applications of the real cepstrum to gear signals, including definition of a robust fault indicator. Mech Syst Signal Process 2004; 18: 1031-1046.
23. Wang WQ, Ismail F and Golnaraghi MF. Assessment of gear damage monitoring techniques using vibration measurements. Mech Syst Signal Process 2001; 15: 905-922.
24. Loutas T, Sotiriades G and Kostopoulos V. Condition monitoring of gears and advanced signal processing techniques towards more effective diagnostic schemes. Noise Vibr Worldwide 2010; 41: 10-18.
25. Shang W, Zhou X and Yuan J. An intelligent fault diagnosis system for newly assembled transmission. Expert Syst Appl 2014; 41: 4060-4072.
26. Vecˇerˇ P, Kreidl M and Sˇ mı´d R. Condition indicators for gearbox condition monitoring systems. Acta Polytechn-J Adv Eng 2005; 45: 35-43.
27. Sharma V and Parey A. Review of gear fault diagnosis using various condition monitoring indicators. In: Proceedings of ICOVP 2015, 12th international conference on vibration problems, IIT, Guwahati, India, 14-17 December 2015.
28. Zhu J, Nostrand T, Spigel C, et al. Survey of condition indicators for condition monitoring systems. In: Proceedings of annual conference of the prognostic and health management society, Texas, USA, 29 September-02 October 2014, pp.1-13.
29. Klein R. Condition indicators for gear. In: Annual conference of prognostic and health management society, Minneapolis, USA, 23-27 September 2012, pp.1-8.
30. Zwicker E, Fastl H. Psychoacoustics: Facts and models. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2007.
31. NI-Tutorial-1526. White paper on Measurement of Sound Quality, https://www.ni.com/tutorials and http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/372416B-01/sndvibtk/aures_tonality/ (13 June 2013).
32. Technical note. An introduction to sound quality testing. Manchester, UK: Acoustic Research Centre, School of Computing, Science and Engineering, University of Salford, http://www.salford.ac.uk (10 October 2015).
33. Kim E-Y, Lee YG-J and Lee SG-K. Sound metric design for evaluation of tonal sound in laser printer. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 2012; 13: 1349-1358.
34. Fastl H. Psychoacoustic basis of sound quality evaluation and sound engineering. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth international congress on sound and vibration, Vienna, Austria, 1-16, 2-6 July 2006.
35. Fastl H. The psychoacoustics of sound quality evaluation. Acta Acust 1997; 83: 754-764.
36. Wang Y, Shu G and Wei H. Statistical evaluation and regression analysis of vehicle sound quality. Trans Tianjin Univ 2006; 12: 297-302.
37. Bodden M. Instrumentation for sound quality evaluation. Acta Acust 1997; 83: 775-783.
38. Bishop CM. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
39. Duda RO, Hart PE and Storkv DG. Pattern classification, 2nd ed. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
40. Demuth H and Beale M. Neural network toolbox for use with MATLAB, Release 13. USA: Mathworks, 2002.