Reliability, validity, and feasibility of a computer-based geriatric assessment for older adults with cancer

Journal of Oncology Practice

Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2016, Pages e1025-e1034

  Hurria, Arti ^a,c   Akiba, Chie ^c   Kim, Jerome ^c   Mitani, Dale ^c   Loscalzo, Matthew ^c   Katheria, Vani ^c   Koczywas, Marianna ^c   Pal, Sumanta ^c   Chung, Vincent ^c   Forman, Stephen ^c   Nathwani, Nitya ^c   Fakih, Marwan ^c   Karanes, Chatchada ^c   Lim, Dean ^c   Popplewell, Leslie ^c   Cohen, Harvey ^c   Canin, Beverly ^c   Cella, David ^c   Ferrell, Betty ^c   Goldstein, Leanne ^a  

^a

^b United States

^c CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER BASED GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENGLISH (LANGUAGE); FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOLID TUMOR; VALIDITY; NEOPLASM; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85011605310     PISSN: 15547477     EISSN: 1935469X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2016.013136     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Extermann M, Overcash J, Lyman GH, et al: Comorbidity and functional status are independent in older cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 16:1582-1587, 1998
2. Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M, et al: International Society of Geriatric Oncology consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 32: 2595-2603, 2014
3. Hurria A, Cirrincione CT, Muss HB, et al: Implementing a geriatric assessment in cooperative group clinical cancer trials: CALGB 360401. J Clin Oncol 29:1290-1296, 2011
4. Hurria A, Gupta S, Zauderer M, et al: Developing a cancer-specific geriatric assessment: A feasibility study. Cancer 104:1998-2005, 2005
5. Clark K, Bardwell WA, Arsenault T, et al: Implementing touch-screen technology to enhance recognition of distress. Psychooncology 18:822-830, 2009
6. Loscalzo M, Clark KL, Holland J: Successful strategies for implementing biopsychosocial screening. Psychooncology 20:455-462, 2011
7. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)- A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377-381, 2009
8. Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG, et al: Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: A prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 29:3457-3465, 2011
9. McCleary NJ, Wigler D, Berry D, et al: Feasibility of computer-based selfadministered cancer-specific geriatric assessment in older patients with gastrointestinal malignancy. Oncologist 18:64-72, 2013
10. Collerton J, Collerton D, Arai Y, et al: A comparison of computerized and penciland-paper tasks in assessing cognitive function in community-dwelling older people in the Newcastle 85+ Pilot Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:1630-1635, 2007
11. Echt KV, Morrell RW, Park DC. Effects of age and training formats on basic computer skill acquisition in older adults. Educ Gerontol 24:3-25, 1998
12. Newell S, Girgis A, Sanson-Fisher RW, et al: Are touchscreen computer surveys acceptable to medical oncology patients? J Psychosoc Oncol 15:37-46, 1997
13. Fillenbaum GG, Smyer MA: The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. J Gerontol 36:428-434, 1981